Search Results

1. DQ v OL [2024] NZDT 304 (3 May 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...repair, and based on the evidence I find the claimed costs to be actual, reasonable and consistent with the nature of the incident. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee Perfect Date: 3 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

2. TD Ltd v W Ltd [2024] NZDT 429 (23 May 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...$20,000.00. 8. The finding that a binding settlement was reached means that no further claim is possible by TD Ltd and the second issue above does not need to be addressed. Referee Perfect Date: 23 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

3. Waitangi Tribunal theme C - Customary land tenure [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   Rangahaua Whanui Nat ional Theme c THE CROWN’S ENGAGEMENT WITH CUSTOMARY TENURE IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY HAZEL RISEBOROUGH and JOHN HUTTON July 1997 Firs t Release WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other Rangahaua Whanui reports District reports District 1: Auckland (pt i), R Daamen, P Hamer, and Dr B Rigby; (pt ii), M Belgrave District 5b: Gisborne, S Daly District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B Bargh District 8: The Alienation of Maori Land in the Rohe Potae, C Marr Dist

4. Form-26_Criminal-Fixed-H-I.pdf [pdf, 188 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 26 Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules H & I Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed...

5. [2007] NZEmpC WC 11/07 Smith v Nga Kairauhii Trust [pdf, 52 KB]

   ...that the grievance was submitted to the employer long after the expiry of the 90-day period, the Authority considered the evidence about the delay in doing so. Although the intended defendant had failed to provide the intending plaintiff with a form of written employment agreement as the statute requires (including the mandatory statutory requirement for reference to grievance resolution procedures and the 90-day time limit), it found this was not Ms Smith’s reason for failing to t...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 48 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [pdf, 370 KB]

   ...the university.4 [7] The university employed Dr Sawyer as a lecturer in the law faculty. In early March 2014, she complained about behaviour she attributed to two named senior employees in her faculty. A full and independent investigation was requested. In the meantime, she reserved all her rights, including the ability to raise a personal grievance. 4 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington, above n...

7. Fehling v Appleby (Strike-Out Application) [2013] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...Fehling was told that the reason was that complaints had been made to the Caretaker that he (Mr Fehling) had been using the pool, showers and toilets at the School. Mr Fehling strongly denies these allegations. By way of a request for personal information under the Privacy Act 1993, Mr Fehling sought the names of the individuals who had made the complaints. The School declined to provide that information, relying on s 27(1)(d) (disclosure of the information would likely endanger the sa...

8. IJ v K U Ltd [2020] NZDT 1549 (10 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...inspection is strong evidence the system was not legally compliant. Further, IJ was required to install an RPZ valve. K & U Ltd contracted with IJ to provide a legally compliant working system and it was not. Furthermore, K & U Ltd employees informed IJ on many occasions that the RPZ valve requirement was just an error in the paperwork and it was not. For these reasons I find K & U Ltd has not completed the work they contracted to complete with reasonable skill and care. I also...

9. BM v OZ Ors [2024] NZDT 109 (5 February 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...and inconvenience. 24. So I order OZ and ZB Ltd jointly and severally to pay BM the total sum of $1,999.99. Referee: G.M. Taylor Date: 5 February 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 5 of 6 Page 6 of 6 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

10. NQ v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 651 (21 August 2024) [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...reasons above, C Limited must pay NQ $12,038.30, being $7,638.30 (the E Ltd invoice) plus $4,400.00 (part of the secured rental). Page 5 of 6 Referee: Ms Gayatri Jaduram Date: 21 August 2024 Page 6 of 6 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...