Search Results

1. XX v KN [2023] NZDT 45 (3 February 2023).pdf [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...would provide a quote before he undertook the work? (b) If not, Is XX entitled to payment of his invoice? Was it agreed that XX would provide a quote before he undertook the work? 3. KN said he always asks for a quote before work is performed on his behalf. He provided several quotes he had obtained as evidence in support of his usual practise. The parties agree that this was the first time that KN had engaged XX’s services. KN left the aluminium material and a cutting tool...

2. B Ltd v KY [2024] NZDT 781 (22 October 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...overall credit of $79.90, although KY chose not to counterclaim this sum. In conclusion KY is not liable to pay B Ltd’s invoice for the extra labour. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 22 October 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. [2007] NZEmpC AC 8B/07 Blaker v B & D Doors (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...the material to the scrap dealer and then showed me the cash that he had received. Julian would not tell me who the other employee was until I said we know Henry Henry put the material in the trailer. Julian then confirmed it was Henry who requested Julian to take the material and also his intention was to give Henry the cash. I asked Julian if we could discuss this with Henry at 11:30 on Thursday morning which was acceptable he replied. Wednesday 7 December approx 2:45pm...

4. Sheeran v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2024] NZACC 130 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ............................................................................................................................... [3] Facts ............................................................................................................................ [4] The Claim ............................................................................................................ [5] Lump Sum Application .........................................................................................

5. Y v Xue [2015] NZIACDT 6 (13 February 2015) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar Between S Y and R Y Complainants AND Jia (Christina) Xue Adviser No information identifying the complainants to be published DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Mr A Dumbleton, lawyer, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Auckland Complainants: Mr A Tsang, Prestige Lawyers, Auckland...

6. LCRO 207/2015 CA v BE (21 August 2018) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...that are first raised at the review stage of the proceedings. The Parties’ Arguments [34] Mr ZK identified Mrs CA’s main concern, (described by him as her “highest point of objection”) as concern that Mr BE had refused to comply with request to ensure that his client’s complaints were kept confidential. As this argument was advanced, it appeared to be the case that it was being suggested that Mr BE had given indication of his intention to interview potential witnesses...

7. Clark v Trustees of Poukawa 9G and others trust (2011) 6 Takitimu MB 285 (6 TKT 285) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...expenses and copies of legal and accounting advice. The trustees did not provide this information. [47] The general courts have long held that a trustee is not generally obliged to volunteer documents to beneficiaries. However, if a beneficiary requests it, the trustee, in most cases, must provide trust documents to the beneficiary and an accounting in respect of it. 14 [48] The leading New Zealand authority on what constitutes „trust documents‟ is Manukau City Council v...

8. HO & KT v QN Ltd [2021] NZDT 1708 (21 December 2021) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...was evicted on 15 July 2021. 5. HO and KT contend that QN Ltd breached its contractual obligations to them by failing to follow up properly with the tenant, failing to ensure the tenant had received the notice and failing to keep them properly informed about the lack of response from the tenant upon attempts at contact. 6. They claim $23,355.50, being $14,325.75 late settlement penalty paid to their purchaser, Council rates of $269.12, loan repayment from 4 June to 23 July of $207...

9. DX v STX & SCX [2023] NZDT 493 (2 October 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...headstone for her mother. She began making payments towards the second headstone, which was fully paid by 2022. 7. In December 2021, ON Ltd sold the business to SCX, STX’s niece. SCX operated the business as a sole trader. 8. DX was informed of the change of ownership, and she dealt with SCX after December 2021. 9. DX made several requests to view the completed headstones but was not given that opportunity. 10. DX did not see the headstones until 3 June 2023, the day bef...

10. Waitangi Tribunal theme G - Public works takings of Māori land [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...claim 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This report was commissioned to provide an overview of Crown legal and administrative policy in compulsorily taking Maori land for public works purposes from 1840 to 1981. The intention is to provide background information, in order to assist in the development of Crown policy in settling Treaty claims arising from public works takings. Where necessary, areas requiring further research are also highlighted. Due to time constraints, this report is only a prel...