Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 26 Benge and others v Air New Zealand [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...Judgment: 29 March 2011 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] This judgment deals with the defendant‟s application for orders requiring the plaintiffs to give further and better particulars of their amended statement of claim of 5 November 2010. The hearing to determine these opposed applications is the culmination of a series of attempts to establish the pleadings before this litigation can go to trial. Despite a lengthy conference with counsel in Chamber...

2. RS v NC LCRO 70/2011 (17 April 2013) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...of letters (on the Standards Committee file) from the Waitangi Tribunal between August 2008 and June 2010 (written predominantly to Mr AS) reflected the nature of enquires that had been made by Mr AS and/or the Applicant. [2] The Tribunal’s request for more information in relation to their claim led the whānau to approach the Practitioner in around December 2008. The Practitioner advised from the outset that there were difficulties with the claim because the [Iwi X] settlement...

3. Fisher v Foster (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...alleged breach of Principle 6. It did however itemise nine requests for personal information allegedly made, in date order between 3 August 2010 and 30 October 2014. On 17 May 2017, Ms Fisher filed a four-page document entitled “Personal Information Requested but not Received”. This document is essentially a companion to the third claim and is discussed in detail later in this decision. [12] In a memorandum of reply dated 19 May 2017, Dr Foster submitted Ms Fisher had failed to co...

4. July 2016 Criminal Fee Schedules [pdf, 684 KB]

   ...submission. @ 2 Expert witness/reports - Do not include non-expert reports (eg probation reports) or oral reports. @ 3 Section 38 Forensic reports – two s38 reports are required by legislation. The Section 38 Forensic reports fee can be claimed for each of those reports. An Amendment to Grant is required for claims for any subsequent s38 reports. @ 4 Written sentencing submission - if the client accepts the Sentencing Indication, a Written Sentencing Submission is not...

5. Pillay v New Zealand Transport Agency [2021] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...NZTA has interfered with his privacy. [3] NZTA disputes that there has been any interference with Mr Pillay’s privacy and claims immunity in respect of both the disclosures. BACKGROUND [4] In November 2014 Mr Pillay imported the car and requested advice and repair from Mr Barlass, a NZTA accredited repair certifier. Mr Barlass worked with Bute Collision Repairs to have the repairs done for Mr Pillay. The car was then presented to VTNZ for compliance certification in accordance...

6. DT-guide-to-completing-the-application-form-.pdf [pdf, 164 KB]

   Using this guide This guide will provide you with information that will assist you to complete the application form as well as providing some of the important reasons why this information is needed. There are a range of reasons why the information being requested on the application form is necessary. By providing all the information it will ensure your application proceeds without delay and both parties are given equal opportunity to produce evidence in relation to the di...

7. Criminal fixed fee schedules 2017 [pdf, 883 KB]

   ...fixed fee schedules are generic and relate to tasks that may need to be undertaken for progression of the case. Not all tasks will need to be repeated at each stage of the case. Legend * Repeatables - this is a repeatable activity and can be claimed per occurrence of this activity. This includes for all hearings/appearances that are stood down or adjourned, or which need to be rescheduled because the client fails to appear. The fee that can be claimed relates to the hearing time f...

8. Criminal Fixed Fee schedules 2017 [pdf, 737 KB]

   ...fixed fee schedules are generic and relate to tasks that may need to be undertaken for progression of the case. Not all tasks will need to be repeated at each stage of the case. Legend * Repeatables - this is a repeatable activity and can be claimed per occurrence of this activity. This includes for all hearings/appearances that are stood down or adjourned, or which need to be rescheduled because the client fails to appear. The fee that can be claimed relates to the hearing time f...

9. Willing v New Zealand Police (Strike-Out Application) [2020] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 482 KB]

   ...28 May 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT PART OF STATEMENT OF CLAIM1 [1] Benjamin Willing unsuccessfully applied to become a Police recruit in 2011. He sought a review of the recruitment decision and made an information privacy request at the same time. The New Zealand Police (the Police) were late in responding to the request. Mr Willing complained about the delay and other matters to the Privacy Commissioner in 2012. He then made a further information privacy reque...

10. DT form 1 example - claim form where a party is a sole trader [pdf, 884 KB]

    For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals Disputes Tribunal Page 1 For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals DT 07/11 - 1 Form 1: Claims Form What is this form for? Use this form to make a claim to the Tribunal. 1. Fill in all sections below. 2. Print in caPiTal leTTers. 3. check before submitting this form, that you have answered all questions, it is signed and dated, and the filing fee is included. Note: This form will be returned to you...