Search Results

1. UH v KT [2017] NZDT 1500 (12 April 2017) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...more easily done from [Redacted], the builders are authorised to go onto that property during working hours, for the purpose of doing the work set out in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 12 April 2017 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to app...

2. ER Ors v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 580 (15 November 2023) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...2]. This leg of the journey was with [Airline 2] . The family was rebooked on another flight later that day and landed in [City 2] on 11 December 2022. 6. ER explained that in January, they became concerned that they had not received any information from the airline about check-in and when they contacted the airline they were told that their tickets had been cancelled. The family had been marked as “no shows” after they missed their original connection in [Country 2] in Decem...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 110 Cowan v Kidd [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...that he had not worked on a full-time basis and assessed the hours he worked to be approximately half those claimed. The Authority found the appropriate rate that Mr Cowan ought to be paid was the then minimum wage at the time the work was performed. The Authority rejected Mr Cowan’s personal grievance claim for 1 Cowan v Kidd Partnership [2018] NZERA Christchurch 50 (Member Crichton) at [125]. unjustifiable dismissal, bu...

4. [2023] NZEmpC 71 Straayer v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...a mistake in law because the Authority had taken no active part in the judicial review proceeding in this Court.4 He said that a third party was about to file a proceeding in that Court which would have implications for this proceeding. He also requested that a decision on costs be reserved until the appellate issues to which he had referred had been determined. [11] Mr Straayer also submitted that in essence the costs claim was one brought on behalf of the Crown and not WorkSafe...

5. Easton v Mayers [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...additional to that specified by the Council and that the work that Mr Pine carried out had possibly saved parts of the building from further decay. [31] Under examination Mr Frame said that he had no direct knowledge from Mr Pine or the Leovs that formed the basis of those parts of his brief referred to above. Mr Frame stated that he had gained the information in his brief about the conversation between Mr Pine and the Leovs from Mr Pine’s brief. [32] Under cross examina...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 119 French v ACC adjournment [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...the determination, the implication being that a de novo hearing was not sought. Inconsistent with that, however, the statement of claim did not specify the matters required by s 179(4) when a de novo hearing is not sought. [5] The impression I formed from reading the pleadings was that the plaintiff was not seeking a hearing de novo but, in the hearing today, Ms Buckett told me that she believed the hearing was to be de novo. This clearly illustrates the uncertainty of the plain...

7. McGregor v Jensen [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...24 July 2009 Background Due to defects in the construction of the house, damage ensued. The remedial work included a complete reclad however further work is still required to repair leaks associated with masonry block retaining walls. The claimants (Trust) alleged that the third respondent, Auckland City Council, the eighth respondent, Mr Boyd, the ninth respondent, Mr Halliday and the tenth respondent, Mr Hay are responsible for the defects and the resulting damage: Auckland C...

8. GP v SKS Ltd [2017] NZDT 1168 (10 February 2017) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...$38.87 being $1399.32. Mr GP has made no payments on this 36 month agreement. I will offset the $77.74 he is due against the $1399.32 he owes and that is $1321.58. [17] Therefore Mr GP is liable to SKS for $1321.58. [18] I note there was no request for the order of the return of the equipment but under the agreement SKS is entitled to decommission the alarm equipment at Mr GP’s home and Mr GP is required to allow the decommissioning and removal of the equipment....

9. Form-35_Family-Invoice_Relationship-Property.pdf [pdf, 225 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 35 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Relationship Property Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice P...

10. Form-38_ACC.pdf [pdf, 223 KB]

    Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 38 Tax Invoice ACC Legal Aid Fixed Fees Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Forum Category 1 2 N...