Search Results

1. HO & KT v QN Ltd [2021] NZDT 1708 (21 December 2021) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...was evicted on 15 July 2021. 5. HO and KT contend that QN Ltd breached its contractual obligations to them by failing to follow up properly with the tenant, failing to ensure the tenant had received the notice and failing to keep them properly informed about the lack of response from the tenant upon attempts at contact. 6. They claim $23,355.50, being $14,325.75 late settlement penalty paid to their purchaser, Council rates of $269.12, loan repayment from 4 June to 23 July of $207...

2. DX v STX & SCX [2023] NZDT 493 (2 October 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...headstone for her mother. She began making payments towards the second headstone, which was fully paid by 2022. 7. In December 2021, ON Ltd sold the business to SCX, STX’s niece. SCX operated the business as a sole trader. 8. DX was informed of the change of ownership, and she dealt with SCX after December 2021. 9. DX made several requests to view the completed headstones but was not given that opportunity. 10. DX did not see the headstones until 3 June 2023, the day bef...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 130 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...The plaintiff filed a document entitled “Application Regarding Matters of Law” on 10 February. The document set out the reasons why Miss Scarborough considered that the Court should refer the matter back to the Authority; advised that she had requested an investigation into her dismissal by the Ministry of Social Development; contended that the Authority member had not carried out a thorough investigation and did not have material evidence to support her determination; and that...

4. BU v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 18 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...rehearing should be ordered in this instance. Therefore, B Ltd’s application for a rehearing is refused, and referee Jadurum’s order stands. Referee: C D Boys Date: 30 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. Sheeran v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2024] NZACC 130 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ............................................................................................................................... [3] Facts ............................................................................................................................ [4] The Claim ............................................................................................................ [5] Lump Sum Application .........................................................................................

6. Hartley v Balemi [pdf, 401 KB]

   ...plaster cladding has resulted in rot and damage to internal linings”. They were claiming for the estimated costs of repairs to remedy the problems at a figure of $300,000.00. 4.2 As a part of the preparations for the hearing, the Owners were requested to provide more details and particulars about their claims. This was done before the respondents were required to file their Responses pursuant to section 28 of the WHRS Act. The Owners identified a list of the problems with the...

7. Y v Xue [2015] NZIACDT 6 (13 February 2015) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar Between S Y and R Y Complainants AND Jia (Christina) Xue Adviser No information identifying the complainants to be published DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Mr A Dumbleton, lawyer, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Auckland Complainants: Mr A Tsang, Prestige Lawyers, Auckland...

8. What happens next

   ...claim Once we receive your notice of claim, we’ll send you an acknowledgement and a receipt for your application fee. Phone conference & directions hearing The Authority may hold a phone conference before the hearing to make sure everyone has the information they need. It may also arrange a directions hearing to ensure progress is being made on the claim. The hearing Time & place At least 10 days before your case is due to be heard, we’ll tell you the day and time of your hearing. H...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Taxation and Charities Review Authority >
   3. Tax Disputes

9. AY Ltd v ZB Ltd [2014] NZDT 676 (26 September 2014) [pdf, 16 KB]

   ...and that all components were made on a CNC machine. [9] The most important and relevant of all the evidence is that ZB Limited themselves took over the construction of the kitset for AY Limited’s client as a result of the dispute, after various forms of assistance were offered to AY Limited and the dispute could not be resolved. The work has recently been completed and fully signed off by Council without there having been any changes to the components of the kitset originally suppl...

10. LCRO 207/2015 CA v BE (21 August 2018) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...that are first raised at the review stage of the proceedings. The Parties’ Arguments [34] Mr ZK identified Mrs CA’s main concern, (described by him as her “highest point of objection”) as concern that Mr BE had refused to comply with request to ensure that his client’s complaints were kept confidential. As this argument was advanced, it appeared to be the case that it was being suggested that Mr BE had given indication of his intention to interview potential witnesses...