Search Results

1. Chief Executive, Ministry for Culture and Heritage - Tāonga Tūturu found at Plimmerton (2012) 283 Aotea MB 166 (283 AOT 166) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...determination of ownership of a täonga, a pounamu heitiki, found by Noel Comerford at Plimmerton Beach, north of Porirua, Wellington. It is currently held at Te Papa Tongarewa. Following a process of notification Te Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira Inc now claims that it is the appropriate body in which to vest ownership of the heitiki. [2] Mr Comerford objects to this claim. He says that ownership for his lifetime is the only acceptable outcome. He also says that he does not want the t...

2. T Ltd v Q Ltd [2022] NZDT 93 (2 September 2022) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...compressor, charger and battery kit (the kit) online through Q Ltd for $1079.00. 2. Q Ltd responded to the online order that the product was not available instore and would therefore have to be ordered from the supplier. 3. On 22 July Q Ltd informed T Ltd that the kit was no longer available and refunded T Ltd his payment. 4. T Ltd is claiming $2,000.00 for the cost of purchasing the kit as to acquire the kit the individual components of the kit now have to be purchased separa...

3. SK v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 196 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...Ltd has demonstrated they had the authority of the lessee of the land to tow vehicles from its site, his claim for a refund and associated costs does not succeed. Referee Perfect Date: 12 May 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. D Ltd v R Ltd [2024] NZDT 228 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...no evidence. NY for R Ltd said they had requested [authorities]’s representative to attend the second hearing as a witness, but [authorities] declined to appear. Nevertheless, given the issues raised by R Ltd there would have been other written forms of evidence, such as independent testing, to support its claims, yet nothing was presented by R Ltd. D Ltd say that their work was done properly and the neighbour was causing problems for the site. 5. In the absence of any evidence...

5. EU v UX [2023] NZDT 313 (23 June 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...a total of $14,950.00 to have the work completed by another supplier, whereas the unpaid balance of the contract price was only $8,387.00. The amount required to put the consumer into the position he would have been in if the contract had been performed is therefore $6,563.00. This exceeds the amount claimed, and no more than the $4,990.00 notified to the supplier can be awarded without adjourning to give further notice. For these reasons, I find that the supplier must pay $4,990.00 to the...

6. Clearwater Cove Apartments Body Corporate 170989 v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 39 [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...GARAGES PART OF THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS? [27] The Clearwater Cove residential apartments each have a garage as an ancillary unit. There are four garages attached to the main building where the residential units are located and another 12 garages form a separate and distinct L-shaped structure. The Council submits that none of the garages fell within the jurisdiction of the Act8. For the reasons that follow we found that the claimant has only proved the existence of weathertigh...

7. Head Heights Ltd [2011] NZWHT Auckland 6 [pdf, 87 KB]

   1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 6 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6374: HEAD HEIGHTS LIMITED – 46 LAGOON WAY, WEST HARBOUR ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Head Heights Limited is the owner of a house at 46 Lagoon Way, West Harbour. While not disputing that the house...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 88 Panapa v Spotless Facility Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...forgotten. [10] By letter dated 7 June 2018, Ms Panapa provided information to her E tū union delegate, Mr Palmer, setting out her concerns to enable him to assist her. Mr Palmer acknowledged receiving the letter but says that, at Ms Panapa’s request, he did not give the letter to Spotless. Mr Palmer understood that Ms Panapa was concerned that she had referred to other people in her letter and did not want that information to be passed on to Spotless. [11] Mr Palmer confi...

9. FB Ltd v HE & QE [2023] NZDT 676 (6 December 2023) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...payment of the outstanding account. 66. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that the counterclaim must be dismissed. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 6 December 2023 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 7 of 7 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.8 June 2018 [pdf, 1 MB]

    ...Operational Policy for providing early legal advice for disputes under the Care of Children Act 2004 Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.8 July 2018 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and ful...