Search Results

1. ST v PS Ltd [2023] NZDT 65 (15 March 2023) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...of this matter took place at 2pm today, however as PS Ltd did not answer calls made to the numbers provided for them, the hearing proceeded in their absence. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 15 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. TC v UMA [2024] NZDT 260 (5 March 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...super-charging” – it was silent as to upgrade costs and I find that coverage of those by UMA cannot reasonably be implied as a term. The claim is therefore dismissed. Referee Perfect Date: 5 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

3. KD & LD v XN Ltd [2024] NZDT 215 (5 March 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...with the purchase. It follows that they are entitled to a return of the deposit that they paid. [9] Thus, XN Ltd must pay the applicants $1,000.00. Referee: C Hawes Date: 5 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

4. S Ltd v OB [2024] NZDT 226 (20 March 2024) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...the bus and the costs to repair the damage. I am satisfied on the evidence provided by J Ltd that the repair costs are reasonable. OB is to pay S Ltd/J Ltd $2,170.63. Referee: Kaho Date: 20 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. LQ & QQ v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 463 (30 November 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...sufficient to rectify the problem. However, the failure cannot be properly rectified by sanding and brooming, which would only be a temporary and partial solution. 10. LQ and QQ are entitled to be put in the same position as if the contract had been performed properly, and I accept that this will require the turf to be removed and new turf laid. [Turf Provider] has quoted $5,325.07 for the cost of supply and installation. It is necessary to deduct from this cost the unpaid balance $4,05...

6. IN v XI [2023] NZDT 780 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...before the collision the rear bumper had no damage and was in a good state of repair. e) The repairs that were done are consistent with the damage sustained. Referee: T Prowse Date: 19 December 2023. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

7. A Ltd v NT & TH [2023] NZDT 764 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...produced that this invoice dated 1/4/21 in the amount of $10,627.94 is for justified extras to the contract price and have not been already paid for by the respondents and then charged again in this claim. 9. The respondents rely on an earlier “Proforma Invoice” dated 3/2/20 for $22,500.00 and an email in relation to their allegation they have been charged twice for this work. They also directed me to a portion of the applicant’s bank statement that shows the earlier invoice was...

8. TX v CD [2024] NZDT 375 (5 June 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...take place, and I’m sure the applicant’s insurer will be willing to discuss a payment arrangement. Referee: John Hogan Date: 5 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

9. [2025] NZREADT 22 - ZD & NK v Liu & Zareian (18 June 2025) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...were identified as Mr Zareian and Ms Zareian. Under “Other Disclosures”, the vendors answered “no” to the question whether there was any completed work which might have required a consent.1 At the time of listing, the vendors did not inform the Zareians of the unconsented building work. [9] The property was marketed from about 17 August 2021 by the Zareians. 1 Agency agreement (4 August 2021) at [21.2]; BoD at 153. 3 [10] The Zareians were subsequently inform...

10. Galvin [2011] NZWHT Auckland 10 [pdf, 91 KB]

    1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 10 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6373: JANICE GALVIN – 20 EGMONT STREET, TE ARO ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Janice Galvin is the owner of a leaky home. On 10 August 2000 she filed a claim with the Department of Building and Housing....