Search Results

1. QK v GB Ltd [2022] NZDT 26 (8 March 2022) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...is reasonable to assume that the freezer will now continue to function normally for a decent length of time. 8. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: LK Whineray Date: 8 March 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. Form 33 Family Invoice Family Violence [pdf, 239 KB]

   Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 33 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Family Violence (Applicant & Respondent) Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final...

3. NQ v OS [2022] NZDT 109 (10 August 2022) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...the Act of God causing the damage to NQ’ vehicle. 9. For these reasons I have not discussed the issues of liability and the claim is dismissed. Referee: P Goddard Date: 10 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. DF v FX [2023] NZDT 673 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...any contributory negligence by DF, FX is solely liable for the damage caused to DF’ vehicle and is liable to J Ltd for the repair costs. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 31 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. OE v PN [2024] NZDT 179 (22 March 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...has not been met and therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Nigel Wolland Date: 22 March 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. WQ v QZ [2023] NZDT 420 (14 September 2023) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...the exclusive jurisdiction of the Tenancy Tribunal and there is no ability under the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 to transfer the claim, it is struck out. Referee: GM Taylor Date: 14 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. N Ltd v TT [2023] NZDT 224 (16 May 2023) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...matter of this claim now before the Tribunal are the same as for the matter previously heard. 8. For these reasons, this claim is struck out. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 16 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

8. SD v MT [2024] NZDT 57 (19 February 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...$1,484.75 in compensation for the damage caused by the collision. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 19 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 32 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...[6] Mr Lorigan applied to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal the making of these orders, but that application was declined on 31 July 2020.6 [7] The background to these orders is relevant to the present application. Mr Lorigan had been requested on several occasions to pay the sums referred to at para [5](a) and (b). It was plain from correspondence he had no intention of doing so. Rather, he raised matters that were irrelevant from a legal perspective. He had made variou...

10. HL v UED Ltd [2022] NZDT 113 (7 August 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...BE Ltd and HL. 8. At the top right of the document is written, FC BDS (Otago), UED Ltd. This is followed by the address and contact details. At the top left is UED Ltd’s logo, which is owned by UED Ltd. Below that is the heading Orthodontic Information Sheet, then HL’s details. The treatment plan is set out, and there is a section entitled “orthodontic information and informed consent document”. 9. I note that the reference to “UED Ltd” under FC’s name is to the trad...