Search Results

1. ADC v ZWY [2009] NZDT 199 (31 July 2009) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...garments as an outworker for ADC’s clothing manufacturing and retail business. On 5 June 2009, ADC collected ZWY’s work from her home and paid ZWY’s invoice for the work totalling $178.00. On 9 June 2009, ADC left a phone message for ZWY informing her that she was stopping the payment because the garments she had sewn were not of the required standard and that she would no longer be using ZWY for any further work. [2] ZWY is now claiming payment of her invoice and ADC is...

2. [2022] NZACC 180 — Coldrick v ACC (20 September 2022) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the ruling of a Reviewer dated 14 April 2022. The Reviewer issued a procedural ruling in relation to Fulton Hogan’s decision dated 10 November 2021 declining Mr’s Coldrick’s request for physiotherapy. Background [2] On 25 February 2020, Mr Coldrick twisted his right knee while standing on a boulder at work. His GP, Dr McGuire, lodged a claim for cover for a sprain of the right knee/leg. On 27 March 2020, th...

3. Shihaku v Mizoguchi [2017] NZIACDT 7 (19 June 2017) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...some tension between them. The principles are: [5.1] The Tribunal may regulate its procedures as it thinks fit. [5.2] Matters or complaints must be heard on the papers. [5.3] Despite the requirement to hear matters on the papers, the Tribunal may request further information from any person or request that any person appear before the Tribunal to make a statement or an explanation. [6] In some cases, the power to require persons to attend before the Tribunal has been necessary bec...

4. Nottingham v Accident Compensation Corporation (Social Rehabilitation) [2022] NZACC 212 [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...Respondent Hearing: 14 November 2022 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikirioa Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented J Sumner for the respondent Judgment: 18 November 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Alleged delay and requested funding for social rehabilitation ss 134(1), 79 and 84, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 26 July 2021. The Reviewer dismissed Mr Nottingham’s revie...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - Part 5 Te Urewera [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...the Crown over ownership of lakes ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 20 .4 .2 What was the Crown’s response to the Maori claims for legal ownership of the lake ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 20 .4 .3 What w...

6. Holt & Ors as Trustees of the Kahala Trust v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 15 [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...saddle flashings. Therefore they considered the membrane installer was required to ensure weathertightness by using upstands at various junctions. The junctions between the waterproofing membrane and the block work were in their opinion poorly formed and this resulted in water Page | 6 infiltrating deck areas at the junction of the membrane and column upstand. [13] Both Mr Nevill and Mr Maiden also agreed that the membrane installer had not complied with the require...

7. S Ltd v NG [2023] NZDT 669 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...now seeks a refund of the $1,837.35 paid to her. 2. S Ltd’s claim was originally filed against NG, but N Ltd was joined as second respondent at the previous hearing since its name was used on the invoices. However, N Ltd’s representative ND informed the Tribunal and confirmed in the hearing that NG has no connection with that company and is unknown to ND. NG was the director of a company named NGD Ltd that was removed from the Companies Register in 2021. The correct respondent is the...

8. Litchfield & Wells [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The submission from Marie Litchfield and Graham Wells in response to the assessor’s report. The submission from Alan Light. The assessor’s report dated 19 November 2009. The letter from Laura Tait of the...

9. 2017 NZSSAA 020 (5 May 2017) [pdf, 330 KB]

   ...vulnerable. c. A certificate of title showed that the Appellant and OCI were joint owners of a home, and were both noted as mortgagors. d. Documents relating to Police checks for the Appellant and OCI indicated that they had been identified on forms as “partners”. e. Various hospital2 documents showed the Appellant and OCI as being “partners” in the records. Other medical records also showed that the Appellant and OCI were identified as partners. f. ANI said that informa...

10. Lt and QT v OT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1430 (16 March 2021) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...approved this on 28 August as complying with its swimming pool safety requirements. [4] Mr T then concreted posts in place across the area where the garage had been removed. His intention was to continue constructing fencing so that a new and uniform fence would run along the entire length between the two properties. He did his work along the line where the previous fence had been, in accordance with the existing survey pegs that were there. Mr R then came and cut these posts off at gro...