Search Results

1. J Ltd v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 170 (17 April 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...shared parking area with no security or protection, this is a full defence to U Ltd not taking reasonable care with the vehicle. Therefore, the claim is dismissed. Referee: C Price Date: 17 April 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

2. AJ v ZQ Ltd [2014] NZDT 628 (18 July 2014) [pdf, 26 KB]

   ...exclusion. [5] As part of AJ’s contract of insurance with ZQ Ltd, there is a term that states that ‘pre- existing conditions’ are excluded from cover. The definition of ‘pre-existing condition’ is included in the findings below. [6] AJ claims that ZQ Ltd’ interpretation of its terms and conditions is wrong in this situation and that they are therefore in breach of their contract with him to provide cover. He claims $1535.00, being the costs related to testing for and tr...

3. Nuku v Police (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...K Nuku on his own behalf Ms K Laurenson and Mr G Taylor for defendant DATE OF HEARING: On the papers DATE OF DECISION: 19 January 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM1 BACKGROUND [1] On 9 June 2016, Mr Nuku made a request under the Privacy Act 1993 (Privacy Act) to the Police for access to a number of Crown and defence exhibits. Police provided some material but withheld other information under s 29 of the Privacy Act, including information relating to o...

4. HO & KT v QN Ltd [2021] NZDT 1708 (21 December 2021) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...was evicted on 15 July 2021. 5. HO and KT contend that QN Ltd breached its contractual obligations to them by failing to follow up properly with the tenant, failing to ensure the tenant had received the notice and failing to keep them properly informed about the lack of response from the tenant upon attempts at contact. 6. They claim $23,355.50, being $14,325.75 late settlement penalty paid to their purchaser, Council rates of $269.12, loan repayment from 4 June to 23 July of $207...

5. DX v STX & SCX [2023] NZDT 493 (2 October 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...headstone for her mother. She began making payments towards the second headstone, which was fully paid by 2022. 7. In December 2021, ON Ltd sold the business to SCX, STX’s niece. SCX operated the business as a sole trader. 8. DX was informed of the change of ownership, and she dealt with SCX after December 2021. 9. DX made several requests to view the completed headstones but was not given that opportunity. 10. DX did not see the headstones until 3 June 2023, the day bef...

6. [2015] NZEmpC 130 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...The plaintiff filed a document entitled “Application Regarding Matters of Law” on 10 February. The document set out the reasons why Miss Scarborough considered that the Court should refer the matter back to the Authority; advised that she had requested an investigation into her dismissal by the Ministry of Social Development; contended that the Authority member had not carried out a thorough investigation and did not have material evidence to support her determination; and that...

7. Sheeran v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2024] NZACC 130 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ............................................................................................................................... [3] Facts ............................................................................................................................ [4] The Claim ............................................................................................................ [5] Lump Sum Application .........................................................................................

8. Y v Xue [2015] NZIACDT 6 (13 February 2015) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar Between S Y and R Y Complainants AND Jia (Christina) Xue Adviser No information identifying the complainants to be published DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Mr A Dumbleton, lawyer, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Auckland Complainants: Mr A Tsang, Prestige Lawyers, Auckland...

9. Hartley v Balemi [pdf, 401 KB]

   ...plaster cladding has resulted in rot and damage to internal linings”. They were claiming for the estimated costs of repairs to remedy the problems at a figure of $300,000.00. 4.2 As a part of the preparations for the hearing, the Owners were requested to provide more details and particulars about their claims. This was done before the respondents were required to file their Responses pursuant to section 28 of the WHRS Act. The Owners identified a list of the problems with the...

10. BU v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 18 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...rehearing should be ordered in this instance. Therefore, B Ltd’s application for a rehearing is refused, and referee Jadurum’s order stands. Referee: C D Boys Date: 30 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...