Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 77 Kaukau t/a Sew & Sew v Hiri-Gualeni [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...and penalties to the Crown of $2,000.2 [3] In her de novo challenge Ms Kaukau claims that Ms Hiri-Gualeni was not an employee of hers but a contractor. She also says that the amount awarded for lost remuneration was overstated. The Court requested a Good Faith Report from the Authority [4] In the course of the Authority’s determination, the Authority recorded that Ms Kaukau did not participate in the Authority’s investigation: (a) she failed to provide employment recor...

2. FB Ltd v NG & BJ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1486 (6 April 2021) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...FO is reasonable in the circumstances given its explanations for that approach. In that regard I find for FO and therefore award its damages claim in full. Referee: S. P. Kane. Date: 6 April 2021. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. LX v HO Limited [2019] NZDT 1428 (19 June 2019) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...hearing that GST inclusive figures would apply, regardless of whether an invoice would be presented. The award has therefore been calculated on that basis. Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 19 June 2019 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to...

4. NW v B Ltd [2022] NZDT 145 (12 September 2022) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...the above, the matter of damages in point 6(b) above does not need to be considered and the claim is dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: DTR Goddard Date: 12 September 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. TN v QS [2022] NZDT 92 (1 September 2022) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...invoices. Had I found that TN had proven that QS breached his duty of care, TN would have needed to establish the actual loss she suffered. Referee: K Cowie DTR Date: 1 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

6. EX v HC [2023] NZDT 631 (29 November 2023) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 631 APPLICANT EX RESPONDENT HC The Tribunal orders: HC must pay EX $1,000.00 by 4pm on 20 December 2023. Reasons: 1. EX wanted to purchase a car from HC that was being sold via [online] platform. As that car was about to be sold, HC offered EX another car which was the same make and model which he had decided to sell but not yet listed on [online platform]. After conversations between the parties, EX paid a deposit of $1,000.00...

7. MJ v OM Ltd [2023] NZDT 52 (21 February 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...foreseeable consequential losses. She provided quotations in support of these costs. I therefore find that the total sum payable by OM Ltd is $6,162.46. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 21 February 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

8. NT v SQ [2023] NZDT 498 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...purchase, despite a lot of heavy rainfall in the interim. 13. I therefore conclude that the buyer is entitled to recover $3,366.66 in damages from the seller. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 31 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

9. LB & SH v BB and others [2023] NZDT 7 (2 March 2023) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...jetski. The balance of the [Finance Company] debt would be recovered by [Finance Company] from BB. BB agreed to this arrangement. 9. Although finance was in his name, BB has disputed he was the owner of the jetski. BB stated in evidence that his former partner, TB, wanted the jetski, however as he had a better credit rating, it was put in his name. BB and TB separated in April 2021 and therefore decided to sell the jetski. 10. TB stated in evidence that the jetski belonged to both he...

10. MT v BX [2024] NZDT 85 (16 January 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...numerous requirements that the lender must comply with, including disclosure to the borrower of specified matters, and a failure to comply renders the loan contract unenforceable. 6. At first glance it appears that the loan is made on some kind of a formal or commercial basis. The charging of a fee described as “convenience and rapid service fee” makes that plain, because CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 one might ask, why is that fee being charged if it is a one-off l...