Search Results

1. Chand v Devi [2015] NZIACDT 74 (12 June 2015) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...provisions require a licensed immigration adviser to comply with immigration legislation and maintain professional business practices related to staff. The circumstances supporting this allegation were: [4.2.1] Ms Devi used unlicensed staff to perform a significant component of her immigration services. [4.2.2] All correspondence with Immigration New Zealand was in her name and she signed the complainant’s work visa application as his adviser on 15 June 2011. However, she had no con...

2. Baker - Part Lot 1 DP 13787 (formerly Pt Tarawera 5A) (2015) 41 Tākitimu MB 281 (41 TKT 281) [pdf, 256 KB]

   41 Tākitimu MB 281 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20150001006 UNDER Section 18(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Part Lot 1 DP 13787 (formerly Pt Tarawera 5A) NIGEL BAKER Applicant THE TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS BAKER WHĀNAU TRUST Interested Party Hearing

3. [2016] NZEmpC 109 Dotcom v Orduna [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...proceedings under EMPC 86/2016 are Mr Dotcom’s cross-challenge to the same determination of the Authority issued on 11 March 2016 as to the matters found against him by the Authority. The allegations, admissions and denials in the pleadings likewise form the background to document disclosure issues. [6] At the heart of these proceedings are the questions of whether Mr Dotcom was the employer; and, if so, whether the individual parties were disadvantaged or dismissed unjustifiably...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 035 Taylor v Small [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...memorandum was filed and hearing dates of 25 and 26 July 2018 agreed. A timetable for evidence was imposed based on the parties' suggestions. 3 The evidence timetable was later extended, and the potential hearing date was adjourned at the request of both parties.4 Judicial telephone conference: the Court was advised that the filing of evidence had been completed and a report date of 3 August 2018 suggested to outline the outcome of a settlement meeting and advise whether a...

5. AG Ltd v SQ [2018] NZDT 1443 (30 October 2018) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...disclosure requirements changed on 1 June 2015. This contract was dated 28 August 2015, so the new disclosure requirements applied. 9. AG Ltd’s contract with SQ does not comply with the disclosure requirements as it does not disclose all the information it was required to under Schedule 1 CCCFA. It does not set out the debtor’s right to apply for relief on grounds of unforeseen hardship, it does not provide any statement about disabling devices, the cancellation provisions ar...

6. SX v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 160 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...and the applicant is not entitled to any further refund. 10. For these reasons, the applicant’s claim against the respondent is dismissed. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 2 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. DL Ltd v DX [2023] NZDT 647 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...breach her duty of care by removing the sign. There is no evidence to prove that DX took the sign. Therefore, the claim for $89.00 plus GST is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 6 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

8. BF & NF v BN Ltd [2023] NZDT 24 (19 January 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...Guarantees Act that relate to the damage to their possessions, as this must be considered under the CCLA. 11. For these reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: DTR Unasa Date: 19 January 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

9. TS & BS v KI [2023] NZDT 63 (16 February 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...find KI liable to pay a total of $6037.01 as ordered above. 10. The counterclaim is dismissed as I have found KI wholly liable for the losses incurred. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 16 February 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. NX & QT v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 209 (28 April 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...their flight and then confirmed their choices by clicking ‘Confirm’ at the bottom of the page. The credit card details were accepted and the amounts for the fares were flagged on hold on their credit card statement. However, they were then informed that the flight was unavailable. NX and QT said that after attempting the booking again that the price had increased significantly. They called X Ltd but the person spoken to was unable to make the booking either. NX and QT believe that...