Search Results

1. DE v SC [2023] NZDT 499 (10 October 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...for the accident, and for the damage to both DE’s vehicle and to SC’s vehicle is the driver of [car 2]. 16. The claim against SC is dismissed. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 10 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. XS v UQ [2024] NZDT 132 (19 March 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...7. The amount claimed is the final price for the work less an adjustment for depreciation of the wall. 8. The claim is proved. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Tuesday, 19 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. MM v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 503 (8 August 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...take into account that this was a second-hand vehicle. My view might be different if it was new. 9) In these circumstances the claim must be dismissed. Referee: GP Rossiter Date: 8 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. Practice directions

   PRACTICE NOTE: As Directed by the Adjudicator under clause 1 of Schedule 1 of the Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 On this page: Information that needs to be included with your application Adjournments Remote viewing of hearings Practice direction: Information that needs to be included with your application This practice direction sets out the policy and procedures of the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal (MVDT) about the information that needs to be included with your application. You must provide

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal

5. L v EQC [2022] CEIT-2019-0038 / 0044 [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...entirety. [13] The Declination Letters advised Ms L that should she not agree with the decision, that she could supply further information in support of her claims, and that EQC would reconsider its decision on receipt of such information. EQC requested that the amounts already paid out to Ms L for the emergency work claimed, be repaid to it. [14] The matter came to a head again two years later in 2015. In a letter to EQC dated 10 June 2015 Ms L offered to repay the amounts sough...

6. QC Ltd (in liquidation) v WD Ltd [2020] NZDT 1326 (4 August 2020) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...QCL the sum of $800.00. As this sum if GST inclusive, QCL is requested to issue a fresh or amended invoice for GST purposes. Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 4 August 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

7. BORA Ngāruahine Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...consistent with articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act. [3] Whether s 27(3) at issue 8. Clause 24(3) of the Bill excludes damages and other forms of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure by the Crown to comply with a protocol under the Bill. 9. This clause may be seen to raise the issue of compliance with s 27(3) of the Bill of Rights Act, namely the right to bring c...

8. BORA Hineuru Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act. [3] Whether s 27(3) at issue 8. Clauses 26(3) and 30 of the Bill respectively exclude damages or other forms of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure by the Crown to comply with Te Kawenata without good cause or a protocol under the Bill. 9. These clauses may be seen to raise the issue of compliance with s 27(3) of the Bill of...

9. BORA Ngāti Whātua o Kaipara Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...exclusion was consistent with arts 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act.[5] Exclusion of remedy of compensation 8. Clause 29(3) excludes any form of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure of the Crown to comply with a Culture and Heritage protocol issued under Part 2 of the Bill. It might be argued that this clause limits the right to bring civil proceedings against th...

10. BORA Te Atiawa Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 278 KB]

    ...consistent with articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act. [3] Whether s 27(3) at issue 8. Clause 23(3) of the Bill excludes damages and other forms of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure by the Crown to comply with a protocol under the Bill. 9. This clause may be seen to raise the issue of compliance with s 27(3) of the Bill of Rights Act, namely the right to bring c...