Search Results

1. Beattie v Official Assignee (Costs) [2021] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...[15] to [30]) left Mr Beattie aggrieved not only in relation to satisfaction of the demands but also in respect of the costs of administering his bankrupt estate. Mr Beattie submits he therefore had good reason to make the two information access requests. Not only did he have a right to the requested information, once it had been provided to him he intended requesting corrections pursuant to IPP 7. [10.2] Mr Beattie believes he had good reason to refuse to deal with the Assignee’s l...

2. [2007] NZEmpC WC 10/07 Nola & Anor v Harvey [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...challenge to the Employment Court rather than to the District Court. They were told they had 28 days from the date of the determination to do this, the amount of the fees required, and that they should contact the Employment Court for the necessary forms. [9] At 8am on Friday, 7 November 2006, a statement of claim and the required fee were received by mail by the Employment Court. The claim was dated 3 November 2006 and an accompanying letter was dated 2 November 2006. This let...

3. O'Neill v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal) [2023] NZACC 001 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...case, the correspondence revealed that the Corporation had made no decisions which attracted review rights under section 134 of the Act. The Corporation’s correspondence with Mr O’Neill was advisory in nature. At no time had the Corporation formed a view on, or made a decision about, the merits of any claim Mr O’Neill may have made. Judge McGuire further noted: (a) The 23 August 2019 letter advised Mr O’Neill that the Corporation had previously advised him what he neede...

4. P Ltd v W Ltd [2024] NZDT 16 (17 January 2024) [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...settling in light winds or still air, as was the case here, would not have caused damage. 22. P Ltd’s claim is not proven and must be dismissed. Referee: C D Boys Date: 17 January 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

5. BW v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 208 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...a Registered Building Surveyor carry out the inspection service. BW has claimed a refund of the $1,031.55 she paid for the Report. She believes she was misled about the service to be provided. 3. S Ltd does not dispute that BW initially requested a scope of work and costings however S Ltd claims that BW was told about the work S Ltd could do and the merits of that work before any invasive investigation. S Ltd claims that as a result of the 30 minute conversation between T a...

6. DPL v AIL [2020] CEIT-2020-0028 [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...The first case management conference for this claim is set down for Thursday 29 October 2020 at 10am. This is the second allocated date as the first date was abandoned due to illness. [2] Counsel for the parties have filed a joint memorandum requesting that the Tribunal make directions that: (a) The first case management conference scheduled for 29 October 2020 at 10am be vacated; (b) The parties engage in Tribunal expert facilitation at the first available date, to be conven...

7. Te Manutukutuku Issue 30 [pdf, 8.9 MB]

   ...The overview paper, by Brian Bargh, is the first in a series prepared for the Tribu­ nal which examine the way in which land and other resources were alienated from original Maori ownership, throughout the country. Copies of the paper, which forms part of the Rangahaua Whanui research project, will be sent to claimant groups in the region by the end of the year. Maori living in the Volcanic Plateau could today have a controlling interest in major farming, forestry, tourism and hy...

8. DT v BJ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1353 (21 January 2019) [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...as she has not established a prima facie case that her car was stolen and the onus is on her to prove that a valid claim exists. 6. The policy sets out the conditions of making a claim. These include conditions that DT was required to: ‘inform us of the event and give the full details and circumstances of what has happened, including details of everyone involved’. “provide proof of ownership, information and other evidence that we may require”. “provide all reasonabl...

9. ZI v DM [2023] NZDT 641 (14 November 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...which apply in these circumstances. 10. As the Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to hear the applicant’s claim, it must be struck out. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 14 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

10. Apostolakis v Gilbert (Late Interlocutory Applications) [2017] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 238 KB]

    ...However, when she could not support her claim or provide any evidence to support it, she refused to comply with Mr Gilbert’s request that she withdraw the claim. Mr Gilbert thereupon ceased acting for her. [4] In August 2011 Mrs Apostolakis requested and was given Mr Gilbert’s file. [5] In these proceedings Mrs Apostolakis alleges Mr Gilbert failed to comply fully with her request for his file and further complains that he failed to comply with a request that information on the...