11226 items matching your search terms
rr 8(2), 17(1)(a) Form 2 Under the Employment Relations Act 2000 In the Employment Court No: / (Auckland, Wellington or Christchurch* Registry (the reference number allocated by *Corresponds to the ERA registry) the registry, i.e. EMPC/) [Specify the nature of the claim, eg, Compliance order] Between ………………………………………. [full name] of ……………………….. ………………………………………. [address] ………...
...exceptional circumstances, Legal Aid Services may consider paying disbursements not listed in the policy, or amounts exceeding the indicated maximum. In these instances, the provider will need to submit an application for amendment to grant. Further information on exceptions can be found under ‘Amendments to Grant’ at the following link: www.justice.govt.nz/about/lawyers-and-service- providers/legal-aid-lawyers/legal-aid-provider- manuals/grants-handbook/ Disbursements included i...
...TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 75 APPLICANT DU APPLICANT TU RESPONDENT OE The Tribunal orders: 1. OE is to pay TU and DU $200 by 18 February 2024. 2. The balance of the claim is struck out. Reasons: 1. TU and DU are the former parents-in-law of OE who was married to their son CU and with whom OE has a child. CU has a child (XX) from an earlier relationship with AA. At the time OE and CU were married and living together, XX was 11- 12 years old and had regular vis...
...claim is the biggest claim to date presented before the Tribunal as it involves a substantial amount of the South Island. In his address, Mr Temm gave a summary of Ngai Tahu's grievances to which counsel for the Crown, Shonagh Kenderdine, has requested the Tribunal for more time to respond. The Tribunal sees these fmal sittings as being vital to the formulation of its report of fmdings to the Minister, and has granted the Crown this extension - although it has caused timetablin...
...requires the Tribunal to cancel a contract that exceeds the monetary jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The claim must therefore be struck out. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Friday, 4 August 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
...floor Seabridge House 110 Featherston Street Wellington I PO Box 5022 Lambton Quay Wellington Tel: (04) 4993666 Fax: (04) 499 3676 Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Newsletter ISSN 0114-717X Number II August 1991 NEW CLAIMS REGISTERED WAl203 Claimants: Tuirenga Mokomoko for the Mokomoko family of the Whakatohea tribe Concerning: Statutory pardon for Mokomok9 .convicted and executed for alleged involvement in murdering mission ary Volkner Date of regist...
Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Tekau rna waru Pipiri 1994 Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Newsletter ISSN 0114-717X Number 28 June 1994 CLAIMS IN HEARING Chathams W AI 64 The Moriori inquiry was opened in the Chatham Islands 9-13 May, and continued the following week, 16-20 May, in Wellington. The claim concerns the failure of the Crown to recognise and protect Moriori customary rights to land and fisheries on Chatham and outlying islands...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 66 APPLICANT HN RESPONDENT XE The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. HN was an elected member of the [the Board] between 2019 and 2024. 2. As part of that role, emails were sent to his private email account. However, HN became concerned about emails that appeared to be forwarded from a XE email address to his priva...
...also pointed out, correctly, that Ms Shaw was represented by two counsel at the hearing and was not legally aided. [14] While Mr Mitchell did not depart from his primary submission that no costs should be awarded, he made submissions about the requests for uplifts. Two pertinent points were made about the costs claimed for attendances in the Authority. The first was that it is a low-level forum which should be reflected by a modest costs award if one is to be made. The second p...
...selling, donating or gifting the voucher to someone else (having previously offered to assist with confirming a booking). 3. Neither respondent attended the hearing, and I note that the address provided for them with the claim is the address of the former restaurant so it is possible that they have not been served notice of the claim. The restaurant appears to have been operated by the limited liability company, E Ltd, which is registered at the same address, has FW as its sole direct...