Search Results

1. TC & TD v NV LCRO 255 / 2011 (14 January 2013) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...which time NV responded. He advised that he had not noted TC’s email of 16 September and then requested further information as to the date to which ground rental was paid. Finally, on 31 October, he sent a letter to the purchaser’s solicitor requesting payment of the amount due by the purchaser being $1,537.50. [15] The purchaser’s solicitor responded advising that the tenant of the property was in financial difficulties and had not paid rental and outgoings for the month of...

2. Roborgh v Lay [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...hearing I was told that neither Mr Townsend nor Counsel had been aware of the company’s removal, and steps were being taken to have the company reinstated on the Register. Therefore, I am proceeding on the assumption that JTL is still a legally formed and registered company 3.8 The ninth respondent is Mr Peter Townsend, who is a director of JTL. The Owners claim that Mr Townsend has a personal liability for the claims that they have made against JTL. I will need to determine...

3. Chand v Devi [2015] NZIACDT 74 (12 June 2015) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...provisions require a licensed immigration adviser to comply with immigration legislation and maintain professional business practices related to staff. The circumstances supporting this allegation were: [4.2.1] Ms Devi used unlicensed staff to perform a significant component of her immigration services. [4.2.2] All correspondence with Immigration New Zealand was in her name and she signed the complainant’s work visa application as his adviser on 15 June 2011. However, she had no con...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 29 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd [pdf, 330 KB]

   ...email chain and its import is somewhat ambiguous. On 8 December 2011 Ms Bondini sent an email to Mr Hoogasian, copying in Mr Piccione (Chief Counsel – Mergers and Acquisitions and Employment for Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, United States), requesting that Mr Hoogasian: … provide Amanda Cameron with full delegated authority to investigate the actions regarding the allegations against Peter Hall and to take disciplinary action which may be necessary.

5. BF v BN [2021] NZDT 1412 (1 April 2021) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...any benefit from, they are not losses directly relevant to the misrepresentation. Consequently, I decline to award any costs under this heading. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 1 April 2021 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

6. NL v DN & LJ Trust [2021] NZDT 1567 (30 June 2021) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...December 2020. Therefore, I am satisfied, on the balance of probabilities that NL is not entitled to claim a refund. Accordingly, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Fuli Date: 30 June 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. BN & UG v EI [2023] NZDT 234 (22 May 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...the same mistake; and where each party was influenced in their decisions to enter into the contract by a different mistake about the same matter of fact. Further, for s24 of the CCLA to apply, the mistake must have occurred before the contract was formed and there must have been a substantially unequal exchange of value because of the mistake (s24(1) of the CCLA). 16. Having carefully considered the available evidence and information, I am satisfied that no mistake was made by BN and...

8. TC v L Ltd & WC [2024] NZDT 898 (6 December 2024) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...Ltd but was told it was ‘WC’s job’. Over the following months TC attempted to contact WC to find a remedy for her cracked panes. She said that he made lots of promises to provide a remedy, but none eventuated. During this time, more cracks formed, and the condition of the windows continued to deteriorate. TC attempted to seek a remedy from L Ltd but was told that WC was not an employee of L Ltd, that L Ltd does not sell the T Ltd product, and that L Ltd had not received any paym...

9. ST v UF Ltd 2020 NZDT 1410 (17 June 2020) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...warranties for building work in relation to household units and at section 1 provides: "In every contract to which this section applies, the following warranties about building work to be carried out under the contract are implied and are taken to form part of the contract: (a) That the building work will be carried out (ii) in accordance with the plans and specifications set out in the contract" CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 6. The outcome of a grey floor with...

10. DN v DD Ltd [2022] NZDT 61 (28 June 2022) [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...said after G was injured that were more about ‘lightening’ a terrible situation and trying to make ND feel better about what had happened in the context of their friendship. I accept that and give no weight to the contents of these private and informal communications. 11. DN also says though that they always secure the dogs before leaving the property and that he expected ND would do the same. Although DN said at the hearing that he asked ND to “put them inside the house if you...