Search Results

1. DQ v OL [2024] NZDT 304 (3 May 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...repair, and based on the evidence I find the claimed costs to be actual, reasonable and consistent with the nature of the incident. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee Perfect Date: 3 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

2. TD Ltd v W Ltd [2024] NZDT 429 (23 May 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...$20,000.00. 8. The finding that a binding settlement was reached means that no further claim is possible by TD Ltd and the second issue above does not need to be addressed. Referee Perfect Date: 23 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

3. Fehling v Appleby (Strike-Out Application) [2013] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...Fehling was told that the reason was that complaints had been made to the Caretaker that he (Mr Fehling) had been using the pool, showers and toilets at the School. Mr Fehling strongly denies these allegations. By way of a request for personal information under the Privacy Act 1993, Mr Fehling sought the names of the individuals who had made the complaints. The School declined to provide that information, relying on s 27(1)(d) (disclosure of the information would likely endanger the sa...

4. IJ v K U Ltd [2020] NZDT 1549 (10 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...inspection is strong evidence the system was not legally compliant. Further, IJ was required to install an RPZ valve. K & U Ltd contracted with IJ to provide a legally compliant working system and it was not. Furthermore, K & U Ltd employees informed IJ on many occasions that the RPZ valve requirement was just an error in the paperwork and it was not. For these reasons I find K & U Ltd has not completed the work they contracted to complete with reasonable skill and care. I also...

5. BM v OZ Ors [2024] NZDT 109 (5 February 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...and inconvenience. 24. So I order OZ and ZB Ltd jointly and severally to pay BM the total sum of $1,999.99. Referee: G.M. Taylor Date: 5 February 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 5 of 6 Page 6 of 6 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

6. NQ v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 651 (21 August 2024) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...reasons above, C Limited must pay NQ $12,038.30, being $7,638.30 (the E Ltd invoice) plus $4,400.00 (part of the secured rental). Page 5 of 6 Referee: Ms Gayatri Jaduram Date: 21 August 2024 Page 6 of 6 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. Form-26_Criminal-Fixed-H-I.pdf [pdf, 188 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 26 Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules H & I Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 174 Udovenko v Offshore Marine Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...Authority that does not, of itself, amount to an abuse of process in terms of pursuing such a claim on a de novo challenge in this Court. The offer of payment for the six month's work was a matter before the Authority and can be pursued in a re-formulated claim in the Court. [10] In Bourne v Real Journeys Limited 3 Judge Couch referred to an earlier judgment of the full Court and held that the Court could hear and decide matters which were not actually determined by the Author...

9. Rata - Whataarakai No 1 Roadway and Lot 1 Deposited Plan 374627 [2020] Chief Judge's MB 74 (2020 CJ 74) [pdf, 432 KB]

   ...plan attached to the application. 5. The affected roadline is 400m long and crosses a steeply incised gully off Tapairu Road. From the material attached to the application it appears that the existing roadline was a paper road, opposed to a formed road. It is noted that the Central Hawkes Bay District Council would not consent to access being formed at the entry of the existing roadline where it adjoins Tapairu Road, due to safety concerns. The application lodged sought to realig...

10. BN v MV & KT [2023] NZDT 534 (5 October 2023) [pdf, 229 KB]

    ...that the issue with water entering the garage should have been disclosed to him at the time of purchasing the property. In particular, he said he asked specifically about water tightness of the garage and any issues with the retaining wall which forms part of the garage walls but was told by KT that nothing had been disclosed to her. 4. MV accepts that she and her husband had experienced one situation where water entered the garage but had installed a drain to deal with the problem. S...