IJ v K U Ltd [2020] NZDT 1549 (10 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]
...inspection is strong evidence the system was not legally compliant. Further, IJ was required to install an RPZ valve. K & U Ltd contracted with IJ to provide a legally compliant working system and it was not. Furthermore, K & U Ltd employees informed IJ on many occasions that the RPZ valve requirement was just an error in the paperwork and it was not. For these reasons I find K & U Ltd has not completed the work they contracted to complete with reasonable skill and care. I also...