Search Results

1. BZ v OJ [2023] NZDT 221 (24 April 2023) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...about the overall condition of the van, but rather a more specific comment. In any event, OJ said he qualified this statement but telling BZ that the van had not been used recently. In essence he was signalling that he did not have up to date information about the van. 16. OJ said he did not say that the van would “breeze through a WOF”. He accepted he might have said that she should not have any problems taking it for a WOF as far as he knew. He said that he would not have mad...

2. KD & DF v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 775 (20 August 2024) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...workmanship into the future, as the respondent does himself. 29. Accordingly my order is as above, and the respondent’s counter-claim is dismissed. Referee: John Hogan Date: 20 August 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

3. N Ltd v DS [2024] NZDT 416 (21 May 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...by the end of January. Given that N Ltd agreed to the removal of the signs, I do not consider that Q Trust can be liable to contribute to the costs of doing so. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 21 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

4. SG v S Ltd [2024] NZDT 557 (5 July 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...therefore completed with reasonable skill and care. 11. The claim against S Ltd must be dismissed and I am not required to consider the remaining issues. Referee: C Murphy Date: 5 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. CD Ltd v BM [2024] NZDT 396 (10 June 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...materials $ 162.36 Plus finishing lines $ 149.23 $2416.09 Plus GST $ 362.41 $2778.50 Less paid $1052.25 Balance to be paid $1726.25 Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 10 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

6. QH v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 891 (13 December 2024) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...group of defective vehicles and that because the issue is well-known in these types of vehicles, the resale value is affected. The difficulty with this argument is that QH has only supplied anecdotal evidence from web forums and other online platforms, unsupported by mechanical or other expert evidence. QH said that he had spoken to various experts, but none of them were prepared to make formal statements in case it damaged their commercial interests. 12. QH said that when his vehicl...

7. KT & AT v N Ltd & Ors [2025] NZDT 148 (29 May 2025) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...MN. Conclusion 14. As I have found that KT and AT are entitled to have their land remediated, an order is made for the amount of their claim. K Cowie Disputes Tribunal Referee 29 May 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. OC v S Ltd [2025] NZDT 162 (12 May 2025) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...it does not involve digging out and replacing the base, therefore, it may not properly remedy the problem. 8. In conclusion, the claim is proved. S Grayson Disputes Tribunal Referee 12 May 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

9. UI v DW Ltd [2021] NZDT 1528 (8 September 2021) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...for an abdominal scan. The specialist suggested by EH could not see Brownie until the following Tuesday. UI considered Brownie too ill to wait until then, so she phoned N and I in [City] who were able to see Brownie that day. An ultrasound scan performed by N and I on Friday 14 December confirmed fulminant pancreatitis with some oedematous areas with risk of abscessation. Brownie was, as described by Dr N of N and I, “very very sick”, and he went on to receive intensive care treatment...

10. Pinnock & Ors as Trustees of the Pinnock Trust v Auckland City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 28 [pdf, 373 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000044 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 28 BETWEEN RALPH ERNEST KENNEDY PINNOCK, ADRIANA LUCY PINNOCK AND PETER BRUCE JACOBSON as Trustees of the PINNOCK TRUST Claimant AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND DAVID WOOD Second Respondent AND ROWAN NIGEL COLE Third Respondent AND ROY RAWSON Fourth Respondent AND NISHAR MOHAMMED Fifth Respondent AND EASTRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LIMITED (Removed) Sixth Respond