CAC 10031 v Lum-On [2012] NZREADT 30 [pdf, 144 KB]
...agreement in respect of the property. (b) The defendant did not disclose his conflict of interest to the complainants. [6] At that time of these events Mr Lum-On held a salespersons licence and worked for Ray White Manukau. [7] These charges form the basis for the issues to be determined. (a) Was Mr Lum-On acting as an agent when he advised on the “lay-by” agreement? (b) Did he receive $1,500 from the Nathans as a deposit or a fee for service? If the latter, does that contra...