Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11302 items matching your search terms

  1. PI v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 745 (22 October 2024) [pdf, 191 KB]

    ...CGA? 16. As I do not find that the spa was of unacceptable quality, PI is not entitled to a remedy under the CGA. 17. His claim is, therefore, dismissed. Referee: S Malaviya Date: 22 October 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

  2. GT v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 554 (20 July 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 554 APPLICANT GT RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. GT purchased her daughter’s school uniform from O Ltd. In December 2023 she purchased a size 12 skirt, and after taking it home realised that it did not fit her daughter. GT returned the skirt to O Ltd, swapped it for a size 14 and purchased a second size 14 skirt. She took the cloth...

  3. BQ v EI [2024] NZDT 427 (20 April 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...recover the $4,279.80 spent on repairing the head gasket. The buyer did not have evidence of other costs to hand, so the sum awarded is $4,279.80. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 20 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

  4. BT v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 574 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...hear that the $14,000.00 plus $1000.00 payment is still available and agreed to receive that – that has been recorded as a settlement agreement of the Tribunal. Referee Perfect Date: 30 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

  5. NQ v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 598 (9 August 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...brake-checking. Given that this practice is inherently dangerous and that it followed a tight lane change, I find that NQ is fully liable for causing the collision. Referee Perfect Date: 9 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

  6. SU v KU [2024] NZDT 596 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...consider. 6. KU says that there has never been any discussion of the table being returned to SU, that he has been allowed to use it since he went flatting in September 2017 and that he was given the table by his parents in April 2022. SU’s former wife and KU’s mother, CU stated in a text message sent on 6 June 2023 that the table was gifted to KU in April 2022 upon her separation with SU. 7. As the applicant, SU is required to prove his case on the balance of probabilities....

  7. Wentzel v Collie [2012] NZWHT Auckland 15 [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...had detailed in his assessor’s report. Mr Dibley appeared as a witness for the claimants. He had been the inspector for DBH when the two determinations were made and had prepared two substantive reports and a cladding report for DBH which formed the basis of the determinations. Mr Dibley gave evidence contemporaneously with Mr Templeman. [34] In his report Mr Templeman identified four key deficiencies causing current damage. These were: Cracking in the cladding w...

  8. LCRO 119/2016 XY, ZW, QM, and ABC Lawyers v TQ (16 November 2018) [pdf, 466 KB]

    ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Enforcement of loans ........................................................................................................................... 7 Witnessing signed unprepared (blank) Authority and Instruction (A&I) forms ..................................... 7 Standards Committee decision ....................................................................

  9. [2021] NZEmpC 199 Lawton v Steel Pencil Holdings Ltd [pdf, 415 KB]

    ...strengthening enforcement of employment standards is also reflected in the first reading of the Bill as to the intended purpose of what became Part 9A.10 The Regulatory Impact Statement prepared by MBIE11 and the Cabinet paper12 that recommended the reforms also referred to the intention being to increase directors’ and others’ liability in circumstances where a company is unable to rectify a breach. [33] That the regime created by the 2016 Amendment was more wide-ranging than

  10. Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki nui-ā-Rua Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 962 KB]

    ...consistent with articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act.4 Whether s 27(3) at issue 9. Clause 24(3) of the Bill excludes damages and other forms of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure by the Crown to comply with a protocol under the Bill. 10. This clause may be seen to raise the issue of compliance with s 27(3) of the Bill of Rights Act, namely the right to bring ci...