Search Results

1. CH v SU [2024] NZDT 868 (5 December 2024) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...neighbour’s [vehicle 1] with damage to the right-hand side of the vehicle. HM also observed one other motor vehicle on the road being the rear end of a lime green [vehicle 2] travelling in a southerly direction towards the [Street] intersection. HM informed CH about what he observed and subsequently made a statement which has been disclosed. 3) CH with knowledge that a lime green [vehicle 2] may have been involved embarked upon an exercise to track down the owners of lime green [vehi...

2. Williams v Cotter-Arlidge - Okaihau 3C2 (2019) 77 Tākitimu MB 51 (77 TKT 51) [pdf, 416 KB]

   ...Cotter-Arlidge, Mere Manning and Hana Cotter in person Judgment: 18 July 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] Kevin Williams is an accountant trading as Kevin Williams & Associates. He seeks payment for accounting services he claims were rendered to the Okaihau 3C2 Ahu Whenua Trust. He also says that he was engaged for the work charged for but has not been paid and to that end he has applied for a review of the trust. [2] The trustees deny the claim....

3. [2021] NZEmpC 19 Restaurant Brands Ltd v Unite Inc [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...at various locations across New Zealand. [2] Unite says that Restaurant Brands’ current statement of claim does not comply with reg 11(1)(d) of the Employment Court Regulations 2000 (the Regulations). It is Restaurant Brands’ claims for special damages that are in issue before the Court. [3] Unite applies for an order that the claims for money relief in the proceedings be struck out (other than costs), or, alternatively, an order that a compliant statement of cla...

4. FAQs

   On this page you'll find answers to some commonly asked questions. More information can be found within the website and in the Homeowners' Guide to the Tribunal. Who can apply to the Tribunal? Why won’t the Tribunal look at Kaikōura claims? Does the Tribunal consider claims involving on-sold properties? Does the Tribunal consider claims involving builders or other parties? What about claims that are with the courts? Where is the Tribunal located? When can claims be filed

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal

5. Newel [2013] NZWHT Auckland 19 [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...“built”. [7] Lang J also considered the effect of s 43(1) of the Building Act 1991 which provides as follows: 43 Code compliance certificate (1) An owner shall as soon as practicable advise the territorial authority, in the prescribed form, that the building work has been completed to the extent required by the building consent issued in respect of that building work. [8] He concluded that if this reasoning is applied to the consideration of the built- by...

6. Family legal aid fees - consultation paper [pdf, 816 KB]

   ...approach 7 Provider rates and hearing activities 7 New policy 8 Case management levels 8 Amendments to grants 8 Amendment criteria 9 Non-lawyer costs and agents’ fees 9 Applications received before and after the July 2012 start date 9 New forms 9 Changes to existing policy 9 Reassignment policy 9 Consultation feedback 11 Questions 11 Proposed Family Fees Schedules: 12 4 Introduction he Ministry of Justice is introducing a new fee framework for fam...

7. Legal aid final family consultation paper - 10 February 2012 [pdf, 816 KB]

   ...approach 7 Provider rates and hearing activities 7 New policy 8 Case management levels 8 Amendments to grants 8 Amendment criteria 9 Non-lawyer costs and agents’ fees 9 Applications received before and after the July 2012 start date 9 New forms 9 Changes to existing policy 9 Reassignment policy 9 Consultation feedback 11 Questions 11 Proposed Family Fees Schedules: 12 4 Introduction he Ministry of Justice is introducing a new fee framework for fam...

8. [2016] NZEmpC 36 Western Bay of Plenty DHB v McInnes [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...that concerns have been raised about his interaction with certain park user groups over time. It is also apparent that concerns around a tendency to escalate situations of potential conflict has been an ongoing issue raised with Mr McInnes in performance reviews. Mr McInnes’ 2010 review recorded an acknowledgement that he understood and agreed to seek after-hours direction from the park manager if he was in doubt. The performance review for 2011 noted that Mr McInnes recognised a...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 48 Nelson v Katavich [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...Katavich said that in this way he was involved in setting up approximately 15 radio stations throughout New Zealand. As his business grew, he began to realise that there was a worldwide demand for his internet services and he began to receive requests from people in other countries such as the USA, Australia and the United Kingdom for advice on setting up radio stations. He described how it was necessary for him to carry out a great deal of research into what was involved because,...

10. Legal aid fee schedule for CMM [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...required to be in the courtroom. Waiting time is payable in half hour blocks, rounded up to the nearest half hour. If more one hour’s waiting time is claimed per activity (eg, waiting time for trial or waiting time for sentencing), the following information is required: A summary of both the waiting time and hearing time on the day of appearance – date and times. If waiting time exceeds one hour for an appearance or appearances on a particular day, an explanation of the circu...