Search Results

1. SG v QN [2022] NZDT 253 (16 December 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...party was at fault in what happened. Therefore, I find that QN cannot be held responsible for the crash and is not liable to pay for the damage. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 16 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

2. UL v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 383 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...provided, I cannot be satisfied that it was unreasonable that the laptop only lasted for three years, and therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Cowie DTR Date: 29 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

3. ED v MA [2023] NZDT 556 (18 April 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...acceptable quality, and thus she is liable for the cost of the visit to the vet. 9. The visit to the vet cost $110.00, and this is the amount MA must pay. Referee: M Wilson Date: 18 April 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. DC v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 539 (3 October 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...there. His was the phone handed to the man at 8.20pm. 4. DC claims $1200 from K Ltd, the owner of the K Ltd represented by KD, comprising: • $280, the sum he paid for his phone a few months earlier; and • $920 for stress and the loss of information etc on the phone. 5. The issue to be decided in the first instance is whether K Ltd took possession of the phone into its care. Did K Ltd take the phone into its possession under a bailment relationship? 6. A bailment is...

5. KC & UJ v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 29 (23 January 2023) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...for paint for the deck plus $50 labour and $25 for the outside light cover. A total $125.00 is ordered to be paid by X Ltd for the defects that were established. Referee Perfect Date: 23 January 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

6. CF v XQ Ltd [2023] NZDT 123 (10 March 2023) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...[2023] NZDT 123 APPLICANT CF RESPONDENT XQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: XQ Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,239.65 to CF on or before Friday 31 March 2023. Reasons: 1. On 14 September 2022, CF purchased a [computer] via [online platform] and paid $1,220.00 by bank transfer to an account in the name of XQ Ltd. He was promised that a shipping number would be released in two to three business days, but this did not happen. Six days later, XQ Ltd said that there was an attack...

7. KS & QS v ZA [2023] NZDT 421 (25 August 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...surveyor mark out the boundaries of the properties so that any new fence would be built on the boundary line. 3. KS and QS engaged a friend of theirs who was a surveyor to survey the boundary ‘off the record’. However, as this was the case, no formal report was produced and when ZA asked for one, KS and QS were unable to provide it. Being unsure that the pegs located by KS and QS friend were indeed the correct boundary markers, ZA did not agree to the building of the new fence.

8. QQ & TO v FN [2024] NZDT 697 (29 November 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...reasons I find the advertisement does not misrepresent the bracelet and I must dismiss this claim. 8. I am not required to consider the remaining issue. Referee: C Murphy Date: 29 November 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

9. QH Ltd v BD [2024] NZDT 283 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...Therefore, this suggests that the cheaper repair option has not been totally satisfactory. BD is lucky that QH Ltd did not insist on a full replacement. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 26 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

10. Paterson v Whangarei District Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 18 [pdf, 168 KB]

    ...Council to satisfy itself that the drainage and waterproofing associated with the retaining wall would be code compliant, and there is nothing on the Council file to show that the Council could satisfy itself of compliance. The Council could have requested a producer statement, or certificates, but it appears not to have done so. [72] The inadequate drainage gave rise to damage from internal leaks and to likely future damage. The Tribunal has concluded that the Council breac...