Search Results

1. TI v N Ltd [2019] NZDT 1438 (30 September 2019) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...agrees to assume all the risk, for any condition or problems that may be concealed at the time of the inspection. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 6 Nothing will be dismantled during the inspection, and there will be no destructive testing performed. Appliances and spa/pool equipment special cycles or features are not inspected; none of the appliances or equipment will be dismantled, and no determination of their efficiency will be made. The client understands that the house...

2. LCRO 83/2025 NA v CB and MG (15 September 2025) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...I do not doubt your interpretations and conclusions, I do not feel they reflect natural justice. It is our duty as citizens to ensure that justice prevails and if it does not changes must be made for the future. [27] The applicant proceeded to request the second respondent’s permission to include the latter’s letter with the correspondence he intended sending to the Minister of Justice, the Chief Justice and the President of the Law Society. The second respondent advised that the...

3. Estate of Moloney v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 203 [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...the collection is 3 cm. A clear dressing was placed over the marking to protect it during transit to the ward. [28] On 24 January 2021, Mrs Moloney died from metastatic colorectal cancer. [29] On 9 February 2022, an advice of accidental death claim form ACC21 was submitted to the Corporation. This included a request for financial assistance with a funeral grant and outlined the delay with the MRI scan as the MRI scan request was supposed to be in the six-week category but by mi...

4. Lee v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2023] NZACC 176 [pdf, 352 KB]

   ...Accident Compensation Act 2001. [3] The respondent’s position is that there is insufficient evidence of a causal link between the appellant’s Parkinson’s Disease and a workplace exposure. Background [4] On 30 June 2021, an ACC injury claim form was filed for poisoning due to a chemical substance. The description of injury was: Worked for the Post Office from 1979 to 1986, was regularly exposed to trichloroethane and is concerned that his Parkinson’s Disease was ca...

5. [2009] NZEmpC AC 29/09 Ogilvy NZ Ltd v Whitten [pdf, 26 KB]

   ...to the costs award could also be disposed of on the same papers. [3] The application for leave was supported by an affidavit of Stephanie Cooper, the personal assistant of Chris Patterson, counsel for the applicant. It referred to a request on 3 April 2009 by the respondent through her counsel, Ms Hornsby-Geluk, requesting payment of the Authority’s award of costs totalling, with GST, $4,934.25. Mr Patterson replied on 6 April 2009 saying Ogilvy NZ regarded the award a...

6. [2013] NZEmpC 128 Taiapa v Te Runanga o Turanganui a Kiwa [pdf, 38 KB]

   ...(also excluding GST). [2] The defendant was also successful in the Employment Relations Authority1 resulting in a costs award2 1 [2012] NZERA Auckland 252. in its favour of $4,650 which, despite requests, has not been paid to it, so that the defendant has now commenced proceedings for a compliance order in that forum. 2 [2012] NZERA Auckland 289. [3] The defendant has both established that its costs of legal representatio...

7. BORA Organic Products Bill [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...expression (such as advertising or labelling).2 9. The Bill contains various provisions of a regulatory nature that prima facie limit the right to freedom of expression, such as to: make and keep records, publish statements and provide information requested by the relevant chief executive, organic products officer or any other prescribed person in certain situations. They mostly apply to the operator or recognised entity. These provisions are necessary to ensure efficient and effective...

8. DN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 145 [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...concussion injury and a traumatic amputation of the right finger, for which he received cover. [3] On 22 April 2011, the applicant suffered a physical injury and post-traumatic stress disorder in a sexual assault. [4] On 16 January 2013, the applicant claimed for cover for the physical injury suffered in the assault. On 9 May 2013, the Corporation approved exploratory surgery. The Corporation subsequently granted cover for post-traumatic stress disorder. [5] On 14 November 20...

9. McLenachan v ACC [2013] NZACA 11 [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...decision was issued on 9 March 2011. This re-stated the 5 July 2000 decision under s 53(9) of the 1982 Act, because, it was said, the decision was made to defer the implementation of the reduced rate until 14 September 2000. That decision was not formally conveyed in writing and this prevented Mr McLenachan applying for a review. The decision made in this letter was to implement the rate of reduced compensation from 14 September 2000. The right of review was given under the 2001 Act....

10. JL v P Ltd & SX [2024] NZDT 685 (27 August 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...and that they worked as a team. Furthermore, she says she had emails from both QV and SX using the signature block Company P Limited, and that the invoices had the name Company P. 11. However, on balance I find that by the time the contract was formed in February 2022, Company P was no longer being operated by the company Company P Limited. I say this as I accept the evidence from QV, the Director of Company P Limited supported by the agreement for sale and purchase of a business date...