Search Results

1. MK v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 293 (1 August 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...safely pack up and arrange for the return all the curtains purchased from S Ltd to them, with shipping of the boxes with the curtains to be paid for by S Ltd. Referee: C Price Date: 01 August 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 83 Kaikorai Service Centre Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 904 KB]

   ...application under s 50J of the Act, which occurred on 22 September 2016. [9] Finally, the objection challenged disclosure of communication to or from Foodstuffs as not relevant. The challenges to the objections [10] By the time the parties requested this dispute be resolved on the papers the outstanding issues had narrowed, so they did not involve any argument about documents being subject to legal professional privilege or communication to or from Foodstuffs. The remaining iss...

3. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.9 September 2023 [pdf, 927 KB]

   ...Operational Policy for providing early legal advice for disputes under the Care of Children Act 2004 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully ex...

4. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v2.0 October 2023 [pdf, 586 KB]

   ...Policy for providing early legal advice for disputes under the Care of Children Act 2004 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes...

5. T Ltd v EO [2024] NZDT 814 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...dated 27 and 29 June 2024 affirmed the contract. 10. EO disputes that he had engaged T Ltd. He says that his initial communication was exploratory in nature and that T Ltd were never properly authorised to act on his behalf. 11. A contract is formed when there is an agreement between the parties, or where there is a meeting of the minds between them. Often this relies on an offer, and acceptance of that offer. There must also be certainty about the terms that have been agreed to.

6. [2019] NZEmpC 57 Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...documents, together with compiling an index and 5 Xtreme Dining Ltd t/a Think Steel v Dewar [2017] NZEmpC 10 at [32]. providing copies. He also said that Mr Gildenhuys had to respond to a request from Cornish Trucks regarding further documentation. In his original claim, Mr Gildenhuys had sought a further day for preparation of the common bundle but concedes that two days in total, covering both the list of documents on dis...

7. Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki nui-a-Rua Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...consistent with articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act.4 Whether s 27(3) at issue 9. Clause 24(3) of the Bill excludes damages and other forms of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure by the Crown to comply with a protocol under the Bill. 10. This clause may be seen to raise the issue of compliance with s 27(3) of the Bill of Rights Act, namely the right to bring ci...

8. Jones v Accident Compensation Corporation (Backdated Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 117 [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...medical information. The Corporation sought further information from Mr Jones but did not receive any. [14] On 20 November 2017, the Corporation wrote to Mr Jones declining his application for weekly compensation. The Corporation noted that, if the requested information was provided, then the Corporation might be able to reassess backdated weekly compensation. [15] On 1 December 2017, Dr Hefford wrote to the Corporation providing medical information regarding Mr Jones’ treatmen...

9. LCRO 119/2016 XY, ZW, QM, and ABC Lawyers v TQ (16 November 2018) [pdf, 466 KB]

   ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Enforcement of loans ........................................................................................................................... 7 Witnessing signed unprepared (blank) Authority and Instruction (A&I) forms ..................................... 7 Standards Committee decision ....................................................................

10. Argyle v Macdee McLennan Construction Ltd & Ors [2012] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 361 KB]

    ...Proffitt, the assessor and Thomas Wutzler, the claimants’ expert. Some defects were also mentioned in Mr Prouse’s report referred to by the parties. Roof and drip edge [25] There was a failure to turn down the ends of the metal roof to form a drip edge (exacerbated by low pitch) and a failure to form a drip edge to the barge flashing over the kitchen roof. There was a lack of cover to the flashings on the north east and south west elevations. The building underlay had...