Search Results

1. US v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 776 (16 October 2024) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...therefore compensation must take into consideration depreciation. I find that $5,000.00 compensation for the reduction in the value of the spa is appropriate. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 16 October 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

2. LL v KE [2024] NZDT 610 (16 July 2024) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...misrepresentation that entitles LL to compensation, I do not need to consider the final two issues. 12. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 16 July 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

3. Q Ltd v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 437 (16 May 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...back the keys to the landlord, and assumed that was the end of the matter. 5. However, more than three months later, W wrote to the landlord changing its position and demanding remedial work. The landlord completed that work, and wrote to the (now-former) tenant on 7 December 2023 to demand payment for the make-good work it had done, and also to demand that the tenant repair damage to a wall resulting from an unknown person removing the signage that the tenant had left behind. CI030...

4. EW v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 887 (19 December 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...operating. I do not see anything unreasonable in that. 22. For these reasons, EW is entitled to receive a full refund of the purchase price of $299.00. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 19 December 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

5. IC & SC v DQ [2025] NZDT 96 (24 March 2025) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...apportioned between the parties for a new fence? Is there an adequate boundary fence? 8. There is currently no fence on the boundary. 9. The Applicants have supplied an email from their property agent who contacted the previous owner. She informed that there may have been some wire in amongst the trees at the boundary line, but it was never obvious as a fence. The tree line was always treated as the boundary from their perspective. 10. I am satisfied that there is no adequat...

6. MN & KL v B Ltd [2025] NZDT 73 (20 March 2025) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...to be compensated for the cost of a new starter motor and for some post driving costs they incurred while their tractor was being fixed. 4. The issues to be determined to resolve the claim are: (a) What was B Ltd engaged to do and did it perform its service with reasonable care and skill? (b) If not, what loss can KL and MN show they have incurred that they are entitled to be compensated for? What was B Ltd engaged to do and did it perform its service with reasonable care a...

7. QE v MG & B Ltd [2025] NZDT 166 (6 May 2025) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...site and to the place of sale, $347.00. The insurer agrees to allow some time to reach agreement with the respondent on how this amount will be paid. Hannan DTR Disputes Tribunal Referee 06 May 2025 Page 3 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. Retto v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 69 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...met with Mr Standing and concluded he was not providing the services he agreed to provide. 6 [49] Mr Retto terminated Mr Standing’s engagement and requested that Mr Standing refund the money he had paid. Mr Standing ignored the requests. [50] The Tribunal upheld the complaint. The evidence supporting the complaint established: [50.1] Mr Standing obtained fees dishonestly through misrepresentations, [50.2] He failed to account for the money he dishonestly solicited....

9. [2021] NZACC 2 - Judkins v ACC (5 January 2021) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...Ferguson reported a diagnosis of Mr Savage having significant low back pain and lower limb radiculopathy secondary to LB/S1 disc herniation. [4] On 11 June 2018, Mr Judkins’ general practitioner (“GP”), Dr Bjornholdt, filed an ACC injury claim form for pain in the lumbar and thoracic spine as a result of a gradual process. The claim form described “repetitive strain and repetitive injuries over the years working as a plumber”. [5] On 25 June 2018, Mr Judkins completed...

10. Lohr v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs) [2016] NZHRRT 36 [pdf, 60 KB]

    ...BY DEFENDANT1 BACKGROUND [1] In its decision in Lohr v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZHRRT 31 given on 29 September 2016 the Tribunal found the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) had discharged its burden of proving the information withheld from Dr Lohr fell within the exceptions in ss 27(1)(c) and 29(1)(a) of the Privacy Act 1993. As information 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Lohr v Accident Comp...