Search Results

1. N Ltd v DS [2024] NZDT 416 (21 May 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...by the end of January. Given that N Ltd agreed to the removal of the signs, I do not consider that Q Trust can be liable to contribute to the costs of doing so. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 21 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. SG v S Ltd [2024] NZDT 557 (5 July 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...therefore completed with reasonable skill and care. 11. The claim against S Ltd must be dismissed and I am not required to consider the remaining issues. Referee: C Murphy Date: 5 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. CD Ltd v BM [2024] NZDT 396 (10 June 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...materials $ 162.36 Plus finishing lines $ 149.23 $2416.09 Plus GST $ 362.41 $2778.50 Less paid $1052.25 Balance to be paid $1726.25 Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 10 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

4. QH v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 891 (13 December 2024) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...group of defective vehicles and that because the issue is well-known in these types of vehicles, the resale value is affected. The difficulty with this argument is that QH has only supplied anecdotal evidence from web forums and other online platforms, unsupported by mechanical or other expert evidence. QH said that he had spoken to various experts, but none of them were prepared to make formal statements in case it damaged their commercial interests. 12. QH said that when his vehicl...

5. UI v DW Ltd [2021] NZDT 1528 (8 September 2021) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...for an abdominal scan. The specialist suggested by EH could not see Brownie until the following Tuesday. UI considered Brownie too ill to wait until then, so she phoned N and I in [City] who were able to see Brownie that day. An ultrasound scan performed by N and I on Friday 14 December confirmed fulminant pancreatitis with some oedematous areas with risk of abscessation. Brownie was, as described by Dr N of N and I, “very very sick”, and he went on to receive intensive care treatment...

6. RI v Hart LCRO 158 / 2011 (13 July 2012) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...In conjunction with the adjournment, consent was again sought from Mr Hart to the matter being dealt with on the papers as I considered all material necessary to complete the review was available on the files. [11] On 20 April 2012, a follow-up request was sent to Mr Hart. No reply was received and thereafter, the Case Manager had extreme difficulty in obtaining a response from him. On 8 May 2012, I therefore issued a Minute which included the following: [8] Given the difficulty...

7. Waitangi Tribunal - Strategic direction 2014 to 2025 [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...means comprehensively tackling all claims before us and those yet to be filed. To that end, we have adopted a long-term strategic framework that sets out the main components of the Tribunal’s future inquiry programme. This includes both established forms of inquiry, such as the district inquiries under way, and innovative, new pathways to deal with remaining historical claims, kaupapa claims, and contemporary claims. Achieving the strategic goals outlined in this document will enable the...

8. Waitangi Tribunal - 2014 to 2025 strategic direction [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...means comprehensively tackling all claims before us and those yet to be filed. To that end, we have adopted a long-term strategic framework that sets out the main components of the Tribunal’s future inquiry programme. This includes both established forms of inquiry, such as the district inquiries under way, and innovative, new pathways to deal with remaining historical claims, kaupapa claims, and contemporary claims. Achieving the strategic goals outlined in this document will enable the...

9. Waitangi Tribunal Strategic Direction 2014-2025 [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...means comprehensively tackling all claims before us and those yet to be filed. To that end, we have adopted a long-term strategic framework that sets out the main components of the Tribunal’s future inquiry programme. This includes both established forms of inquiry, such as the district inquiries under way, and innovative, new pathways to deal with remaining historical claims, kaupapa claims, and contemporary claims. Achieving the strategic goals outlined in this document will enable the...

10. HRRT-Guide-on-How-to-Complete-and-Serve-a-Claim.pdf [pdf, 144 KB]

    Use this guide This guide provides you with information on how to complete and serve a Notice of Proceeding and Letter of Notification. This guide uses the terms plaintiff, defendant, and statement of claim but for certain proceedings under the Privacy Act 2020 these terms should be read as applicant, respondent, and application form as applicable. What is a Notice of Proceeding and Letter of Notification In accordance with regulation12 of the Human Rights Review Tribun...