Search Results

1. ET v SK [2023] NZDT 131 (5 March 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...satisfied the campervan was most probably sold ‘in trade’. This is because I accept F Ltd provided services to BC service and ceased trading by 31 March 2019 which is when it advised Inland Revenue it ceased trading by way of a completed IR 315 form. The campervan is not listed as a retained asset of that company in CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 that form. I am not therefore persuaded the CGA or FTA applied to the sale and so compensation is not available to ET by consi...

2. SX v A Ltd [2023] NZDT 462 (19 September 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...following their installation instructions, and the installer, [plumbing company], has refuted this in writing saying that they believe it to be a product fault. Referee Perfect Date: 19 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. NM & S Ltd v PT [2023] NZDT 679 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...the second roof at cost was concluded; and iii. I did not find that the recordings of conversations between NM (who has left the company) and PT in December and January well after the quote had been accepted, and also after the work had been performed, favoured PT’s position. Instead, I found the essence of those conversations and comments such as “just say [NM] said will do both sides …. won’t have to pay any more” presented as collusion between the two, in an effort to get...

4. T Ltd v EH & Ors [2024] NZDT 789 (6 October 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...cross notice. Such notice was not given and T Ltd is not entitled to a contribution from its neighbours, the H’s. For these reasons I must dismiss the claim. Referee: C Murphy Date: 6 October 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

5. XL v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 466 (7 June 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...actual costs of repairing damage sustained while the truck was hired to XL, even though the truck was hired to multiple other parties before a repair was arranged. Referee Perfect Date: 7 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

6. KT v EP [2024] NZDT 600 (30 August 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...claimed be compensated $4,999.95 and as that amount is less than the reasonably foreseeable loss he has incurred, an order is made for that amount. Referee: Ms Cowie DTR Date: 30 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. Te Awe Awe v Te Awe Awe-Bevan - Pt Rangitikei Manawatu Pt B4 (2016) 354 Aotea MB 213 (354 AOT 213) [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...Manawatu B4A Reservation and Rangitikei-Manawatu B4 Part (Rangiotu School) Reservation seek the removal of Brigitte Te Awe Awe-Bevan as a trustee. They say that she has not attended trustee meetings for two years, has failed to comply with trustee requests for information, has displayed a lack of cooperation and participation and has failed to perform her role as secretary and treasurer in a satisfactory manner. [2] Ms Te Awe Awe-Bevan denies the allegations. She says that she has...

8. Lomax v Apatu – Awarua o Hinemanu Trust (2013) 22 Takitimu MB 282 (22 TKT 282) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...the trustees, the Trust has not held a general meeting of beneficial owners for at least six years. In addition, annual accounts for the 2011, 2012 and 2013 financial years have not been filed. The case for Ngahapeparatuae Lomax [16] Mr Lomax claimed that Ashley Apatu had approached him several years ago with a request that his son Wilson Apatu be permitted to occupy the Hinemanu Hut. Mr Lomax further says that he and the trustees had some sympathy for Mr Apatu because his son had...

9. Form-30_Family-Invoice_Adoption.pdf [pdf, 217 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 30 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Adoption Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Please record t...

10. Singh v McKee [2024] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 259 KB]

    ...by Mr McKee’s late father and from 2017 was owned by Mr McKee. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Singh v McKee [2024] NZHRRT 3.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 3 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Mr Singh claims that during his employment, Mr McKee subjected him to racial harassment in breach of s 63 of the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA) as he commented on and made fun of his Indian accent, made belittling remarks about Indians and objected to hi...