Search Results

1. [2010] NZEmpC 142 Wang v Hamilton Multicultural Services Trust [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...sequence of events giving rise to the allegations of discrimination were a pre-cursor to the decision to restructure the management roles within the Trust. This included the plaintiff’s position as financial administrator. This is confirmed in the form of pleadings filed, particularly the statement of claim commencing the challenge in respect of the termination of employment. The issue of discrimination on the basis of ethnicity is raised in that claim as well as the claim base...

2. EM v JJ [2023] NZDT 254 (17 May 2023) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...substantial, the purchaser can cancel the sale and obtain a full refund, which the Tribunal so orders. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 17 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. Waitangi Tribunal - February 2016 Porirua ki Manawatū pānui [pdf, 816 KB]

   ...http://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/waitangi-tribunal/inquiries/district-inquiries/porirua-ki-manawatu http://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/waitangi-tribunal/inquiries/district-inquiries/porirua-ki-manawatu 4 | I S S U E T W O Quick tip: Accessing documents via our website Waitangi Tribunal staff receive numerous requests for inquiry documents and while we are always happy to assist, there is a quicker and easier way for claimants and counsel to find documents whe...

4. DN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction) [2023] NZACC 75 [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...injury and post-traumatic stress disorder suffered in a sexual assault on 22 April 2011. [3] The appellant also has cover for a concussion injury and a traumatic amputation of the right finger suffered in an accident on 26 February 2011. [4] The claim for cover for the physical injury suffered in the assault was made by the appellant on 16 January 2013. ACC approved exploratory surgery on 9 May 2013. [5] ACC subsequently granted cover for post-traumatic stress disorder. Howeve...

5. DS v VH Ltd [2016] NZDT 898 (11 February 2016) [pdf, 24 KB]

   ...contained in the CGA. However, the issues in dispute are of a contractual nature, specifically whether or not the deposit is refundable. DS claims a refund of the $1,000.00 deposit. Issues [5] The issues to determine are:. a. Was a contract formed when DS paid the deposit and signed the handwritten document, and if so, what was the nature of the contract? b. Was DS in breach of the contract by cancelling two days later? c. Is DS entitled to a refund of the deposi...

6. HK Ltd v MO Ltd [2022] NZDT 120 (3 August 2022) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...not need to be addressed, and MO LTD is liable to pay the balance of the contract price. Once this is paid, HK LTD is to deliver the Type B shelves to MO LTD. Referee: J Perfect Date: 3 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. Brown v Otago Polytechnic and Progressive Enterprises (Recusal Application) [2014] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...making unfavourable decisions. Mr. Haines adjudication of my complaints amounts to transparent violations of my Civil Rights and the Crimes Act, and therefore it is only fitting that Mr. Haines stand down as adjudicator of my complaints. Mr Brown requested to give particulars of his complaint [11] As it was not clear whether this letter was a complaint in relation to the Otago Polytechnic proceedings (HRRT003/13) or those against Progressive Enterprises Ltd (HRRT004/13) or both, the...

8. E and E v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0013 [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...SOMERVILLE DATED 18 December 2019 ___________________________________________________________________________ Case stated [1] The respondent (IAG) has filed an application for referral of a question of law. That application, which took the form of a memorandum of counsel, outlined the question of law for which it sought referral and attached a draft case stated. The application was served on the other parties but only the applicants and the third respondent (QBE)...

9. DD & UD v AX & Ors [2024] NZDT 187 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...issued because the boss was angry when he found out their salesperson had given the [courtesy car] to DD and UD without authority. That, of course, is not N Ltd’s customers’ responsibility, and N Ltd’s recognition that hire payment is not due, is formalised via a declaration of non-liability. Are UD/DD liable to pay costs of repair to the [courtesy car]? 20. The circumstances of UD’s collision are such that, in the ordinary course of events, she would be liable to pay for...

10. BE v TT Ltd & Ors [2024] NZDT 838 (18 November 2024) [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...poor condition and needs replacement? b. Did the Respondents misrepresent the condition of the roof? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 c. Can BE prove that vendors knew about the poor condition of the roof and have they withheld this information from her? Can BE prove that the roof is in poor condition and needs replacement? 7. BE she hired a builder to replace windows in the property with double-glazed windows in May 2024. The same builder was also asked to clean the gut...