Search Results

1. EN v IX Ltd [2022] NZDT 223 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...of the doors. EN’s claim is therefore dismissed and IX Ltd are entitled to the balance due for the manufacture and supply of the doors and windows. Referee: R Merrett Date: 30 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. NW & NG v TM Ltd [2023] NZDT 579 (16 November 2023) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...[2023] NZDT 579 APPLICANT NW and NG RESPONDENT TM Ltd The Tribunal orders: TM Ltd is to pay $7500.00 to NW and NG on or before 14 December 2023. Reasons 1. NW and NG contracted TM Ltd to provide concreting services in the form of a new concrete driveway covering 123sqm. A price of $21,975.00 was agreed and this included replacement of a section of the shared driveway. The contract price was paid in full by completion of the job. 2. The job took 20 days rathe...

3. HL Ltd v AH [2023] NZDT 490 (17 October 2023) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...occurred on the facts of this case. As HL Ltd has not shown that the damage was caused by AH’s act of negligence, its claim is dismissed. Referee: Ms Cowie DTR Date: 17 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

4. DE v SC [2023] NZDT 499 (10 October 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...for the accident, and for the damage to both DE’s vehicle and to SC’s vehicle is the driver of [car 2]. 16. The claim against SC is dismissed. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 10 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

5. XS v UQ [2024] NZDT 132 (19 March 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...7. The amount claimed is the final price for the work less an adjustment for depreciation of the wall. 8. The claim is proved. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Tuesday, 19 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

6. MM v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 503 (8 August 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...take into account that this was a second-hand vehicle. My view might be different if it was new. 9) In these circumstances the claim must be dismissed. Referee: GP Rossiter Date: 8 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. Practice directions

   PRACTICE NOTE: As Directed by the Adjudicator under clause 1 of Schedule 1 of the Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 On this page: Information that needs to be included with your application Adjournments Remote viewing of hearings Practice direction: Information that needs to be included with your application This practice direction sets out the policy and procedures of the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal (MVDT) about the information that needs to be included with your application. You must provide

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal

8. Langhorne v ACC [2010] NZACA 11 [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...treated the review application lodged under Part 9 of the 1992 Act, as coming under Part 5 of the 2001 Act. [9] This process was upheld and promoted by the Reviewer, and acquiesced to by the Case Manager, despite counsel’s repeated objections and requests to conduct the review under the correct legislation. [10] Through correspondence with Legal Services and the Wellington City branch office, ACC was put on formal notice on 28 February 2008, 4 March 2008, 4 April 2008, 18 Apr...

9. Langhorne v Accident Compensation Corporation [2010] NZACA 11 [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...treated the review application lodged under Part 9 of the 1992 Act, as coming under Part 5 of the 2001 Act. [9] This process was upheld and promoted by the Reviewer, and acquiesced to by the Case Manager, despite counsel’s repeated objections and requests to conduct the review under the correct legislation. [10] Through correspondence with Legal Services and the Wellington City branch office, ACC was put on formal notice on 28 February 2008, 4 March 2008, 4 April 2008, 18 Apr...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 22 Bachu v Davie Motors Ltd [pdf, 86 KB]

    ...Bachu set out his allegations in writing. Earlier, having received some telephone indication from Mr Bachu as to his allegations, the chief executive officer had commenced an enquiry within the company of those alleged to have been involved. He formed the view that the allegations of Mr Bachu were unfounded. [4] Matters appeared to rest there. Mr Bachu in his written documents had indicated that he would not be returning to work and as the second of the two written documents...