Search Results

1. Sheeran v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2024] NZACC 130 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ............................................................................................................................... [3] Facts ............................................................................................................................ [4] The Claim ............................................................................................................ [5] Lump Sum Application .........................................................................................

2. BU v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 18 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...rehearing should be ordered in this instance. Therefore, B Ltd’s application for a rehearing is refused, and referee Jadurum’s order stands. Referee: C D Boys Date: 30 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. ABI v ZYU Ltd (in liquidation) [2010] NZDT 82 (30 September 2010) [pdf, 10 KB]

   ...AND ZYU Ltd (in liquidation) RESPONDENT Date of Order: 20 September 2010 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim against ZYU Ltd (in liquidation) is dismissed. [1] The hearing on 20 September 2010 was attended by ABI and KL, who was a director of ZYU Ltd (in liquidation). [2] ABI claimed a refund of the price for a couch purchased from ZYU...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 130 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...The plaintiff filed a document entitled “Application Regarding Matters of Law” on 10 February. The document set out the reasons why Miss Scarborough considered that the Court should refer the matter back to the Authority; advised that she had requested an investigation into her dismissal by the Ministry of Social Development; contended that the Authority member had not carried out a thorough investigation and did not have material evidence to support her determination; and that...

5. Y v Xue [2015] NZIACDT 6 (13 February 2015) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar Between S Y and R Y Complainants AND Jia (Christina) Xue Adviser No information identifying the complainants to be published DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Mr A Dumbleton, lawyer, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Auckland Complainants: Mr A Tsang, Prestige Lawyers, Auckland...

6. C Ltd v KQ [2022] NZDT 1 (14 March 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...a house she was selling. Unfortunately goods supplied for the purpose were stolen during the staging. C LTD lodged a claim with their insurer. The insurance payment to C LTD was $15,941.92 after the deduction of the $2,500.00 excess. C LTD requested KQ to pay the excess, but she declined. The claim is for the $2,500.00 excess to be paid by KQ. 2. C LTD provided a quote for the staging contract and is relying on the ‘Terms’ supplied with that quote. The last term states...

7. TN v PO Ltd [2023] NZDT 570 (16 November 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...on the companies’ genuine website alerting users to the fraudulent use of the company names on [social media] by person/s unknown. 3. The only evidence about who TN might actually have been dealing with through [online marketplace] is in the form of a photograph sent to TN by the seller, of a man holding his photo ID drivers’ license next to his face. The man on the drivers’ license and the man in the photograph sent with the license appear to be the same person, but of course it...

8. BD v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 350 (7 March 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...During the course of some of the work, BD acknowledged he was working at home, and he would have observed the expansive nature of the work. 14. HB says he occasionally discussed with the applicant about what was happening, and at some point informed the applicant that he would likely have a legal case against the previous owner for failing to disclose the broken septic system when the house was sold. 15. HB says as the work progressed and in discussions with the applicant, he also r...

9. LCRO 207/2015 CA v BE (21 August 2018) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...that are first raised at the review stage of the proceedings. The Parties’ Arguments [34] Mr ZK identified Mrs CA’s main concern, (described by him as her “highest point of objection”) as concern that Mr BE had refused to comply with request to ensure that his client’s complaints were kept confidential. As this argument was advanced, it appeared to be the case that it was being suggested that Mr BE had given indication of his intention to interview potential witnesses...

10. MSC v Scholes [2013] NZIACDT 71 (25 November 2013) [pdf, 167 KB]

    ...appropriate. In addition, she failed to initiate the professional engagement and document her instructions in accordance with the Code of Conduct. [5] The Tribunal gave the parties the opportunity to address the Tribunal in relation to sanctions. It also requested that the Registrar provide information regarding the cost of investigating the complaint. [6] In the course of responding, both parties revisited factual matters. [7] This present decision addresses two issues: [7.1] The p...