Search Results

1. AS v EI Ltd [2023] NZDT 2 (24 January 2023) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...I find that EI Ltd is liable to pay to AS a refund for the plant and the consequential loss of the cost she paid for shipping, a total of $44.00 claimed. 7. AS also wished to claim the $45.00 filing fee, stating that the Tribunal’s online information said that would be ordered to be paid by the other party if she was successful. I have invited her to email through a copy of that page, because it will need to be corrected if she has indeed read that in our pre-hearing information. Se...

2. EI v AI JBH Ltd [2020] NZDT 1542 (15 January 2020) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...that he reasonably believed could have seriously injured or even killed him. Therefore he is not liable to pay compensation for the damage to EI’s car. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 15 January 2020 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

3. TC v DG [2023] NZDT 25 (17 March 2023) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...quality or durability. Legally that risk is hers and cannot be shifted back to DG, so the claim must be dismissed. Referee: E Paton-Simpson CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Date: 17 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

4. EN v ML [2022] NZDT 257 (19 December 2022) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...for EN to prove his claim it must be shown that his version is more likely than ML’s. Because he has not the claim cannot succeed and must be dismissed. Referee: P McKinstry Date: 19 December 2022 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. TC v DG [2023] NZDT 25 (17 March 2023) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...the risk that it might not be of good quality or durability. Legally that risk is hers and cannot be shifted back to DG, so the claim must be dismissed. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 17 March 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

6. T Ltd v EL [2023] NZDT 472 (9 August 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...requirements of the Property Law Act 2007 because it was not signed by EL and is unenforceable. 7. For this reason, the claim must be dismissed. Referee: Verdun Tawhara Date: 9th day of August 2023. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

7. DA v YB [2023] NZDT 685 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...$705.00 to DA on or before 31 January 2024; and Once the payment is made, DA is to make the scooter available for collection by YB within four weeks of payment. Reasons 1. The applicant purchased a new scooter from the respondent via [online platform] at a cost of $680.00 plus $25.00 shipping. The respondent is in trade – when the dispute arose, [online platform] provided the seller’s name as YB trading as XX. 2. The scooter did not have the charging range advertised but wh...

8. DG & J Ltd v BM [2024] NZDT 327 (23 April 2024) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...by way of a quote, insurance assessment and invoices. J Ltd has paid fully for repairs. BM is to make payment to J Ltd. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: J.F. Tunnicliffe Date: 23 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 140 The Trustees of the Spruce Grove Trust v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...exchange process, they reduced the spatial extent of the residential activity area sought in the MRZ (as shown on the structure plan appended to Mr Milne’s rebuttal evidence). They point out that, ultimately, aspects of Mr Milne’s recommendations formed part of the LCU description in PDP Sch 24.8 relating to the location of any proposed development on the south side of the roche moutonnée to ensure the legibility of the landform would be maintained. [22] The appellants submi...

10. [2021] NZACC 183 – Butler v ACC (16 November 2021) [pdf, 340 KB]

    ...have a covered claim for cervical injury. [12] He therefore has a concern that this attitude on the part of ACC has tainted subsequent medical reports. [13] He refers to a report from surgeon Andrew Oakley, dated 6 January 2015. At the request of ACC’s case manager, Mr Oakley met with the appellant and performed a medical case review. [14] This review report includes the following: He dates the onset of his neck problems to a motor vehicle accident in 1996. He was...