Search Results

1. Dooley v Canterbury District Health Board (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 34 [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...Commissioner [2] In 2015 Mr Dooley alleged the South Canterbury District Health Board (SCDHB) had not supplied him with all the information to which he was entitled and had not responded to his request for correction of his information. Mr Dooley had also requested the SCDHB to delete his information from its electronic system and to surrender to him all hard copy records of his medical information. On a complaint being made by Mr Dooley the Privacy Commissioner in 2015 investigated a...

2. TU v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 670 (8 December 2023) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...company. 5. In March 2020, TU contacted NG for a service of the system, which was carried out. Issues again arose with the system in 2021, as a circuit breaker for the system had tripped and the system had overflowed. NG installed a new pump and informed TU that water may still be CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 getting into the system and the entire system may need replacement. Given that this occurred after major drainage works occurred to ensure surface water was not gettin...

3. GX v J Ltd [2024] NZDT 641 (3 September 2024) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...have a policy for Roadside Assist for this vehicle, and as he did not incur the cost of the tow in reliance upon any advice or representations of J Ltd. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 3 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. MM v UN Ltd [2024] NZDT 668 (22nd July 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...regarding the damage. However, the carrier did not produce its phone recordings of the conversations after the move, so I draw an adverse inference that the evidence of these recordings would be likely to have supported the owner’s claim that she informed the carrier of the damage by phone. 10. The terms and conditions required written notice of insured damage within 24 hours, but the context suggests that this limitation only applies to damage caused by the vehicle being involved in...

5. OT v KI [2024] NZDT 385 (3 May 2024) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...exceptions that do not apply here, costs shall not be awarded against a party to any proceedings before a Tribunal. The sum payable is therefore $2,974.48. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 3 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. KE v JM [2024] NZDT 332 (29 April 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...words ‘pure-bred’ means in relation to the genetic make-up of a dog. I have considered the evidence presented from an internet source that a ‘purebred’ is anything over 87.5% however I am unable to place weight on this as the source of this information is unverified. b. I had adjourned the first hearing to allow the parties to an opportunity to provide information from a verified source as to what ‘purebred’ means, however neither did so. In the absence of any other i...

7. Deliu v New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...The allegations made against Randerson J [10] In the separate “Bundle of Documents – Randerson J complaint by F Deliu” there is a letter dated 27 May 2010 from Mr Deliu to the Judicial Conduct Commissioner. It opens: I write to lodge a formal complaint against Justice Randerson. The essential grounds of my complaint are that his Honour has: 1. Defamed me to the President of the New Zealand Law Society; 2. Refused to apologize to a fellow court officer as a duty of respect wo...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 200 Jonas v Menefy Trucking Ltd [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...little damage but the galvanised post had to be replaced. That was the incident resulting in Mr Jonas’ dismissal. [10] Prior to the incident Mr Jonas appears to have had concerns about congestion in Pacific’s yard. The Court was not informed about the type of truck he drove while working for Monex but in evidence, which was unchallenged, Mr Jonas said that when he was making the deliveries for Menefy, he became concerned because, “the site was very tight for me to g...

9. KA v CU Ltd & ZX & GY [2019] NZDT 1501 (18 July 2019) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...control of the land until 2017, so CU Ltd is not liable for the damage to KA’s drains. The tree owners are liable for her total drain repair costs of $2,547.26. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 18 July 2019 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available. If you wish to apply for a rehearin...

10. EU v LX [2019] NZDT 1487 (23 October 2019) [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...District Court [2019] NZDT 1487 APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT LX The Tribunal hereby orders: LX is to pay the sum of $3,703.31 to EU on or before Wednesday 6 November 2019. Reasons: 1. In February 2014, LX and his former partner instructed EU to act on their behalf in relation to sale of a jointly owned property. LX’s share of the final distribution of the net sale proceeds was $6,157.23. On 7 May 2014, EU mistakenly transferred this sum into his bank...