Search Results

1. February Legal Aid News [pdf, 525 KB]

   ...employer’s name or type of benefit)  The application must include whether the customer has control of a trust and/or interest in property (please include property address and market value) If you have any questions in relation to any of this information please do not hesitate to contact the legal aid office 0800 2 LEGAL AID. Repayment of legal aid for domestic violence proceedings An applicant for a protection order in domestic violence proceedings is exempt from the requirem...

2. EL v FO [2022] NZDT 8 (28 April 2022) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...the above issues, as I have found the cake was iced in accordance with instructions, and as EL took possession of the cake, I find no refund is justified. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 28 April 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

3. Litchfield & Wells [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The submission from Marie Litchfield and Graham Wells in response to the assessor’s report. The submission from Alan Light. The assessor’s report dated 19 November 2009. The letter from Laura Tait of the...

4. Holt & Ors as Trustees of the Kahala Trust v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 15 [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...saddle flashings. Therefore they considered the membrane installer was required to ensure weathertightness by using upstands at various junctions. The junctions between the waterproofing membrane and the block work were in their opinion poorly formed and this resulted in water Page | 6 infiltrating deck areas at the junction of the membrane and column upstand. [13] Both Mr Nevill and Mr Maiden also agreed that the membrane installer had not complied with the require...

5. [2018] NZSSAA 33 (18 July 2018) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...question is now before the Authority pursuant to the consent order of the High Court dated 5 May 2016. That order followed a joint memorandum filed by the parties, and the joint memorandum is referred to in the order. This order of the High Court formulated the issues for the Authority in the following way: 46.2 The matter is remitted to the Authority under High Court Rule 21.14(b) and (d) for reconsideration of the question of law in accordance with Williams J’s decision outlined...

6. KD v N Ltd & HX [2023] NZDT 424 (3 July 2023) [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...to the [Address 1] premises (which he says was a high risk flooding area) and as a result of that negligence his bike got water damaged as a result of the 27 January floods. 19. In evidence, KD provided a [Address 1] Network Modelling System Performance Report dated March 2008 which was prepared for (the then) [Suburb] City Council (2008 Report). It says (in relation to the [Address 1] Business District) that this is one of the largest areas of flooding as a result of its flat topogr...

7. BS v KC & DC [2024] NZDT 489 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...5. The parties have each raised issues about the notices served by the other in this claim. 6. KC and DC say that the notices served by BS on 5 and 12 December 2023 were not valid. They say the first valid notice (which included all of the information required by the FA) was received by them on 14 December 2023. They say that the 21 day period for serving a cross notice expired on 4 January 2024, but that BS filed this claim on 3 January 2024. They suggest this means the claim is in...

8. Family Legal Advice Service operational policy version 1.4 [pdf, 479 KB]

   ...Policy for providing early legal advice for disputes under the Care of Children Act 2004 Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.4 August 2016 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully exclude...

9. [2024] NZEmpC 116 Osborne v Callaghan Innovation [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...something else. He was asked what serious wrongdoing was being alleged. The General Manager confirmed that, in accordance with the protected disclosure policy, his confidentiality would be maintained. [21] The same day Mr Osborne provided the requested clarification, including describing the nature of the matter he wanted to raise as grossly improper mismanagement. He attributed this conduct to the manager who was responsible for the redundancy that affected him. In providing th...

10. P and R v EQC and MIS [2024] CEIT-2023-0014 [pdf, 331 KB]

    ...hearing defences which might resolve applications in their entirety as initial issues. Doing so fulfils the Tribunal’s purpose of providing fair, speedy, flexible, and cost-effective dispute resolution.1 2) Subsequently, the parties have jointly requested that this matter should be referred to the High Court as a question of law under s53 of the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Act 2019 (the Act). S53 has been used once before when the former chair referred a question in...