Search Results

1. KK & PM v S Ltd & SH Ltd [2023] NZDT 43 (23 January 2023) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...professional, despite black pipes being present and the house being constructed during the period when those pipes were used. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 7 13. KK and PM submitted that at the very least the report should have informed them of the possibility that some of the pipes may have been the original Dux Quest piping that was prone to splitting and leaking, both along the pipe and also at the joins. 14. EQ agreed that he would notify his client of the presenc...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 109 Dotcom v Orduna [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...proceedings under EMPC 86/2016 are Mr Dotcom’s cross-challenge to the same determination of the Authority issued on 11 March 2016 as to the matters found against him by the Authority. The allegations, admissions and denials in the pleadings likewise form the background to document disclosure issues. [6] At the heart of these proceedings are the questions of whether Mr Dotcom was the employer; and, if so, whether the individual parties were disadvantaged or dismissed unjustifiably...

3. LCRO 184/2015 WD v YR (6 July 2017) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...[30] The application for review was not withdrawn and in October 2016 Mr WD provided a “Complete statement for LCRO hearing” which was forwarded to Mr YR.20 [31] No further comment was received from Mr YR, and in November 2016 this Office requested consent from both parties for the review to be completed on the material to hand. Both parties provided their consent and the review was scheduled for completion on the papers.21 [32] On 27 February 2017 this Office received a docum...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 035 Taylor v Small [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...memorandum was filed and hearing dates of 25 and 26 July 2018 agreed. A timetable for evidence was imposed based on the parties' suggestions. 3 The evidence timetable was later extended, and the potential hearing date was adjourned at the request of both parties.4 Judicial telephone conference: the Court was advised that the filing of evidence had been completed and a report date of 3 August 2018 suggested to outline the outcome of a settlement meeting and advise whether a...

5. [2021] NZACC 156 - Holton v ACC (4 October 2021) [pdf, 380 KB]

   ...the time was visiting friends and the attack took place as he was putting his twin children into a vehicle prior to departure. [5] The same day the appellant was assessed by the Accident and Emergency Clinic, Lincoln Road, Henderson. The ACC claim form submitted the same day described what happened as follows: Attacked – inj back/L hand/R hand/laceration R elbow – machete. [6] At the time the appellant was working as a boat builder with Holton Marine. [7] He was referred f...

6. SR v GI [2016] NZDT 1070 (17 February 2016) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...coffee machine money and the plastics, neither of these arrangements were intended to give rise to legally binding obligations. The parties made their arrangements loosely as friends on a basis of personal trust and reciprocity, where each of them performed favours for the other and expected favours in return, without any monetary value being put on these favours or clear terms being negotiated or recorded. [9] Mr SR stated that he wanted to get back what is his because Mr GI cut hi...

7. WHT - Chair's directions for lower value claims [pdf, 174 KB]

   Weathertight Homes Tribunal Chair’s Directions for lower value claims page 1 of 5 CHAIR’S DIRECTIONS (for Lower Value Claims) 1. Introduction 1.1 These directions are effective from 14 September 2015 and are issued pursuant to s 114 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act) and set out the procedure which is to apply to all applications in the Weathertight Homes Tribunal where the amount claimed is under $20,000 (lower value claims). 2. How the...

8. WHT Claims under $20k - Chair's Directions [pdf, 174 KB]

   Weathertight Homes Tribunal Chair’s Directions for lower value claims page 1 of 5 CHAIR’S DIRECTIONS (for Lower Value Claims) 1. Introduction 1.1 These directions are effective from 14 September 2015 and are issued pursuant to s 114 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act) and set out the procedure which is to apply to all applications in the Weathertight Homes Tribunal where the amount claimed is under $20,000 (lower value claims). 2. How the...

9. Baker - Part Lot 1 DP 13787 (formerly Pt Tarawera 5A) (2015) 41 Tākitimu MB 281 (41 TKT 281) [pdf, 256 KB]

   41 Tākitimu MB 281 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20150001006 UNDER Section 18(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Part Lot 1 DP 13787 (formerly Pt Tarawera 5A) NIGEL BAKER Applicant THE TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS BAKER WHĀNAU TRUST Interested Party Hearing

10. Moore - Waitara East Section 81 B [2018] Chief Judge's MB 842 (2018 CJ 842) [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...4.10(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 seeking to review the Registrar’s decision to refuse to file an application made by him on 7 May 2018 pursuant to s 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (A20180003483). [2] Following a number of requests to Mr Moore to provide further information, the Registrar informed the applicant by letter dated 10 August 2018 of her decision to refuse to file the application on the basis that it did not comply with r 8.2(2)(b) of the Māori Land