Search Results

1. XD v KA [2023] NZDT 348 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...address to the Tribunal but did give an email address. 6. An adjournment was granted on the basis that BX said he was on a plane preparing to fly to China. Subsequently, the telephone line dropped out. It was clearly necessary to gather more information about the respondent. 7. A further hearing was held on 8 June 2023. At that hearing BX again answered the telephone. At this hearing he said that although he knew KA and was involved in the transaction when XD bought the fish b...

2. LA v KD [2023] NZDT 260 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...than not either. 18. Given that I am unable to make a finding that KD’s driving caused or contributed to the collision the claim must be dismissed. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 8 June 2923 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. MQ v X Ltd & N Ltd [2024] NZDT 72 (19 February 2024) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...interior of the vehicle? 21. Part of MQ’s claim is the cost of cleaning the vehicle to remove the substantial amount of dust that was in the interior when he collected it. MQ also submitted that there was paint overspray on the interior. 1 Formerly the Carriage of Goods Act 1979, now sections 241-295 of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (“CCLA”) 2 Section 273(1)(a) CCLA CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 22. Mr S (X Ltd) acknowledged that there was dust i...

4. EI v EE Ltd [2024] NZDT 529 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...however, I am satisfied EE Ltd has offered reasonable compensation, which is relative to the circumstances, and therefore EI’s claim must be dismissed. Referee: Malthus Date: 3 July 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

5. Q Ltd v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 853 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. N Ltd is to pay Q Ltd the sum of $20,000 on or before 18 October 2024. 2. The counterclaim by N Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. Q Ltd is a co-operative management company formed by a number of [redacted] orchard owners in the [Town] area. It was represented at the hearing by TE who is a director of the company, and whose orchard holds shares in Q Ltd. 2. N Ltd is also a shareholder of Q Ltd and its directo...

6. J Ltd v PE Ltd [2024] NZDT 357 (9 March 2024) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...reasons the remaining issues need not be determined, and a declaration of non- liability for the amount of J Ltd’s final invoice is made as stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 9 March 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. AG Ltd v SQ [2018] NZDT 1443 (30 October 2018) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...disclosure requirements changed on 1 June 2015. This contract was dated 28 August 2015, so the new disclosure requirements applied. 9. AG Ltd’s contract with SQ does not comply with the disclosure requirements as it does not disclose all the information it was required to under Schedule 1 CCCFA. It does not set out the debtor’s right to apply for relief on grounds of unforeseen hardship, it does not provide any statement about disabling devices, the cancellation provisions ar...

8. SX v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 160 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...and the applicant is not entitled to any further refund. 10. For these reasons, the applicant’s claim against the respondent is dismissed. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 2 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

9. DL Ltd v DX [2023] NZDT 647 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...breach her duty of care by removing the sign. There is no evidence to prove that DX took the sign. Therefore, the claim for $89.00 plus GST is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 6 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

10. BF & NF v BN Ltd [2023] NZDT 24 (19 January 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...Guarantees Act that relate to the damage to their possessions, as this must be considered under the CCLA. 11. For these reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: DTR Unasa Date: 19 January 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...