10904 items matching your search terms
Claim No: 1240 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim Between Auckland City Council (as assignee) Claimant And Mark Brian Russell Respondent Final Determination 14 February 2006 1. Index Para No Heading Page 1. Index 1 2. Summary of Determination 1 3. Quantification 1 2. Summary of Determination 2.1 In the Partial Determination dated 21 September 2005 I found that the Aucklan...
...to effect service. He has made at least 12 visits to addresses known to have been either those of the defendant at the time of previous proceedings or those of his sister and his niece. The defendant’s former solicitor has not responded to requests as to whether she is authorised to accept service on behalf of the defendant. [3] The investigator was able to speak to people at the addresses visited. He was told that Mr MacDonald was not there and the door was closed before fur...
Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 4 Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Non-Fixed Fee Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead Provider Law firm Court type District Court High Court Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Description of proceedings Administration Case Review Case management memorandum Committal...
...can affect his entitlement. He accepts that as he is married he is only entitled to New Zealand Superannuation paid at half the married rate. [2] Part of the application process required by the Chief Executive is that applicants must submit information relating to their spouse. The Appellant submitted his application, which included a good deal of information regarding his wife. It included her name, date of birth, 2 gender, contact details, citizenship, where she was b...
...with arts 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights Act [6]. Exclusion of remedy of compensation/Crown Forest Assets Act 1989 10. Clause 22(3) excludes any form of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure of the Crown to comply with a protocol under Part 2 of the Bill. Clause 104(2) prevents any court or tribunal from doing or omitting to do anything, between the date of settlement and t...
...was considerable delay before a case management teleconference was able to be convened. On 1 June 2018, the Secretary emailed Ms Gordon about arrangements for the conference. Ms Gordon replied advising that she was no longer acting for Mr Smith and requested that the Secretary contact his new representative, Kevin Murray. [6] On 11 June 2018, Mr Murray advised the Secretary that he had attempted to contact Mr Smith via telephone and email but had had no response. On 12 June 2018, the Se...
...respondent S McKechnie and T Bremner, counsel for intervener Judgment: 23 March 2022 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN [1] Ms Fechney is an employment advocate who recently has been acting in a number of cases in which employees, or former employees, have challenged the application of the Government’s COVID-19 mandates. One of the people who was challenging the application of the mandates was GF, a former employee of New Zealand Customs Service (Custo...
...from Mr Thorp’s statement that he had not been promoted to the maintenance manager’s position. The company was invited to address this grievance by providing reasons for that decision and to attend mediation. A response by 30 August 2019 was requested. [13] Mr Thorp did not wait to respond. On 27 August he reiterated the points made previously, noting that the company was going through the consultation process about the proposed restructuring. Mr Coetzee was informed that...
...trading as JJ Lawyers [(JJL)]. [2] They made the complaint with the aim of recovering from [JJL] the sum of $8050 they paid in advance to Mr FT, trading as [LV] Law Specialists, for employment dispute services for Mrs HN which they say were never performed. [3] In their complaint, they submitted that [JJL] should be ordered to compensate them in that amount because, by permitting Mr FT to use a room in or adjacent to their office premises that was not differentiated from those by si...
...advised: This is a clinical picture of established osteoarthritis (OA) of the right ankle joint symptomatically aggravated by the claim accident but not caused by it. A direct causal link of the right ankle OA, now requiring treatment, to the claimed personal injury by the accident of 16 October 2018 cannot be established. [9] On 16 April 2019, Mr Fong provided further comment in relation to whether or not Mr Brooks had suffered a fracture of the right talus as a result of his acc...