Search Results

1. TC v CC [2024] NZDT 470 (13 June 2024) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...apparent that there had been a leak for some time, which was not covered by insurance. 12. I find that the black mould discovered in 2022 was completely cleaned up before the stairwell was regibbed and re wall papered. A record of drying conditions form was provided which the repairer had completed when undertaking the drying process. There is also evidence that an anti-microbial treatment was twice applied as a make safe. 13. I reject any suggestion that the stairwell was regib...

2. Savage v Accident Compensation Corporation (Lump Sum Compensation) [2022] NZACC 227 [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...relevant decision had been revoked. There is no record of Mr Savage applying to review the 14 November 1998 decision. [6] In 2014, an application for a further lump sum payment was made under the 1982 Act. [7] On 3 February 2014, Mr Savage requested further lump sum compensation under sections 78 and 79 of the 1982 Act. This was on the basis that he had received new medical evidence that the 1988 lump sum payment was wholly inadequate. [8] The new medical evidence that Mr Sava...

3. NN v OD v Z Ltd [2024] NZDT 797 (27 November 2024) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...Ltd The Tribunal orders: Z Ltd is to pay to NN and OD jointly the sum of $5,232.36 on or before 18 December 2024. Reasons: 1. In January 2024, NN and OD (“the applicants”) booked a rental car using [an online booking platform]. The car was booked with Z Ltd. 2. The applicants picked up the car on 15 January 2024 in [Location 1] from Z Ltd and completed the rental agreement. 3. On 16 January 2024, the applicants had left the car parked in the [Location...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 129 Patel v Pegasus Stations Ltd [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...dismissal. In brief, the two matters were: a) Forged signature On 8 June 2010, Mr Patel complained in a letter to Mobil management that on 8 April 2010 a co-worker (Aman) had forged his signature on a company document (a wages change advice form) without his permission. b) Health and safety issue On 1 June 2010, Mr Patel complained that on 29 May 2010 his manager (Riaz Ali) failed to give him permission to see a doctor or go home when he was feeling unwell at work. [6...

5. Lee & Anor [2011] NZWHT Auckland 9 [pdf, 81 KB]

   1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 9 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6422: DENNIS LEE AND SANDRA HOCKINGS-LEE – 15A SYLVANIA CRESCENT, LYNFIELD ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Dennis Lee and Sandra Hockings-Lee are the owners of a leaky home. They filed a claim under sect...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 48 Clear v Waikato DHB [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...(2009) 7 NZELR 1. 4 Waikato District Health Board v Clear [2010] NZCA 305. conditions. The Employment Court also found that Ms Clear‟s dismissal was unjustifiable. [5] During the three-year period between 2000 and 2003, Ms Clear made four formal written complaints to her employer about Ms Parata‟s conduct. The Court of Appeal described the first three complaints in these terms: [9] The first complaint [October 2000] focused on the stress Ms Clear said had been caused...

7. Hide v Official Assignee (Confidentiality Claim) [2019] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...appointment dated 14 April 2014 issued by the Official Assignee to Mr Dennis Parsons, Chartered Accountant, authorising him to conduct the s 165 examinations. [3.3] The relevant parts of the s 165 examination transcripts which contain personal information about Mr Hide. [4] In compliance with that direction Mr LGA Currie on 29 March 2018 swore a supplementary affidavit of documents. Mr Currie is employed by the New Zealand Insolvency and Trustee Service (a business unit of the Minis...

8. T Ltd v Q Ltd [2022] NZDT 93 (2 September 2022) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...compressor, charger and battery kit (the kit) online through Q Ltd for $1079.00. 2. Q Ltd responded to the online order that the product was not available instore and would therefore have to be ordered from the supplier. 3. On 22 July Q Ltd informed T Ltd that the kit was no longer available and refunded T Ltd his payment. 4. T Ltd is claiming $2,000.00 for the cost of purchasing the kit as to acquire the kit the individual components of the kit now have to be purchased separa...

9. SK v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 196 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...Ltd has demonstrated they had the authority of the lessee of the land to tow vehicles from its site, his claim for a refund and associated costs does not succeed. Referee Perfect Date: 12 May 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

10. D Ltd v R Ltd [2024] NZDT 228 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...no evidence. NY for R Ltd said they had requested [authorities]’s representative to attend the second hearing as a witness, but [authorities] declined to appear. Nevertheless, given the issues raised by R Ltd there would have been other written forms of evidence, such as independent testing, to support its claims, yet nothing was presented by R Ltd. D Ltd say that their work was done properly and the neighbour was causing problems for the site. 5. In the absence of any evidence...