Search Results

1. LCRO 48/2019 VW v EX and TY (3 May 2021) [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...them who decided to appeal. He asked for a retainer of $5,000 from each of them. He advised if they lost they may be liable to pay the BC’s costs of “around $15,000”.41 [106] Mr TY confirmed the estimate in his 4 October 2015 letter, and requested they each pay the $5,000 retainer by 16 October 2015. He enclosed the firm’s terms of engagement, noting “a number” of the group were “behind” with payment of the firm’s invoices for the High Court proceedings. 41 U...

2. Notice to Registrar response to third party claim [pdf, 187 KB]

   Form 85 Ministry of Justice Collections Unit  www.justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt 0800 233 222 Notice to registrar: response to third party claim Court reference number Agent reference number This notice relates to the court case between (Full name of judgment creditor(s))  and (Full name of judgment debtor)  To a registrar of a District Court This document notifies you that: Select one of the following: I accept (Name of third party’s)  claim to ownership of the fol...

3. Moananui v Cape Kidnappers Station Limited - Rangaika Native Reserve (2014) 31 Takitimu MB 179 (31 TKT 179) [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...status declaration in relation to Rangaika on the basis that he contends the history of the land suggests that it is Māori customary land held as a Māori reserve, and a declaration should be made in order for the land to be recognised as such. He requests that the land be managed by a newly incorporated body under the jurisdiction of the Māori Land Court. In the alternative, the applicant requests the land be declared a reserve pursuant to the Māori Reserves Act 1955. Procedur...

4. Tan v Chief Executive Ministry of Social Development (Non Party Access to Tribunal File) [2016] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...otherwise). See Tan v Chief Executive, Ministry of Social Development (Referral back to Human Rights Commission) [2015] NZHRRT 56. The application [4] On 15 January 2016 the Tribunal received from Mr KC Vijayan of the Singapore based The Straits Times a request for copies of the statement of claim and related papers filed by Mr Tan with the Tribunal. [5] The parties have now been heard on that application. Mr Tan consents to the application. The Ministry is opposed on two main grou...

5. J v Khetarpal [2016] NZIACDT 7 (22 January 2016) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...wished to proceed regardless. [20.4] Ms Khetarpal then proceeded to file the EOI she did so electronically. The electronic system prevents a non-qualifying application, so Ms Khetarpal had to file the electronic documents stating the applicant had “claimed” points for skilled employment; though she knew he did not have the points. She excuses this falsity on the basis it only says the applicant “claimed” points, not that he had the points. The electronic form also required a decl...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 151 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...employment relationship problem it was required to resolve. It stated Mr Zhang had been employed by Telco at its Wellington office for almost five and a half years until 14 April 2017 when his position was disestablished. Summary of relevant information [10] The Authority then referred to three particular topics. [11] First, it noted that Telco was one of a group of seven companies; and that, between August 2015 and early 2017, three of these were divested from the group.

7. D (D G Family Trust) v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0037 [pdf, 605 KB]

   IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0037-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN C F D, R D G AND D R S (AS TRUSTEES OF THE D G FAMILY TRUST Applicants AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Respondent AND MAX CONTRACTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND MAX EQ LIMITED Third Respondent AND ORANGE H MANAGEMENT LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP AND IN LIQUIDATION) Fourt

8. AEL Ltd v ZVL [2012] NZDT 310 (17 April 2012) [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZVL, pay the amount of $312.57 to the Applicant, AEL Ltd, on or before 27 April 2012. Facts [1] The Applicant claims $506.93 in respect of plumbing services rendered to the Respondent at its request and invoiced under invoice #60437 (including administration and interest charges at $158.06). The Respondent takes the view that its insurer should...

9. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (HDC Act) [2020] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 434 KB]

   ...excluded from damages [67] DIGNITY – INTERPRETATION [68] Preliminary matters [68] Dignity in the UDHR, ICCPR and ICESCR [73] Dignity in the context of the HDCA, Human Rights Act and Privacy Act [88] Dignity and the tort of misuse of private information [93] The assessment of loss of dignity – whether subjective or objective [101] The basis on which damages for loss of dignity are to be assessed [103] The positions taken by the parties [108] THE ASSESSMENT OF QUANTUM [111] The...

10. Muraahi v Phillips Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and 55B1A2 Manu Ariki Marae [2013] Māori Appellate Court 528 (2013 APPEAL 528) [pdf, 266 KB]

    ...detriment of the trust. The 1999 transfer deprived the trust of its right to be recorded as the legal owner of 1.7912 ha reservation area. This formed the grounds for the claim that Areka Phillips’ actions constituted fraud. The transfer also forms the basis for the claim that Areka Phillips, as a trustee, was in breach of trust in arranging the transfer. The claim in personam also arises from these actions which are said to be to the detriment of the trust. 2013 Maori App...