Search Results

1. TT Ltd v TG Trust [2022] NZDT 136 (17 August 2022) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...from TB of [Consent Company] dated 1 March 2017 (“the Fire Report”) which recorded that a Type 2 fire alarm system needed to be installed, and specified what emergency lighting was to be installed at the Property. The Fire Report stated that it formed part of the Building Consent application (page 1 of the Fire Report) and the Fire Report notes that the Building Act 2004 applied to the proposed work which involved a change to the use of the building. The Applicant installed a Type 2 fi...

2. J Ltd v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 170 (17 April 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...shared parking area with no security or protection, this is a full defence to U Ltd not taking reasonable care with the vehicle. Therefore, the claim is dismissed. Referee: C Price Date: 17 April 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

3. [2025] NZEmpC 76 Vegepod NZ Ltd v Lowe [pdf, 291 KB]

   ...Harris that such costs could not be imposed on Vegepod NZ Ltd under the Shareholder and Distribution Agreements dated May 2019. Mrs and Mr Lowe were then advised that “management fees”, rather than costs, would be imposed. Mrs and Mr Lowe requested that Matthew Harris and the chief financial officer of the Vegepod group, Mr Triesman, engage an expert on transfer pricing. That request appears to have been declined. [27] In the event, Mrs and Mr Lowe raised a shareholder dispu...

4. [2017] NZEmpC 71 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...Stormont says, and I accept, that Mr Goldie reached an agreement with her as to revenue ($473,000) and direct costs ($166,000). Applying these figures would lead to a gross profit of $307,000, 20 per cent of which equals $61,400 (gross). This forms the basis of the claim for a bonus of $61,400. Mr Forrest agreed in evidence that he had never been asked to re-do his calculations to reflect the figures agreed between Ms Stormont and Mr Goldie. [22] On 15 January 2014 Mr Goldie...

5. HO & KT v QN Ltd [2021] NZDT 1708 (21 December 2021) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...was evicted on 15 July 2021. 5. HO and KT contend that QN Ltd breached its contractual obligations to them by failing to follow up properly with the tenant, failing to ensure the tenant had received the notice and failing to keep them properly informed about the lack of response from the tenant upon attempts at contact. 6. They claim $23,355.50, being $14,325.75 late settlement penalty paid to their purchaser, Council rates of $269.12, loan repayment from 4 June to 23 July of $207...

6. DX v STX & SCX [2023] NZDT 493 (2 October 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...headstone for her mother. She began making payments towards the second headstone, which was fully paid by 2022. 7. In December 2021, ON Ltd sold the business to SCX, STX’s niece. SCX operated the business as a sole trader. 8. DX was informed of the change of ownership, and she dealt with SCX after December 2021. 9. DX made several requests to view the completed headstones but was not given that opportunity. 10. DX did not see the headstones until 3 June 2023, the day bef...

7. Sheeran v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2024] NZACC 130 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ............................................................................................................................... [3] Facts ............................................................................................................................ [4] The Claim ............................................................................................................ [5] Lump Sum Application .........................................................................................

8. BU v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 18 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...rehearing should be ordered in this instance. Therefore, B Ltd’s application for a rehearing is refused, and referee Jadurum’s order stands. Referee: C D Boys Date: 30 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

9. [2015] NZEmpC 130 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...The plaintiff filed a document entitled “Application Regarding Matters of Law” on 10 February. The document set out the reasons why Miss Scarborough considered that the Court should refer the matter back to the Authority; advised that she had requested an investigation into her dismissal by the Ministry of Social Development; contended that the Authority member had not carried out a thorough investigation and did not have material evidence to support her determination; and that...

10. ABI v ZYU Ltd (in liquidation) [2010] NZDT 82 (30 September 2010) [pdf, 10 KB]

    ...AND ZYU Ltd (in liquidation) RESPONDENT Date of Order: 20 September 2010 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim against ZYU Ltd (in liquidation) is dismissed. [1] The hearing on 20 September 2010 was attended by ABI and KL, who was a director of ZYU Ltd (in liquidation). [2] ABI claimed a refund of the price for a couch purchased from ZYU...