Search Results

1. Zhang & Cao v Chen [2018] NZIACDT 11 (5 April 2018) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...in the invidious position of making large investments into companies where a person nominated by the adviser was the sole director. The complainant apparently did not meet the sole director, and was not provided with his contact details when requested. His address registered with the Companies Office was the same as the adviser’s address disclosed in a document before the Tribunal. Fees purportedly for the services of that director were allegedly paid to the director’s moth...

2. C Ltd v KQ [2022] NZDT 1 (14 March 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...a house she was selling. Unfortunately goods supplied for the purpose were stolen during the staging. C LTD lodged a claim with their insurer. The insurance payment to C LTD was $15,941.92 after the deduction of the $2,500.00 excess. C LTD requested KQ to pay the excess, but she declined. The claim is for the $2,500.00 excess to be paid by KQ. 2. C LTD provided a quote for the staging contract and is relying on the ‘Terms’ supplied with that quote. The last term states...

3. TN v PO Ltd [2023] NZDT 570 (16 November 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...on the companies’ genuine website alerting users to the fraudulent use of the company names on [social media] by person/s unknown. 3. The only evidence about who TN might actually have been dealing with through [online marketplace] is in the form of a photograph sent to TN by the seller, of a man holding his photo ID drivers’ license next to his face. The man on the drivers’ license and the man in the photograph sent with the license appear to be the same person, but of course it...

4. BD v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 350 (7 March 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...During the course of some of the work, BD acknowledged he was working at home, and he would have observed the expansive nature of the work. 14. HB says he occasionally discussed with the applicant about what was happening, and at some point informed the applicant that he would likely have a legal case against the previous owner for failing to disclose the broken septic system when the house was sold. 15. HB says as the work progressed and in discussions with the applicant, he also r...

5. MSC v Scholes [2013] NZIACDT 71 (25 November 2013) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...appropriate. In addition, she failed to initiate the professional engagement and document her instructions in accordance with the Code of Conduct. [5] The Tribunal gave the parties the opportunity to address the Tribunal in relation to sanctions. It also requested that the Registrar provide information regarding the cost of investigating the complaint. [6] In the course of responding, both parties revisited factual matters. [7] This present decision addresses two issues: [7.1] The p...

6. MacDonald v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury/Costs on Review) [2023] NZACC 175 [pdf, 339 KB]

   ...Injury, Causation s 26; Costs on Review s 148 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________________________________________ [1] In respect of appeal ACR 306/21, three issues are identified: (a) Cover in relation to a claimed injury, namely a below knee amputation (right leg). This is claimed to the be the consequence of an insect bite, but said to have been sustained after onset of significant symptoms of substantial vascular disease; (b) Provision o...

7. Clark v Trustees of Poukawa 9G and others trust (2011) 6 Takitimu MB 285 (6 TKT 285) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...expenses and copies of legal and accounting advice. The trustees did not provide this information. [47] The general courts have long held that a trustee is not generally obliged to volunteer documents to beneficiaries. However, if a beneficiary requests it, the trustee, in most cases, must provide trust documents to the beneficiary and an accounting in respect of it. 14 [48] The leading New Zealand authority on what constitutes „trust documents‟ is Manukau City Council v...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 35 Coy v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 592 KB]

   ...station [143] Constructive dismissal? [159] Application of s 122 Employment Relations Act 2000 [206] An observation [214] Remedies for unjustified disadvantages [216] Costs [217] Introduction [1] The issues in this proceeding between a former police officer and the Commissioner of Police as her employer, include:  whether the Commissioner disadvantaged Christine Coy unjustifiably in her employment; and  whether Ms Coy was dismissed constructively;  if so, whet...

9. MLC - Form 16 - Notice of proceedings [pdf, 75 KB]

   Page 1 For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/courts/maori-land-court MLC 11/14 - 11 The Māori Land Court of New Zealand / Māori Appellate Court of New Zealand (Please select the name of the Māori Land Court District in which some or all of the lands or the subject matter of the application is located) Please select one District Taitokerau Waikato Maniapoto Waiariki Tairāwhiti Tākitimu Aotea Te Waipounamu TO: .................................................................

10. [2007] NZEmpC AC 8B/07 Blaker v B & D Doors (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 142 KB]

    ...the material to the scrap dealer and then showed me the cash that he had received. Julian would not tell me who the other employee was until I said we know Henry Henry put the material in the trailer. Julian then confirmed it was Henry who requested Julian to take the material and also his intention was to give Henry the cash. I asked Julian if we could discuss this with Henry at 11:30 on Thursday morning which was acceptable he replied. Wednesday 7 December approx 2:45pm...