Search Results

1. Jarvie & Ors v Accident Compensation Corporation (Reviewable decision) [2025] NZACC 41 (5 March 2025) [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...dated 19 March 2018 stating that the Corporation’s letter had not addressed any of the claimants’ concerns. Further, none of the claimants had responded to the letter as they were not sure why they had to provide the additional information requested. [8] The Corporation responded on 10 April 2018 advising: Each situation is assessed on the client’s individual circumstances and needs and therefore information is requested from the client in order for ACC to understand both...

2. Gorgus v Corrections [2023] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 316 KB]

   ...interference with Mr Gorgus’ privacy. Corrections has appropriately accepted this, as it failed to acknowledge or action either of those requests as required by PA, ss 40 and 66(4), without any proper basis. It is to that interference that any claimed causation must attach when the question of remedies is considered in relation to the First Request and Second Request. WHETHER CORRECTIONS HAS GOOD REASONS FOR WITHHOLDING OR REDACTING PERSONAL INFORMATION [32] Corrections submits tha...

3. [2014] NZEmpC 153 Roy v BOT of Tamaki College [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...circumstances, Mr Roy elected to await the provision to him of a copy of the Board’s report to the NZTC which it was obliged statutorily to make “immediately” following his resignation with effect from 11 October 2010. [33] Although Mr Roy did not request the Board to provide to him its reasons for the actions which he says amounted to his constructive dismissal (pursuant to s 120 of the Act), what he did subsequently was tantamount to doing so. From 30 September 2010 Mr Ro...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 68 Army Surplus Disposals Ltd v Reed [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...produce this book to the Authority. (d) Mr Doyle claimed he could provide further evidence that Mr Reed received the money alleged if he was given time. The Authority Member allowed Mr Doyle 10 days following the investigation to provide this information but he failed to do so. [5] The determination records findings and orders as follows: [7] By operating its business on a cash basis, without documentation, the respondent has put itself in a vulnerable position. In the absence...

5. UM v PH Ltd [2021] NZDT 1682 (14 December 2021) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...because they were not of acceptable quality or were unfit for their purpose. The necessary proof is simply lacking, and UM’s claim must therefore be dismissed. Referee: C Hawes Date: 14 December 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

6. KM & LM v BN [2023] NZDT 181 (12 July 2023) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...more; and b. BN is not entitled to a refund of the amount that she has paid. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 12 July 2023 (date of issuance of amended Order) Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. DC v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 642 (13 November 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...CJ LTD tested the battery and provided data to T Ltd. T Ltd does not have (and has never had) physical possession of the battery. b. The data is inconclusive in terms of the reason for the failure. The results show no sign of reduction in performance over time, which is the common symptom of cell balance. This aligns with DC’s evidence that he did not experience any loss of performance before the sudden failure of the battery. c. A cell failure could have a range of causes incl...

8. TM v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 142 (11 April 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...problem, they began asking agents to provide customers with questions and specifically to ask them if the property is “stacked” or not. 15. SH said insurance companies do not look up house sales online to check the property and rely on the information provided them. He said that the problem became apparent when W realised it needed to ask the question to get that information. 16. Because the only evidence provided to prove TM’s claim is basically his opinion, and because SH p...

9. H Ltd v TU, DU and GU as trustees for the U Family Trust [2024] NZDT 185 (4 March 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...caused by the failure of the Trust to keep its roof clean. For this reason, it is not necessary to consider the other two issues and the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 4 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. HC v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 482 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

    ...[Shopping Mall] did not have a business lounge and was not advised of any other locations that had business lounge services. 6. The website states S Ltd provides unlimited access to a business lounge. In the hearing, S Ltd accepted its website and information including the terms and conditions did not include information about the services they could access. 7. S Ltd accepted an ordinary person would not know [Shopping Mall] did not have a business lounge and would not know they ha...