Search Results

1. LM v RB LCRO 332/2012 (15 June 2016) [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...as for the Standards Committee. 15 [47] I have therefore given consideration as to whether or not this decision should be published. [48] It is the practice of this Office to seek submissions on publication from the parties if the LCRO forms a preliminary view that publication may be in the public interest. Again, and at this stage, it is a matter of discretion. [49] One of the expressed purposes of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act is “to protect the consumers of legal se...

2. Alloa v Ullapool LCRO 159/09 (22 June 2010) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...to her, he would be required to give evidence, and could be summonsed for that purpose. [5] The second letter [letter B] became the subject of the Applicant’s complaint to the New Zealand Law Society. In this letter the Practitioner informed the Applicant that he could face potential liability as a party for the losses claimed by R. The Practitioner enclosed a draft amended statement of claim showing the Applicant and his company named as defendants and suggested he may wa...

3. Hamilton v Trustees of Erepeti Marae - Tuahu 3X (2009) 128 Wairoa MB 77 (128 WR 77) [pdf, 931 KB]

   ...(AB & AW Reed, Wellington, 1972 ed) Genealogical Table xiv 'Smith - Tuahu 3X (2006) 113 Wairoa MB 224 (113 WR 224) 128 Wairoa MS 81 [11] The matter was set down for hearing for the first time on 27 March 2007. However, Mr Hamilton requested for health reasons that the hearing be deferred until June 2007. It was duly adjourned until 21 June. On that date, Mr Hamilton was represented by Mr Barney Tupara. However, the trustees did not have counsel and the nature of the all...

4. MI & ZM v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 435 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...reasonable care and skill? • What remedy is available to the applicants? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 Did B Ltd manage its credit/refund and booking processes with reasonable care and skill? 6. As the contract was formed in [Country], and because the Montreal Convention does not cover this aspect of an airline’s dealings with its customers, the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (‘CGA’) applies. 7. ZM also referenced the Fair Trading Act, but as the...

5. Johnston Property Holdings Limited [2014] NZWHT Auckland 5 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...for reconsideration requires the claimant to provide sufficient details to support the application. In this section Ms Johnston stated that the company would provide evidence to confirm that the property was built after August 2003. Ms Johnston requested an extension of time to provide this evidence. [4] On 5 March 2014 the Tribunal Chair, Ms McConnell, wrote to JPL at the address provided and sent a copy of this letter to Mr Johnston by email to the email address provided. M...

6. Form 16 Waitangi Tribunal Invoice [pdf, 225 KB]

   Legal Aid Services use only Approve Further information Refuse Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 16 Tax Invoice Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings Legal Aid File No. Invoice Reference No. GST Number Invoice Date To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer WAI Number Inquiry Lead provider Law firm Details of Claim Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Stage of...

7. Form-20a_Civil_non-Fixed.pdf [pdf, 186 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 Use this form to claim for any Civil matter other than Family, Waitangi and fixed fee proceedings. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Details of claim Forum category 1 2 3 4 Type of proceedings this invoice covers: Covers period from: to Interim invoice Final invoice Lead Provider Listed Provider B Provider name or numbe...

8. Samuels v Matauri X Incorporation - Matauri X Incorporation (2007) 120 Whangarei MB 52 (120 WH 52) [pdf, 9.4 MB]

   ...September 2006. However, on 25 August 2006 Ms Afa sought an adjournment of the hearing as a shareholders meeting was scheduled for 14 October 2006. A new hearing date of 19 December 2006 was then allocated, however, that was later also vacated at the request of Ms Afa as it did not suit Mr Samuels. A further hearing date of 14 FebLUary 2007 was later also vacated at the request of Mr Davis, who by the begirming of this year had taken over acting for Mr Samuels. [7] On 6 March 20...

9. Pue v Tapatu - Okawa A1B (2011) 268 Aotea MB 93 (268 AOT 93) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...trustee of the Koro Pue Whānau Trust. The trustees are the majority owners of Okawa A1B. They seek an injunction against the Respondents on the basis of an alleged actual trespass by way of encroachment over the land. In particular, the Applicant claims that the Respondents have illegally erected, permitted to be erected and maintained on the land structures and trees including fences, a lean-to, out-houses and a water and septic system. All of which the trustees say prevent them...

10. EFT v SQ [2019] NZDT 1357 (25 October 2019) [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...are EFT 's reasonable losses? Was Mr Q negligent in allowing his stock to make their way onto the highway? 4. I find that EFT have provided insufficient evidence to prove negligence on Mr Q's part. Section 5(2) of the Animal Law Reform Act 1989 states that, in determining whether or not a person is liable by way of negligence for damage caused by an animal straying onto a particular highway, consideration shall be given to the common practice in the relevant locality in r...