Search Results

1. QH v KH [2020] NZDT 1467 (2 December 2020) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...currently work and it is not known exactly when it stopped working. It is shown working in the marketing photos for the property. In the emails presented, the pool light is noted to be functioning on 12 June, 4 days before settlement. By 3 July QH had informed the real estate agents that it was not working. There is no further evidence as to when it failed. For these reasons I find that it is not proven on the balance of probabilities that the light failed prior to settlement. Therefore,...

2. NT v BP Ltd [2022] NZDT 5 (17 January 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...“unit” is defined as the whole pallet (s247(1)(c)(i)). 10. The liability of the respondent is therefore limited in this case to $2,000.00. Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 17 January 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. KN v BT [2020] NZDT 1365 (9 December 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...further agreement regarding the driveway fence but no agreement was ever reached. Is BT liable to contribute to the cost of the driveway fence as claimed by KN? 9. Once no agreement was reached regarding the driveway fence, KN needed to issue a formal fencing notice to BT. This is required by section 10 of the Fencing Act 1978, and the Act details what is required to be specified in such a notice. 10. KN’s email to BT of 31 July 2020 contained 4 quotations as attachments an...

4. FD v TN & N Ltd [2024] NZDT 30 (25 January 2024) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...probabilities. 10. As a result of the above finding, TN was not negligent and is not liable for the losses suffered by FD/J Ltd as a result of the collision. Referee Perfect Date: 25 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. CD Ltd v CO Ltd [2022] NZDT 279 (10 November 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...interest on the claimed amount in accordance with the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016. Interest totals $171.41, so the total amount payable by CO Ltd is $9152.91. Referee Perfect Date: 10 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

6. OS v E Ltd [2023] NZDT 89 (23 March 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...depended upon when they arrived in OS’ letterbox. h. There is no evidence of what else E Ltd ought to have done or could have done when OS contacted them on 19 December. There is nothing to suggest that another courier company could have perform better or faster. 13. For these reasons the claim is dismissed. Referee: LK Whineray Date: 23 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you b...

7. D Ltd v P Inc [2025] NZDT 229 (16 June 2025) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...entitled to payment, as it is the entity that P Inc entered into a contract with. 8. For the above reasons the claim is dismissed. L Thompson Disputes Tribunal Referee 16 June 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. H Trustees Ltd v PT [2024] NZDT 512 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...situation PT finds himself in, on balance it would be unjust to allow rehearing at this late stage. Therefore, I dismiss PT’s application. Referee: Boys C DTR Date: 12 June 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 31 Zara's Turkish Ltd v Kocaturk [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...whether disclosure is to be ordered.10 In particular Privacy Principle 11(e)(iv) allows for disclosure of information where it is for proceedings before a court. However, he criticised the application as extremely broad, describing it as a blanket request for all files and communications over an extended period. [17] Are the documents sought relevant? The first three parts of the application (at [2](a)–(c) above) are about Mr Kocatürk. I begin this assessment by considering...

10. HC & KP v QT [2023] NZDT 413 (10 July 2023) [pdf, 230 KB]

    ...APPLICANT KP RESPONDENT QT The Tribunal orders: A. QT is to pay $2,610.00 to HC and KP on or before 30 July 2023, regardless of whether any work has been completed. B. The Applicant’s builder [Builder] is to perform the work as set out in the company’s quotation and scope of work dated 30 April 2023, at a time to be decided which is convenient to the company. C. The Applicants are to ensure that [Builder] gives QT 24 hours notice in writing placed...