Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 64 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...legal framework since 1975. It has not been static and its strategic direction and focus have changed as the times and circumstances have demanded. There have been dramatic changes, as with the expansion of our jurisdiction to consider historical claims in 1985 and the move to a district­based inquiry model in the mid­1990s, and more gradual changes, as we adjusted our inquiry process to ensure that we could hear and report on the claims before us in the most mean­ ingful, rele v...

2. BD v AN [2020] NZDT 1333 (22 June 2020) [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...finding that he had done so. 15. For these reasons, the claim is awarded in full, but the counterclaim is unable to succeed. Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 22 June 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply

3. HRRT Statement of Reply (Privacy) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...for this reply. Please choose one and give the details.  Email  Postal address Email address __________________________________________________________________________ THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Statement of Reply When to use this form Use this form if you are named as a defendant in a ‘Statement of Claim’ under section 98 of the Privacy Act 2020 and wish to file a ‘Statement of Reply’ in response to the allegations made against you. Completing this form •...

4. P Singh v Kumar [2011] NZIACDT 24 (18 August 2011) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...The Tribunal set aside the decision. The Adviser had established he took appropriate steps to file the submissions, and reasonably believed the Tribunal had acknowledged receipt. http://www.iaa.govt.nz/ 3 [13] The Adviser’s submissions requested an oral hearing, and set out a response to the complaint. The Tribunal determined the Adviser should have the opportunity of presenting his case at an oral hearing. [14] The parties were informed the procedure at the hearing would ref...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 76 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 52 KB]

   ...Bruce Stewart QC has appeared with Mr Nicholson this morning for the plaintiff, Mr Stewart being recently brought into the matter. He, having considered the proceedings, has indicated that the plaintiff wishes to file a third amended statement of claim. [2] This third amended statement of claim, which has been handed up in a draft or proposed draft form this morning, effectively discontinues the proceedings against the second defendant, Jacob Roest and the third defendant...

6. [2024] NZEmpC 149 Osborne v Callaghan Innovation [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...Callaghan Innovation has applied for them to be fixed. It seeks costs of $24,330.20 on a Category 2 Band B basis in accordance with the Court’s Practice Directions Guideline Scale.3 [5] Mr Osborne opposed Callaghan Innovation’s application and requested that any amount awarded against him be reduced from what was claimed. He did not indicate how much the claim should be reduced by or otherwise state what could be considered a just sum to award. [6] In addition to submiss...

7. Balatbat v Sparks [2016] NZIACDT 27 [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...adviser was involved in the process until a complete set of documents arrived from the Philippines, ready to lodge with Immigration New Zealand. Mr Sparks reviewed the documents, certified he had assisted the complainant with recording the information on the application, and filed the papers with Immigration New Zealand. [3] The regulation of licensed immigration advisers is unusual; there is a prohibition on unlicensed persons providing immigration services. Some persons, such...

8. LU v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 182 (25 June 2023) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...reasonable and in keeping with the price given? Was the price given by C Ltd a quote or an estimate? Was the price for the 140mm pine decking ($8,058.45) shown on the pricing document calculated incorrectly? 3. A legally binding contract is formed where both parties intend to contract on agreed terms. For a contract to be enforceable the terms of the contract need to be certain and clear. 4. The parties dispute whether the price given by C Ltd was a quote or an estimate. In addi...

9. [2015] NZEmpC 7 Alatipi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...complaint [9] Prisoner X did not give evidence in the case but he was interviewed by Principal Corrections Officer, Ms Cheryl Chandler, on the day of the incident. Ms Chandler's record of the interview was typed up on a Corrections IR.07 Form 01 and signed off at 1350 hrs on 2 July 2011. Ms Chandler stated: … When we got to the Management unit [Prisoner X] gave me the following statement. On the 2nd July 2011 I [Prisoner X] was in HM 4 wing. At approximately 0835h...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 80 Premier Events Group and Anor v Beattie and Ors [pdf, 64 KB]

    ...if the pleading cannot be relied on. [18] That may or may not be so but I think, on balance, that the question of prejudice is neutral as between PEGL on the one hand, and Messrs Beattie and Regan on the other. So I do not accede to PEGL’s request that the proceeding be declared to be a nullity simply because there is no prejudice to the individual parties in doing so. [19] The ultimate test to be applied by the Court is what is necessary to do justice in the particular circum...