10901 items matching your search terms
Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 23c Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules A, B & C: Police Prosecutions Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fe...
Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 23d Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules A, B & C: Police Prosecutions Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed f...
...is not inclined to apply to the High Court for an order to allow proceedings in the Disputes Tribunal to continue. 5. This proceeding is therefore struck out. Referee: P Moses Date: 8 April 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
...of the rear bumper – LD’s view is that this is consistent with SQ’s vehicle having hit a pole or something similar at the corner with the bumper area having been shunted sideways, referring damage to the left- hand side. 5. Based on the information available, I find that even if LD’s vehicle did make contact with SQ’s, and there is no physical evidence to prove that there is insufficient evidence to prove that any loss was caused, because SQ’s vehicle looks to have been in a...
...and is not liable for the loss, therefore the contract fee is not refundable, and the claim must be dismissed. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 11 August 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
...DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 680 APPLICANT KY and LZ RESPONDENT SE The Tribunal orders: SE is to pay $3000.00 to KY and LZ on or before 26 January 2024. Reasons 1. KY and LZ purchased a [vehicle] from SE via [online platform] on 15 February 2023, paying him $3000.00 for the car. 2. Within a few weeks of SE delivering the car to them, [Car Rental Company] repossessed the car, showing KY and LZ proof of ownership and providing them with documents detailing SE...
...not pursue the claims vigorously after 2006 because they only affected a minority of the Union’s members and because similar issues were then before the courts. [18] Although the substance of the annual holidays provisions did not change, the form of them was tidied up by the removal in the 2008/2009 agreement of the first paragraph of cl 9(g)(ii). Thus, the provision which must be construed and applied in this case is: (g) The provisions of the Holidays Act 2003 and any Act pa...
...the terms as detailed in paragraph 1 above. 5. If the Authority has in mind making a referral back on terms additional to that proposed here, then counsel would first require to be heard. [7] The appeal decision is therefore intended to form the basis for the investigation of Hiria’s claim under s 2(a)(i) and records the relevant background facts and medical information that have a bearing on the consideration of the claim in light of Mitchell, and the directions that wil...
...was made redundant from her part-time job. 2. The contract was on a contingency basis and the terms of engagement provided that, unless the case was completed and lost, a fee would be payable, either a percentage of amounts paid to MD by her former employer or a termination fee in specified circumstances (with amounts prescribed by the contract based on the type of work performed by GL Ltd prior to termination). 3. As MD’s former employer did not agree to voluntary mediation, BC...
...or more for each day of investigation meeting would have been appropriate. The Authority recorded that the investigation meeting that occupied about two days although part of the second day was used for an attempt by the parties to resolve the claims using a facilitator. [8] The Authority referred to other cases of awards reaching a total of $7,000 or even more, but concluded that there were compelling circumstances in the present case pointing to an award of much less than that...