Search Results

1. DPL v AIL [2020] CEIT-2020-0028 [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...The first case management conference for this claim is set down for Thursday 29 October 2020 at 10am. This is the second allocated date as the first date was abandoned due to illness. [2] Counsel for the parties have filed a joint memorandum requesting that the Tribunal make directions that: (a) The first case management conference scheduled for 29 October 2020 at 10am be vacated; (b) The parties engage in Tribunal expert facilitation at the first available date, to be conven...

2. BW v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 208 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...a Registered Building Surveyor carry out the inspection service. BW has claimed a refund of the $1,031.55 she paid for the Report. She believes she was misled about the service to be provided. 3. S Ltd does not dispute that BW initially requested a scope of work and costings however S Ltd claims that BW was told about the work S Ltd could do and the merits of that work before any invasive investigation. S Ltd claims that as a result of the 30 minute conversation between T a...

3. ZI v DM [2023] NZDT 641 (14 November 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...which apply in these circumstances. 10. As the Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to hear the applicant’s claim, it must be struck out. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 14 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. Te Manutukutuku Issue 30 [pdf, 8.9 MB]

   ...The overview paper, by Brian Bargh, is the first in a series prepared for the Tribu­ nal which examine the way in which land and other resources were alienated from original Maori ownership, throughout the country. Copies of the paper, which forms part of the Rangahaua Whanui research project, will be sent to claimant groups in the region by the end of the year. Maori living in the Volcanic Plateau could today have a controlling interest in major farming, forestry, tourism and hy...

5. DT v BJ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1353 (21 January 2019) [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...as she has not established a prima facie case that her car was stolen and the onus is on her to prove that a valid claim exists. 6. The policy sets out the conditions of making a claim. These include conditions that DT was required to: ‘inform us of the event and give the full details and circumstances of what has happened, including details of everyone involved’. “provide proof of ownership, information and other evidence that we may require”. “provide all reasonabl...

6. Apostolakis v Gilbert (Late Interlocutory Applications) [2017] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...However, when she could not support her claim or provide any evidence to support it, she refused to comply with Mr Gilbert’s request that she withdraw the claim. Mr Gilbert thereupon ceased acting for her. [4] In August 2011 Mrs Apostolakis requested and was given Mr Gilbert’s file. [5] In these proceedings Mrs Apostolakis alleges Mr Gilbert failed to comply fully with her request for his file and further complains that he failed to comply with a request that information on the...

7. GB v R Ltd [2021] NZDT 1653 (4 November 2021) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...or indirectly as a result of the injury, and so the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. 11. For these reasons the claim is struck out. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 4 November 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

8. UN v BF Ltd [2022] NZDT 138 (6 September 2022) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...there despite knowing that it required a permit to be in, and that he did not have one. While UN says that he looked for a machine from which to purchase a permit and couldn’t find one, it would have been reasonable for him to search for further information. If he had done this I find that it is more likely than not that he would have found the sign near the entry to the car park which is large, headed up ‘Authorised Paid Parking Only’ and would have been difficult to miss for a pers...

9. EMPC Form 1AA - Challenge the dismissal of frivolous or vexatious proceedings [doc, 55 KB]

   r 6A Form 1AA Statement of claim: challenge in respect of dismissal of frivolous or vexatious proceedings Section 178A, Employment Relations Act 2000 In the Employment Court No: / (Auckland, Wellington or Christchurch* Registry (the reference number allocated by *Corresponds to the ERA registry) the registry, i.e. EMPC/) Election to have matter heard in the Employment Court Between ………………………………………. [full name] of ………………...

10. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 262 KB]

    ...Human Rights Review Tribunal Complainant Glenn, Fran, Eamon Marshall (Our Ref: C/28032) Respondent IDEA Services Limited (“IDEA Services”) Matters investigated Whether IDEA Services responded appropriately to the Marshall's 15 May 2016 request for personal information (concerning his family and son). Whether IDEA Services took reasonable steps to check information was accurate, complete, relevant, up to date and not misleading before producing a report for the Ministry of...