Search Results

1. DC v NL [2024] NZDT 263 (25 January 2024) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...8. In conclusion, I find that NL did not breach the CGA and therefore DC is not entitled to any compensation, therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 25 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

2. KQ v LI [2023] NZDT 593 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...hearing LI’s phone number was [redacted]. The Referee noted that LI initially answered then hung up, then did not answer 2 further calls. Then later that day he called the court and provided his wife’s number to be used, not the number in the claim form. Referee: J Savage Date: 6 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made...

3. KQ v UN [2024] NZDT 52 (19 January 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...damage to [car 2]. This is sufficient proof of liability in a civil claim. UN is therefore liable for the total repair costs for both cars of $10,237.93. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 19 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. NC v HU [2023] NZDT 692 (21 December 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...law of contract apply to this dispute. A contract is an agreement that the parties intend to be legally bound by. It involves an exchange of promises and becomes binding when the parties agree on clear and certain terms. The terms of a contract are formed at the beginning, not at the end. A contract can be in writing, oral or a mixture of both. Variations to agreements can be made in the same manner. Subsequent actions, of the parties, can show that parties confirm their intention to be bo...

5. TT v D Ltd & TC [2024] NZDT 488 (25 June 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...SECOND RESPONDENT TC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In September 2023, TT purchased a tenanted two-bedroom apartment with a carpark in [suburb] from TC for $29,000.00 at an auction held by D Ltd. TT was informed by the tenants during the pre-settlement inspection that there was a leak in the sink and shower. Settlement went ahead, but TT subsequently resold the apartment to her property manager, who had originally managed the property for TC...

6. 2021 archive

   ...addition to travel exceptions list Temporary issues with 0800 2 LEGAL AID Update on the outcome of the Police Detention Legal Assistance (PDLA) trial roster survey Criminal Cases Review Commission – update to granting process Legal Aid application forms updated due to the Privacy Act 2020 Legal Services - Waikato Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court New addition to travel exceptions list Update on Legal Aid Services response to COVID-19 (12 March 2021) Update on Legal Aid Services response...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Legal aid lawyers >
   4. Whats New for lawyers providing Legal Aid

7. [2018] NZSSAA 12 (28 February 2018) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...states that the Ministry relies on a letter to the Authority from the Appeals Officer dated 12 October 2017 to support its submissions. [14] The Appeals Officer contends that asking an applicant for a benefit to attend a local office amounts to performance of an ancillary function under the State Sector Act 1988, not a decision. The officer cites s 32 of the State Sector Act which requires the Chief Executive to discharge his responsibilities for the efficient, effective, and eco...

8. Brokenshaw - Te Kaha B6X2 (2003) 81 Ōpōtiki MB 18 (81 OPO 18) [pdf, 891 KB]

   ...family to reclaim possession of the land and the house. She also expressed concerns about the chattels in the house. This application was filed with the application under section 20/1993. In support of the application Ms Brokenshaw filed an affidavit requesting that the Court consider the following. First of all that she had filed an application under section 18(1 )(a)/1993 determining ownership of the house and garage on Te Kaha B6X2. Secondly, that the block was owned jointly by herse...

9. Jones v Sircombe [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...contractor”, and at no time sought the advice of the retailer as to the preferred roofing material that might be used. It was the builders who recommended the product. The shop did not stock Onduline and never had, and it was at the specific request of the claimant that the product was ordered in. It was then received and dispatched to the building site. 36. Ms Byers submitted that at all times the fourth respondent acted in good faith, promptly referring the complaint to th...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 146 Rimene v Doherty and Natusch Group Limited [pdf, 63 KB]

    ...“There is a lot of money at stake that has become an issue between them both." 3 In brief, Mr Doherty was engaged in the purchase and renovation of properties in New Zealand for rental and Mr Rimene began working for him. Later Mr Doherty formed Natusch Group Limited. One of the issues in the case was whether the Natusch Group Limited ever became Mr Rimene's employer. There were a number of other issues. Suffice it to say that the Authority concluded that Mr Rimene...