Search Results

1. LA OAJ Ltd v BK SJ Ltd UJ Ltd [2022] NZDT 83 (7 April 2022) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...substantially reduced below the income he received for the equivalent period the year before. I note that at the hearing I asked LA whether he had received any government subsidies for loss of earnings during the period and he was unable to recall this information but said he did receive them during lockdowns in the 2020. LA suggested that the weekly subsidy payable may have been around $600.00 per week. 36. I consider that given the uncertainty about the amount of likely earnings in th...

2. [2024] NZEmpC 236 Devine v Heart Kids NZ Ltd [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...to pursue those grievances.1 The remainder of Ms Devine’s claims also failed. The challenge [4] Ms Devine challenged the Authority’s determination. She elected to have a full hearing of the matters that were investigated. Despite the request for a full hearing the pleading in the amended statement of claim appears confined to pursuing allegations that Ms Devine was subjected to unjustified disadvantages in the course of her employment. The nature of those disadvantages i...

3. Tomokia Ngā Tatau o Matangireia: Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry (WAI 3300)

   ...attendance at one event. Funding to attend additional events will be considered on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the Ministry. A named claimant can apply for funding for themselves, or on behalf of a claimant witness or support person, by requesting the Ministry book travel and accommodation on behalf of claimants, where possible, or by completing a claimant funding reimbursement form. Either way we encourage claimants to contact us to discuss options before making travel arrangemen...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy

4. Shepherd & Ors as Trustees of the Bell Shepherd Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...hearing I was told that neither Mr Townsend nor Counsel had been aware of the company’s removal, and steps were being taken to have the company reinstated on the Register. Therefore, I am proceeding on the assumption that JTL is still a legally formed and registered company 3.8 The ninth respondent is Mr Peter Townsend, who is a director of JTL. The Owners claim that Mr Townsend has a personal liability for the claims that they Claim 00062 – Ponsonby Gardens Unit 7...

5. [2021] NZACC 8 - Stryder v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...advising that the appellant’s weekly compensation would stop as of Monday, 17 June 2019. [6] The circumstances in which payment of those entitlements would be recommenced was explained in that letter. [7] On 17 June 2019 the appellant gave the requested consent, with the result that the payments of weekly compensation were not stopped at that time. [8] However, late on Friday 21 June 2019, the appellant sent an email to the Corporation indicating that they no longer had co...

6. ND v BC [2022] NZDT 128 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...awarded to ND in this circumstance. Did BC misrepresent there would be a mechanical warranty with the van? [23] BC stated that he never said there would be a mechanical warranty with the van. However, ND provided evidence that in April 2022 BC had requested the mechanical warranty, the mechanical breakdown insurance policy to be transferred. The insurer QJ advised that BC’s circumstances did not meet the policy conditions because he was not the first owner insured under the policy...

7. WNO v Oranga Tamariki [2025] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...claims that Oranga Tamariki’s refusal to provide her with the redacted information interfered with her privacy in breach of the Privacy Act 2020 (PA). Oranga Tamariki denies WNO’s claim. BACKGROUND [4] From January 2020, WNO made several requests to Oranga Tamariki for her personal information. At the time of WNO’s requests, her child BPQ was in the care of Oranga Tamariki. Oranga Tamariki’s Customer Information Requests (CIR) team accordingly developed a plan to release...

8. QT v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 148 (10 April 2024) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...once a quote has been accepted. 13. I am satisfied that QT was not liable to pay the extra charge for the plumbing work, because this had been included in the fixed price quote, and so QT is entitled to a refund of $1,298.00 (including GST) form B Ltd. Was B Ltd liable to pay for a camera inspection of the sewer sleeving? 14. I find that the quote provided by B Ltd did not include a camera inspection of the sewer sleeving, and so B Ltd was not liable to arrange and pay for thi...

9. DD v B Ltd [2022] NZDT 258 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...charged) and a visit carried out in 2022 will need to be the subject of a separate claim as they had not been lodged via a counter-claim for today’s hearing. Referee Perfect Date: 20 December 2022 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. HB- & UB v KN [2023] NZDT 49 (9 February 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

    ...against KN is dismissed. It may be that the applicants consider they have claims against other parties. But that is a matter for the applicants to pursue. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 9 February 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...