Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11482 items matching your search terms

  1. [2014] NZEmpC 213 Hixon v Campbell and Ors substantive [pdf, 264 KB]

    ...employee records of a number of AHV’s employees to him. 1 Hixon (Labour Inspector) v Campbell [2014] NZERA Christchurch 4. 2 28 April 2014. These included copies of job application forms, employment agreements, and tax forms. Mrs Campbell also provided Mr Hixon with a summary of wages and deductions in respect of individual employees. Whilst these records were incomplete, he was able to compile a schedule of tool allow...

  2. Taniora v Crown - Pukemakoiti 2 and 4 (2018) 390 Aotea MB 268 (390 AOT 268) [pdf, 357 KB]

    ...Wi, Thomas Tuwhangai, Moera Hughes, Mary Crown and Morgan Rata.3 Procedural history [6] Ms Taniora filed the application for enforcement of obligations of the trust on 20 June 2017, on behalf of the Taniora Maru Whānau Trust. The applicant requested the hearing be held in Hamilton as she resides there, which was opposed by the trustees. I issued directions on 29 August 2017 allowing for the case to be heard in Hamilton for the purpose of taking the applicant’s evidence, and f...

  3. [2016] NZEmpC 137 Bennett and Others v Michaels and Others [pdf, 179 KB]

    ...adopting Sumption LJ, quoting Lazarus Estates Ltd v Beasley [1956] 1 QB 702 at 712 per Denning LJ. 11 At [100]. 12 Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne [1933] All ER 109, [1933] Ch 935 at 114,956. I am quite satisfied that this company was formed as a device, a stratagem, in order to mask the effective carrying on of a business of Mr. E. B. Horne. The purpose of it was to try to enable him, under what is a cloak or a sham, to engage in business which, on consideration of the a...

  4. [2015] NZEmpC 107 Zespri International Ltd v Yu interlocutory [pdf, 146 KB]

    ...the Authority’s power where that issue is now moot in the Authority. The question may recur in the proceedings currently before the Court but different legislative and evidential requirements may apply to it in this forum. [16] Both parties requested that the Court continue to hear and decide Zespri’s challenge to the Authority’s determination. The orders that I make will cover the evidentiary/privilege/relevance questions in this Court as they would have in the Authority....

  5. ED v CC [2022] NZDT 228 (25 November 2022) [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 228 APPLICANT ED RESPONDENT CC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. CC emailed ED regarding the purchase of quail eggs and quails. 2. ED replied sending some information and proposing some dates to send a breeding group of quails, eggs and feed. 3. CC responded saying that she would love to proceed and asking if she could get the birds a little later. She also asked ED for his recommendation abo...

  6. RN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Cover and Entitlements) [2025] NZACC 140 (1 September 2025) [pdf, 378 KB]

    ...Registry seeking an extension of time for compliance with the Order. The extension was subsequently opposed by the Corporation. (b) On 8 July 2024 at 11:03am, the appellant personally emailed the Registry, but did not notify the Corporation, requesting a copy of the review transcripts. (c) On 8 July 2024 at 12:30pm, the appellant personally emailed the Registry (copying in her then advocate and counsel for the Corporation) repeating her request for an extension of time. The ap...

  7. KQ & OS v TN Ltd [2024] NZDT 244 (25 March 2024) [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...basis for such an award given that there has been no breach of the contract by KQ and OS in this case. 40. For these reasons the counterclaim is dismissed. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 25 March 2024 Page 6 of 6 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

  8. BB v NC [2024] NZDT 127 (16 April 2024) [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...because of the leaking that resulted from the faulty drainage system that had previously been installed. [22] Thus, NC must pay BB $28,874.06. Referee: C Hawes Date: 16 April 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  9. Tweeddale v Pearson [pdf, 405 KB]

    ...house. The cracks are more numerous on the north-east and north-west sides of the house – the sides receiving the most sunshine. Some cracks propagate from window (and other) corners, but not all such corners have cracks. They appear to have formed over a period of time, and we suspect that they are continuing to 7 propagate. The spacing of the cracks varies, but in a number of areas appear to conform with stud and dwang lines. No control joints were incorporated in the pla...

  10. Malik v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 7 [pdf, 73 KB]

    SUMMARY Case: Malik v Auckland Council File No: TRI-2010-100-000004/DBH 05561 Citation: [2011] NZWHT Auckland 07 Adjudicator: K D Kilgour Date of Decision: 25 January 2011 Background The claimants brought a claim regarding their home which they purchased in 2006. They sought full remedial costs from the four remaining respondents to the claim: The first respondent: Auckland City Council, the territorial authority. The sixth respondent: Jin Bin Qui. Facts Octo...