Search Results

1. BT v T Limited [2024] NZDT 656 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...he ordered the correct quantity of materials and to check that what the builder wanted BT to order was correct. 6. Mr N, representing T Limited, said T Limited was provided with a handwritten list of roofing material requirements that it was informed was from BT’s builder. He said T Limited also sighted the plans, but it was not possible to know the quality of the product required from the plans. It can either manufacture materials based on what a client or builder orders, or alter...

2. KB v TG [2024] NZDT 800 (28 November 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 17. Therefore, TG is to pay K Ltd $9,075.51 by Friday 10 January 2025. 18. TG’s counterclaim is dismissed. Referee: C Price Date: 28 November 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

3. BU & SI v UQ & CQ [2024] NZDT 811 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...continued to work. 18. As such, I do not find that the claim is proven and dismiss it. Referee: S Malaviya Date: 20 December 2024 1 Overton Holdings Ltd v APN New Zealand Ltd [2015] NZCA 526 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. I Ltd v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 567 (12 August 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...conclusion, I find that clause 25.3 of the contract prohibits Q Ltd from making a claim for consequential losses, therefore the counterclaim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 12 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. NM v OB [2025] NZDT 56 (22 February 2025) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 56 APPLICANT NM RESPONDENT OB The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NM purchased a [vehicle] from OB. The day after purchase NM was informed by others the [vehicle] was blowing blue smoke. NM later had a post purchase inspection of the [vehicle] and the inspection suggests a likely cause of the blue smoke is current or imminent engine failure and raised other issues. NM alleg...

6. ZP v EX [2024] NZDT 858 (10 December 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...$18,000.00 being the purchase price of D, the veterinarian costs incurred and the half share to euthanise D. Accordingly, I order EX to pay ZP $19,701.77. Referee: Nigel Wolland Date: 10 December 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. BT v C Ltd [2025] NZDT 154 (3 June 2025) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...booking could have been taken many years before so that the photos do not represent the property as it is now. However, as the listing photos have not been provided, I am unable to reach that conclusion. BT has therefore provided insufficient information on which I could conclude that the property had been misrepresented. Was the holiday home fit for its intended purpose and of acceptable quality? 10. BT said the home was unclean and overpriced. The photos show that the outside

8. EI v CL & KB [2025] NZDT 238 (4 June 2025) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...pre-accident value, less the money EI received for the wreck, and less the money that has already been paid to him. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 C Bridgeman Disputes Tribunal Referee 4 June 2025 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 172 Gregory v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...a view to setting up a committee once full staffing was in place. In or around October 2006, Mr Gregory was given a three month secondment to the position of Business Coach under Ngaro Nellie Sagar, then the Human Resources Advisor. Ms Sagar claimed that Mr Gregory was reluctant to relinquish his PCO position and, contrary to her instructions, continued to have contact with staff, prisoners and, at times, the management in the visits area. She considered this was inappropriate a...

10. Gray & Ors as Trustees of the John Gray Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 300 KB]

    ...where appropriate. 1.6 It has been necessary to hold three preliminary conferences and issue nineteen Procedural Orders prior to the conclusion of the hearings. These Orders were needed to set down timetables, and to rule on applications and requests made by the parties in the lead-up to the hearings. Although these Procedural Orders are not a part of this Determination, they are mentioned because some of the Claim 027 – Ponsonby Gardens – Unit 2 page 4 of 121...