Search Results

1. QA v FI & II [2024] NZDT 231 (6 March 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...need to consider the question regarding whether $30,000.00 is a reasonable amount of compensation. 14. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 6 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

2. TT v JN [2024] NZDT 344 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...have failed to prove that it is more likely than not that JN was driving without reasonable care and skill. 10. The claim by TT and J Ltd is therefore dismissed. Referee: K L Hoult Date: 15 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. TI v UB [2025] NZDT 47 (31 March 2025) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...Tribunal unless exceptional circumstances apply which do not apply on the facts of this case. No award is therefore made to reimburse TI for that cost. K Cowie Disputes Tribunal Referee 31 March 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. ID v G Ltd & Ors [2025] NZDT 160 (9 May 2025) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...on or before 30 May 2025. 2. R Ltd is to pay U Ltd $15,000.00 on or before 30 May 2025. Reasons 1. ID engaged G Ltd to paint the roof, fascia and garage door of her home. She also engaged F Ltd to supply and install a scaffold working platform and edge protection, for the painters. On 7 December 2022 a working platform and edge protection was installed by F Ltd. Between 8 and 12 December 2022 the painting work was completed by G Ltd. On 16 December 2022, the scaffold working pla...

5. LCRO 236/2017 HC and CI v PR (10 December 2019) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...High Court. [7] This decision necessarily proceeds on the basis of the materials that were before the Committee, and a determination of unsatisfactory conduct that cannot be overturned by this Office on review, whatever alternate view might be formed as to the propriety of the unsatisfactory conduct determination or the complainants’ veracity. [8] For an order to be made pursuant to s 156(1)(d) of the Act, there must be evidence that supports the complainants’ claim to compens...

6. BD v DS Ltd [2020] NZDT 1504 (14 October 2020) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...does not necessarily mean they had something to hide. There could be other reasons. Conclusion 25. For the reasons above, DS’s claim is dismissed. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 14 October 2020 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. CT & ID v S Ltd [2022] NZDT 7 (2 March 2022) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 7 APPLICANT CT APPLICANT ID RESPONDENT S Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 11 March 2021 CT and ID (the applicants) engaged S Limited (SL) to perform a pre- purchase inspection report on [address] (the property). 2. Some months after purchasing the property, the applicants became aware of issues with the windows and water ingress. 3. The applicants are claiming $9,328.90, being...

8. EC v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 186 (13 June 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...provide to their customers. They said however that every issue that EC encountered was dealt with and resolved by U Ltd, and that overall, even taken together, they considered that the service provided was reasonable. 13. I have taken all of the information provided by both parties into account and I am unable to make a finding that U Ltd’s service was not provided with reasonable care and skill in this case. 14. I can see that there were a number of issues that EC encountered in...

9. BE v ZI Ltd [2022] NZDT 265 (17 December 2022) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...the total amount of $18,400.00. Conclusion 19. For these reasons ZI Ltd is to pay BE the sum of $18,400.00 including GST by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 17 December 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. FQ v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 248 (24 November 2022) [pdf, 103 KB]

    ...satisfied that loss was reasonably foreseeable. I find FQ is entitled to be paid by T Ltd $4,000.00 for this loss. Referee: B Curtis Date: 24 November 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...