Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 157 Heritage Expeditions Ltd v Fraser [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...well have been suggested as an option or even seen as the best option, it is inherently unlikely that detailed management issues such as terms and conditions of employment would have been discussed at such a meeting. The company had yet to be formed, it was unknown when the company might be incorporated and there was no evidence that even the name had been decided at the time of the meeting on 5 September 2005. [56] Mr Russ’ evidence on this issue was entirely inconsistent with t...

2. David Bain interim report of Hon Robert Fisher QC on compensation claim [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...this report.! 8. A full copy of your letter of26 September 2012 and annexures is annexed to this interim report. This interim report is confined to an analysis of the reasoning revealed in the Binnie Report itself. It is based solely on views I have formed in reading that report together with legal and research materials not specific to the Bain case. I have not derived assistance from the wider materials l isted in your letter so far, although much ofthat material would doubtless be rel...

3. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 12th-14th reports (continued) [pdf, 125 KB]

   UNITED NATIONS CERD International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination Distr. GENERAL CERD/C/SR.1538 23 July 2004 ENGLISH Original: FRENCH COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION Sixty-first session SUMMARY RECORD OF THE 1538th MEETING Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on Wednesday, 14 August 2002, at 3 p.m. Chairman: Mr. DIACONU CONTENTS CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS, COMMENTS AND INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY...

4. Harland v ACC [2012] NZACA 2 [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...application with written submissions. [6] Mr Nee Harland filed the application by way of a simple letter, which I accept as amounting to an application by Ms Nee Harland to reinstate the appeal under ACA No. 02/05. [7] The Corporation filed a formal opposition and submissions from Mr McBride, with a bundle of relevant documents and a supporting affidavit from Mark Davis, who was employed by the Corporation as an Improvement Analyst between 2002 and 2008, to address the large...

5. [2008] NZEmpC WC 9/08 NZ Professional Firefighters Union & Ors v NZ Fire Service Commission & Ors [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...commence employment on Monday 26 May, that application was granted urgency by the Authority which conducted an investigation meeting on Friday 23 May and gave its determination the same day. The Authority declined the application. Upon being informed that all of the plaintiffs intended to challenge that determination, the Authority was subsequently persuaded to grant an interim injunction in very limited terms to preserve the position until these challenges could be made and decid...

6. S Ltd v MC [2025] NZDT 25 (9 April 2025) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...time while the repairs were carried out. However, S Ltd has only claimed for the actual repair costs it incurred. 20. Damages for breach of contract are intended to restore a party to the position they would have been in had the contract been performed. They are not intended to put the party in a better position than they may otherwise have been in. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 21. At the time the pump failed the excavator, including the pumps, had been operated for aroun...

7. Wellington v MacDonald - Te Maika B4 Residue (2008) 129 Whangarei MB 258 (129 WH 258) [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   ...and gifted it to Rose. She built a house on the land and in 1992 so ld the propelty to Mr and Mrs Chester. This is the propelty in Celtificate of Title 358175l. Rose 129 Whangarei MB 261 maintains that the section was sold at her father 's request and that he received a substantial propottion of the sale proceeds. [13] On 13 September 1988 the COlllt made orders pat1itioning Te Maika B into Te Maika B1, Te Maika B2, Te Maika B3 and Te Maika B4. Te Maika Bl was an area of 1,...

8. WT Te Manutukutuku Issue 70 [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Judge Isaac, the presiding officers, and members of the Tribunal to ensure the work of our unit meets their requirements. Finally, I would also like to acknowledge and thank my colleague Julie Tangaere who, over the past three years, has per­ formed the role of Acting Director for the Unit while also working as Director of the Māori Land Court. Thank you Julie for your leadership of the unit over this time. Kia ora rā. Grace Smit Director  This issue of Te Manu tukutuku...

9. Pilon v Iyengar and C&CDHB [2012] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...June 2011 both counsel and the then Chairperson cautioned Mr Pilon that were he to continue with the present claim he would expose himself to an application for costs. Mr Pilon having elected to press on regardless must accept the consequence. As requested by the second defendant the Tribunal makes an award of costs in the sum of $750. Formal orders [19] For the foregoing reasons the decision of the Tribunal in HRRT 012/2011 is that: [19.1] The claim by Mr Pilon is dismissed. [19....

10. TQ v UM & Ors [2023] NZDT 369 (2 August 2023) [pdf, 116 KB]

    ...done by N Ltd. He said he had been advised that as he did not have a contract with N Ltd, he could only bring a claim against UM. He asked the Tribunal to add N Ltd as a respondent, as well as CM and HT. 5. Those parties were added at TQ’s request. In addition, HT considered that he had a claim against N Ltd for work done on the jetski. He filed a separate claim, which was heard at the same time as this claim. 6. The issues I have to consider are: Page 2 of 5 a....