Search Results

1. FZ v KU [2022] NZDT 164 (26 September 2022) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...clinic and after discussion, was operated on by KU and others to remove the lump. After the surgery the wound broke down. FZ decided to euthanise Monty. They have brought a claim against KU because they believe that they were not given enough information prior to the surgery and wasted money having the lump removed. They also claim that they were misled about the cost of the surgery. They have claimed $4,000.00 which is less than the cost of the surgery as compensation. 2....

2. UC and NT Family Trust v TT Ltd [2020] NZDT 1497 (11 August 2020) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...therefore would have made a windfall. 6. KC says they had a settlement and referred to email exchanges between UC and TT Ltd. I have considered the email exchanges and find that there was a settlement. Settlement agreements do not need to be formal. In particular the email from TT Ltd to UC dated 30 April 2020 saying they accept the abatement amounts offered being; 0% for Outgoings at all Alert levels 60% for days in Alert level 4 $115.70 + GST per day 15% for days in Alert level...

3. U Ltd v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 652 (27 November 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...sum of $15,631.37. This includes interest [see paragraph 8) above] of $688.37. The counterclaim by D Ltd, and the claim by the U Trust, are both dismissed. Referee: GP Rossiter Date: 27 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. NZ Private Prosecution Service Ltd v Key (Strike-Out Application) [2015] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...affidavit sworn on 9 June 2015 Mr McCready deposed that on 29 April 2015, at a time when NZPPSL was endeavouring to persuade the District Court to accept the private prosecution brought by NZPPSL against the defendant, he had contacted Unite Union requesting Ms Bailey’s contact details but had been refused. He had subsequently served Ms Bailey with all documents filed in the Tribunal by emailing them to Unite Union. There had been no response with the result Mr McCready was unsure whe...

5. Morton v Marshall [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...the Claimants’ premises allowed water to penetrate the dwellinghouse thereby making it a “leaky building” as defined in the Act. The alterations were carried out less than 10 years ago and resulted in damage to the dwellinghouse. [2] Formal mediation was not attempted but rather the Claimants completed and filed a Notice of Adjudication dated 15 September 2005, naming as the sole Respondent Michael Marshall who is identified as the “builder”, and sought the sum of $15,...

6. UC v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 426 (17 June 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...that no administration fee is refundable since it appears none was paid by him. 16. Because the claims are all dismissed, there is no need to discuss issue 3. Referee: M Wilson Date: 17 June 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. Wise v Commissioner of Police [2020] NZHRRT 44 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] Ms Wise is a former employee of the New Zealand Police (Police). Ms Wise was made redundant from the Police on 6 February 2015. After concluding her employment with the Police Ms Wise made a number of information privacy requests leading up to an information privacy request dated 19 June 2018 which is the subject of this claim. [2] Ms Wise did not receive a response to her information privacy request until 29 August 2019, which was after she had filed her claim...

8. Te Manutukutuku Issue 20 [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...hui be called. The Tribunal urged that the first objective of the hui should be to decide on the criteria for appointment of the commissioners and only then should it move on to the selection of possible candidates. The Tribunal did not make a formal recommendation on the role of the Maori negotiators in the selection of commission members. However, it urged the minister to use the negotiators for advice on criteria for appoint­ ment, but, because the Maori negotiators were appointed...

9. LCRO 117/2018 VR v BJ (30 August 2019) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...disputed that the money was owing. His complaint about Ms BJ concerns the firm having served a statutory demand on Mr VR’s company, and then issuing liquidation proceedings to recover the money claimed. [4] On 16 February 2016, the claimant informed (via email) Mr VR’s company of the availability of “advert features” at the cost of “$800+ GST”, plus “$270 outstanding”. 2 The claimant requested payment “in advance” if Mr VR’s company “wish[ed] to procee...

10. RM ND and DD v EQC & VERO Insurance New Zealand Ltd (costs) [2023] CEIT-2019-0074 [pdf, 128 KB]

    ...argued that it was entitled to decline the claim or avoid the policy for breach of the “statements exclusion” in the policy. [15] The correctness of statements and fraud exclusion in the policy states: The proposal, application or declaration form is the basis of this contract. All statements made by you or on your behalf on any of these forms or otherwise in support of this policy must be complete and correct in all respects. If any claim under this policy is supported by a...