Search Results

1. IT Ltd v HI Ltd [2023] NZDT 572 (29 November 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...together with $23.56 in penalty interest to date, $628.00 for the statutory demand, and $519.27 in other collection costs. HI Ltd did not pay, and IT Ltd now seeks payment of the invoice with interest and collection costs. The amount stated on the claim form was $5,502.69, but this seems to be an error, being the total of the invoices originally referred to debt collection. 3. The issues to be determined are: a) Is HI Ltd entitled to deduct more in damages for the door? b) Is IT Ltd e...

2. Q Ltd v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 438 (11 July 2023) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...from UE on 9 January 2023 arranging for the two course enrolments. E-mail confirmation of the enrolments was sent to UE's personal e-mail address. 6. On the morning of the courses, being 10 January 2023, UE and MX completed Learner Enrolment Forms which on the second page have space for details about who is paying the bill. 7. Both UE and MX ticked “company account”. UE provided the name “[B Ltd]” and EU provided the name “[B Ltd]” and gave an e-mail address for t...

3. BI v A Ltd [2024] NZDT 833 (19 September 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...evidence for another vehicle behind him being involved and/or causing all of the damage to all vehicles. Even if it were to be accepted that another vehicle hit the rear of his vehicle, it is not known in what order the impacts occurred. QA’s claim form states “Car in front of me made a random abrupt stop for no reason. I lightly tapped his rear bumper – no damage so we agreed to no action.”, and then “Car behind hit my rear end + fled the scene. No ID.” 5. The above statem...

4. B Ltd v QM [2024] NZDT 288 (8 May 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...touch with him to discuss completion of the work. 4. B Ltd then sent QM a letter advising they “had arranged to finish uncompleted projects”. In order to proceed, they asked QM to review the details in the letter and sign as agreed. The information in the letter included the amount payable and the scope of work. QM signed the letter as being accepted. 5. The motorised louvre was duly completed and installed, with an invoice being raised for the balance of the louvre price.

5. BS & CS v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 314 (20 April 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...supplied to a consumer, there is a guarantee that the service will be carried out with reasonable care and skill. CGA s 29 provides that services must be reasonably fit for any purpose the consumer makes known to the supplier before the contract is formed, unless the circumstances show that the consumer does not rely on the supplier's skill or judgment, or it would be unreasonable for the consumer to do so. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 7. I consider that the supplier failed...

6. Guo v CAC304 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 35 [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...without a bid at auction. 2.9 On 11 July 2013 licensee 1 contacted the purchasers to inform them that the property had not sold at auction and was now listed at an asking price of $639,000. 2.10 On 20 July 2013 Barfoots agreed with the vendor’s request to release them from the sole agency agreement and withdraw the property from sale. 2.11 In early August 2013 the property was listed for sale by Blue Fern Realty Limited trading as Harcourts Henderson Heights (Harcourts HH). 2.12...

7. Wernham v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2023] NZACC 022 [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...recommended that an Occupational Physician obtain further exposure details, for example, the frequency of potential exposure to solvent such as toluene, the nature of the exposure, how these substances were handled, removed and stored, and who performed these activities. 9 [22] On 19 September 2021, Dr Walls provided a further report, after undertaking more research and discussing Mr Wernham’s case with colleagues. These included, in particular, Professor Andrea ‘t Mannetj...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 21 Grocott t/a Fluffys Roof Coatings v Parratt [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...plaintiff was represented by Mr Thompson. [2] Following a directions conference held on 17 October 2012, I issued a minute in which I said: [5] As in many cases where the plaintiff in a challenge was the respondent in the Authority, the standard form of pleadings required by the Employment Court Regulations 2000 does not give the Court a clear picture 1 [2012] NZERA Christchurch 127. of the parties’ positions. I therefore dir...

9. Proactive-release-ProactiveofLegalAssistance_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...analysis and undertake consultation. Date of issue: 03 July 2025 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be re leased . Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it. No. D...

10. [2024] NZLVT 062 - Edwards v Minister for Land Information (29 November 2024) [pdf, 3.4 MB]

    Edwards v Minister for Land Information IN THE LAND VALUATION TRIBUNAL AT AUCKLAND I TE TARAIPŪNARA WĀRIU WHENUA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZLVT 062 IN THE MATTER OF a claim for compensation under s 84 of the Public Works Act 1981 BETWEEN B F EDWARDS (ENV-2021-AKL-000045) Claimant AND MINISTER FOR LAND INFORMATION Respondent Tribunal: Judge S M Tepania (Chair) J W Charters (Member Valuer) DA Culav (Member Valuer) Hearing: 12 – 15 June 2023