Search Results

1. [2015] NZSSAA 001 (13 February) [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...debt was returned to the Authority for reconsideration apparently on the basis that the Authority did not have before it information about the appellant’s circumstances and financial situation. This was despite the Authority having specifically requested the appellant to provide this information. [5] The appellant has now had a further opportunity to provide submissions to the Authority on the issue of whether or not the debt should be recovered. [6] The debt relating to Accommo...

2. R v D LCRO 56 / 2009 (19 June 2009) - Rehearing Decision [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...Lawyer D had understood that the focus of a review would be on the grounds forwarded by the applicant, and that he was unaware that the LCRO’s review would focus on the Standards Committee decision. To that end Mr XX argued that the Guidelines request that a review applicant set out the grounds for the application and identify any errors made by the Committee. What appears to be implicit in this submission is that Lawyer D was misled into believing that the review would focus on...

3. Director of Proceedings v Nelson Marlborough District Health Board [2014] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...annexed and marked “A”. [3] The Consent Memorandum is in the following terms: MAY IT PLEASE THE TRIBUNAL 1. The plaintiff and defendant have agreed upon a summary of facts, a signed copy of which is filed with this memorandum. 2. The plaintiff requests that the Tribunal exercise its jurisdiction in respect of the following matters: (a) A declaration pursuant to s 54(1)(a) of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 (“the Act”) that the defendant has breached the Heal...

4. [2016] NZSSAA 021 (31 March 2016) [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...records indicate that the appellant had at least 32 interactions with the Ministry between 2 September 2011 and 13 June 2013 when the data match occurred. These contacts included both face-to-face appointments and telephone contact. Many of the requests for assistance related to applications for Special Needs Grants. In a contact on 30 October 2012 the appellant applied for a Special Needs Grant for food and advised that he was starting temporary part-time work and had bought safety boo...

5. Kumar v Ahuja [2014] NZIACDT 120 (19 December 2014) [pdf, 123 KB]

   ...consultation with Mr Ahuja. One of Global’s personnel told Mr Kumar an offer of employment was available, so he should pay further fees for his immigration to progress. Mr Ahuja was not aware of these developments at the time. Mr Kumar paid the fees requested. [3] There was no employment offer, which would have been necessary for the immigration work to proceed. Mr Kumar wanted repayment of the instalment of fees he paid after he believed there was a job offer. Mr Ahuja refunded the am...

6. AR v ZG LCRO 60 / 2010 (15 March 2011) [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...[12] An essential point raised by the Applicant is that the consent of all three Trustees was required for any decisions made by the Trust. In this light he objected to the Practitioner having undertaken work for the Trust that had been done at the request of his wife, about which he claimed to have no knowledge. This appeared to be the basis of his objection that he, the Applicant, ended up paying for a bill in relation to work in respect of which he was unaware. [13] In reply...

7. [2017] NZEmpC 31 Ratu v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...to her position by way of an Oral Consent Determination of the Employment Relations Authority at an Investigation Meeting on 23 May 2016, confirming in writing on 24 May 2015 (attachment 1). 5. By letter dated 29 June 2016, the Applicant was requested by the Respondent to attend a disciplinary meeting to take place on Tuesday 5 July 2016 at 11am (attachment 2). The purpose of the meeting was to discuss allegations of serious misconduct. 6. The allegations of serious misconduct...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 1 FGH v RST [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...next step would await the Court’s further consideration of the plaintiff’s application for an interim order. [9] Although a hearing for the application for a non-publication order was initially set down for 4 October 2017, because the parties requested the convening of a Judicial Settlement Conference (JSC), I discussed with counsel the possibility of deferring the hearing until after that event. This was agreed. [10] The JSC took place on 18 December 2017; it did not result in...

9. [2019] NZEmpC 155 George Weston Foods (NZ) Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...email dated Wednesday 24 July 2019 at 1.33 pm. The recipients and senders of that email are not solicitors, but George Weston claims privilege, as it says the email was sent internally for the purpose of instructing Kensington Swan, and includes information regarding those instructions. (b) A document headed up “Wiri Pie and Sausage Roll CEA Negotiations 2019”. This document appears largely to be a report back on the recent negotiations. Much of it has been disclosed, but...

10. Waitangi Tribunal - Part III Te Urewera [pdf, 6.7 MB]

    ...rectified, and footnotes checked and corrected where necessary . Photographs and additional illustrative material may be inserted, and some maps may be modified, added, or replaced . The Tribunal is releasing a pre-publication version of its report at the request of the Crown and claimants in Te Urewera in order to assist them in their negotiations . The remainder of the pre-publication report will be released in further parts . Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded fr...