Search Results

1. Evans v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2025] NZACC 75 (8 May 2025) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...the position, excused Ms Edmonds from attending and directed the matter would be determined on the papers. Introduction [5] Mr Evans had a dental implant which he says caused gingival overgrowth and resulted in the movement of two teeth. He claims this is a treatment injury. [6] Considering the statutory criteria for a treatment injury, the issue I must determine is whether the dental implant caused the gingival overgrowth and movement. Factual background [7] The parties provi...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 98 Ovation NZ Ltd v The NZ Meat Workers and Related Trades Union [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...1 Airways Corp of New Zealand Ltd v Postles [2002] 1 ERNZ 71 (CA). 2 Ovation New Zealand Ltd v The New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc [2018] NZEmpC 92. and that compliance of those requests would be given by 10 August 2018. I reserved leave for the parties to apply promptly with regard to any disclosure issues. [7] Mutual informal disclosure then took place. Counsel for the plaintiffs sought disclosure by email sent on

3. BO v XTT [2012] NZIACDT 31 (28 June 2012) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...professional duties as a licensed immigration adviser. [2] The professional engagement arose when Mr BO needed a variation to his work permit, as he wanted to work for a new employer. [3] He says Mr XTT met with him briefly, and gave him a blank form to sign. Mr XTT failed to tell him that he could not take up work with a new employer until Immigration New Zealand processed the application. Mr XTT delayed filing the application, and did not keep in touch with him. [4] Mr BO took...

4. February Legal Aid News [pdf, 525 KB]

   ...employer’s name or type of benefit)  The application must include whether the customer has control of a trust and/or interest in property (please include property address and market value) If you have any questions in relation to any of this information please do not hesitate to contact the legal aid office 0800 2 LEGAL AID. Repayment of legal aid for domestic violence proceedings An applicant for a protection order in domestic violence proceedings is exempt from the requirem...

5. EL v FO [2022] NZDT 8 (28 April 2022) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...the above issues, as I have found the cake was iced in accordance with instructions, and as EL took possession of the cake, I find no refund is justified. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 28 April 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

6. Litchfield & Wells [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The submission from Marie Litchfield and Graham Wells in response to the assessor’s report. The submission from Alan Light. The assessor’s report dated 19 November 2009. The letter from Laura Tait of the...

7. Family Legal Advice Service operational policy version 1.4 [pdf, 479 KB]

   ...Policy for providing early legal advice for disputes under the Care of Children Act 2004 Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.4 August 2016 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully exclude...

8. [2018] NZSSAA 33 (18 July 2018) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...question is now before the Authority pursuant to the consent order of the High Court dated 5 May 2016. That order followed a joint memorandum filed by the parties, and the joint memorandum is referred to in the order. This order of the High Court formulated the issues for the Authority in the following way: 46.2 The matter is remitted to the Authority under High Court Rule 21.14(b) and (d) for reconsideration of the question of law in accordance with Williams J’s decision outlined...

9. KD v N Ltd & HX [2023] NZDT 424 (3 July 2023) [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...to the [Address 1] premises (which he says was a high risk flooding area) and as a result of that negligence his bike got water damaged as a result of the 27 January floods. 19. In evidence, KD provided a [Address 1] Network Modelling System Performance Report dated March 2008 which was prepared for (the then) [Suburb] City Council (2008 Report). It says (in relation to the [Address 1] Business District) that this is one of the largest areas of flooding as a result of its flat topogr...

10. BS v KC & DC [2024] NZDT 489 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 243 KB]

    ...5. The parties have each raised issues about the notices served by the other in this claim. 6. KC and DC say that the notices served by BS on 5 and 12 December 2023 were not valid. They say the first valid notice (which included all of the information required by the FA) was received by them on 14 December 2023. They say that the 21 day period for serving a cross notice expired on 4 January 2024, but that BS filed this claim on 3 January 2024. They suggest this means the claim is in...