Search Results

1. BQ v EI [2024] NZDT 427 (20 April 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...recover the $4,279.80 spent on repairing the head gasket. The buyer did not have evidence of other costs to hand, so the sum awarded is $4,279.80. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 20 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. BT v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 574 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...hear that the $14,000.00 plus $1000.00 payment is still available and agreed to receive that – that has been recorded as a settlement agreement of the Tribunal. Referee Perfect Date: 30 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. NQ v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 598 (9 August 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...brake-checking. Given that this practice is inherently dangerous and that it followed a tight lane change, I find that NQ is fully liable for causing the collision. Referee Perfect Date: 9 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. SU v KU [2024] NZDT 596 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...consider. 6. KU says that there has never been any discussion of the table being returned to SU, that he has been allowed to use it since he went flatting in September 2017 and that he was given the table by his parents in April 2022. SU’s former wife and KU’s mother, CU stated in a text message sent on 6 June 2023 that the table was gifted to KU in April 2022 upon her separation with SU. 7. As the applicant, SU is required to prove his case on the balance of probabilities....

5. McKeogh v Attorney-General (Referral back to Human Rights Commission) [2017] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...conference. Be that as it may, given the Tribunal’s current workload it is unlikely that a teleconference can be arranged inside the next two months. De facto, the Attorney-General is therefore likely (but not guaranteed) to have the two months requested. ORDERS [21] The following orders are made: [21.1] The application by the Attorney-General for an order under s 92D (that the complaint by the plaintiffs be referred back to the Human Rights Commission) is declined. [21.2] The...

6. Judge v Care Park New Zealand Limited [2023] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...vehicle that had over 20” parking tickets. Ms Threadgold asked Ms Pepere for the registration number, make and model of the vehicle and indicated Wintec would try and identify the staff member. Ms Pepere did not provide this additional information requested. [5] On 18 February 2016 Ms Threadgold emailed Ms Pepere granting permission to clamp the vehicle after 25 February 2016. Ms Threadgold also indicated that Wintec had located the owner of the vehicle and that the vehicle owner sa...

7. IN Ltd v NB [2022] NZDT 74 (22 February 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...made honestly. [21] Thus, the claim is dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Referee: C Hawes Date: 22 February 2022 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. CN v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 744 (26 November 2024) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...Tribunal to arrange the collection of the various garments which were provided to the Tribunal for this hearing. 39. The claim is dismissed. Referee: P Byrne Date: 26 November 2024. Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 95 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...contracted out of Marra and into a joint venture entity, and that he would receive the same benefits as those paid to Dominion employees. This was obviously a reference to his earlier conversations with Mr Bailey. [32] The email also referred to a request for an increase in salary; he said he had been given a company vehicle he had used on the joint venture project, as compensation for an increase. On the evidence presented to the Court, the provision of the vehicle was appar...

10. TTPPR-1 Notice giving prescribed information for defendant served in Australia [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    Form 1 r 6 Notice giving prescribed information for defendant served in Australia SECTIONS 8(1)(A) AND 15 TRANS-TASMAN PROCEEDINGS ACT 2010 (NZ) IF THE PERSON TO BE SERVED IS NOT DESCRIBED IN THE INITIATING DOCUMENT AS A DEFENDANT, SUBSTITUTE THE CORRECT DESCRIPTION IN THE HEADING OF THIS NOTICE. Please read this notice and the attached document very carefully. If you have any trouble understanding them, you should get legal advi...